Intelligent Design vs Science? | Thread profile

Odd Fish Find Contradicts Intelligent-Design Argument Anne Minard for National Geographic News July 9, 2008 The discovery of a missing link in the evolution of bizarre flatfishes—each of which has both eyes on the same side of its head—could give intelligent design advocates a sinking feeling. CT scans of 50-million-year-old fossils have revealed an intermediate species between ...

Of all things, why another intelligent design VS evolution. . . . (I myself believe in evolution by the way).

QUOTE (brave_new_world @ Jul 13 2008, 04:21 PM) Of all things, why another intelligent design VS evolution. . . . (I myself believe in evolution by the way). You don't need to believe in evolution mate, only the unknown needs belief.

QUOTE (Mattshark @ Jul 14 2008, 12:23 AM) You don't need to believe in evolution mate, only the unknown needs belief. Like consciousness

QUOTE (brave_new_world @ Jul 13 2008, 04:24 PM) Like consciousness That depends on your definition of it (of which there is no agreement)

QUOTE (brave_new_world @ Jul 13 2008, 04:29 PM) Therefore it is unknown and requires belief. Well that depends on context, obviously you can see if some is producing brain waves and hence showing brain activity and you tell if someone had been knocked out.

QUOTE (seanph @ Jul 13 2008, 04:41 PM) Alright boys and girls ... enough now! This is about a damn ugly fish! And this is also about proof of intermediate species -- which the intelligent design community loves to ignore. Most kindly, Sean lol, that is because there is nothing intelligent about ID. I actually e-mailed Casey Luskin from IDEA and his whole explanation for ID ...

QUOTE (IamsSon @ Jul 13 2008, 04:30 PM) Is there any possibility that these are simply three different populations which simply happen to have some traits in common among all three and some traits that are common to two but not the third? Any possibility? Uh, yeah, they do share traits because they are all related. Thats part of evolution. New animals dont just 'poof' out of no ...

The thing is, I don't think anyone actually believes in ID. It is just frankly a coverup for Creationists.

QUOTE (IamsSon @ Jul 14 2008, 02:11 AM) Of course they are all related, they were created by the same God. How do we know which was a "newer" animal? Well by that "logic" just as related to a bacterium. We guess, we just decide "this one looks newer" and leave it at that. This post has been edited by Mattshark : Today, 09:57 AM