Science - How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activ... | Thread profile

Real look at the data shows that rise in CO2 follows the temperature increase. Turns the whole thing upside down. We are running out of easy oil and gas though and they want to use this baloney to get everyone to use alternatives. Scam. Al Gore sucks and it's freezing here in Minnesota. I was hoping it was true! Another corporate spin job. The Technician

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=87 Ad astra per alia porci

How do we know that recent CO 2 increases are due to human activities? Note: This is an update to an earlier post, which many found to be too technical. The original, and a series of comments on it, can be found here . See also a more recent post here for an even less technical discussion. Over the last 150 years, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations have risen from 280 to ...

Nope. CO2 increases follow temperature rise. Therefore they do not cause it and something else is causing global warming. Charts do show a correlation but look at them closely in time and you will see it's all wrong. Being used to justify massive global adjustmant due to peak oil which occurred in 2005-Simmons Int., Houston, Texas. We are running out of easy oil and gas which is why we ...

Sorry about that, I accidentally punted my connection. Here are some additional references concerning the isotpic concentration of the increasing portion of CO2 in our planet's atmosphere and how we can measure and compare this ratio in a manner that leads to a proper understanding of where it is coming from and where it is not coming from. http://www.radix.net/~bobg/faqs/scq.CO2rise.html.. .

KHod; Being used to justify massive global adjustmant due to peak oil which occurred in 2005-Simmons Int., Houston, Texas. This is utter nonsense. There is no evidence that 'peak oil', which is still a contested theory even though the oil companies have finally bought into Hubbert's theory, has been reached worldwide. We are running out of easy oil and gas which is why we invaded Iraq and ...

In article < 20080514221040.06558.00074628@mbucky-d03.news.aol. com.aol.com >, psiberdoom@aol.com (Psiberdoom) writes: > >None of this really has anything to do with the scientific evidence for >global warming and climate change, though. Of course not, which is what the scientific evidence presented clearly demostrates and illustrates. Ad astra per alia porci

<<< KHOD3 wrote: Real look at the data shows that rise in CO2 follows the temperature increase. Turns the whole thing upside down. We are running out of easy oil and gas though and they want to use this baloney to get everyone to use alternatives. Scam. Al Gore sucks and it's freezing here in Minnesota. I was hoping it was true! Another corporate spin job. The ...

In article < 20080514223724.32635.00068670@mbucky-m10.news.aol. com.aol.com >, rha8765611@aol.com (RHa8765611) writes: > OK, I am going to say this real slow. Look up Milankovic Cycles. Then look >up positive and negative feedbacks. The Milankovic Cycles starts a slow >warming which starts the release of CH4 and CO2. This provides additional >warming which then makes the warming more ...

KHOD posts: [[Real look at the data shows that rise in CO2 follows the temperature increase. ]] "A little learning is a dangerous thing./Drink deep, or do not drink, of the Pierian spring." CO2 rises following temperature in a natural deglaciation. This isn't a natural deglaciation. For the past 200 years CO2 has led temperature. Want to see the time series data?