Dwain Chambers | Thread profile

Who thinks that Dwain has been treated unfairly and who out there think he's got just what he deserves. I think it's unfair as we live in an extremely hypocritical land which hails the likes of George Best, Ozzy Osbourne, Amy Winehouse and Pete Doherty which are nothing but alcholic drug abusers in the worst sense of the saying, yet Dwain Chambers has not even been give his "second chance" as ...

so i take it they arnt letting him compete? if not its totally unfair i think britain is the only country where the athletes still get a life time olympic ban, he is the best we have, if we're not willing to send the best, we have no chance

Biggest crime was getting caught

Knew the rules before..... If he wants to come 7th or 8th and get even more ridicule then he should become a citizen/mercenary of a Rich Arab nation and compete for them as others have if the Olympics means so much to him. he is a good runner but I wouldnt want to put our name on the line for someone who is a long way off the best in the world it opens up a massive field for abuse

Out of order imo. He's served his ban, done the time for his crime. Why should he be punished for life? What right do they have to take away someones livelihood after he's served his punishment. Bang out of order imo.

imo a lot of them use "enhancing drugs" just they dont get caught. I have no evidence to back this up this is my own opinion.

The rules are there that you cant take drugs,he knew this yet chose to flout the rules and he knew that if caught he'd get a lifetime ban. It's what you call tough ****,he got caught. It reminds me of when kids get caught fighting and grass on everyone else(like Dwaine did but never named names).....the truth is,you get caught,you do the time. restraint on trade my ****....look at a lot of ...

agree with robsta he even tried american football but was no good so he tried rugby instead but still hasnt had a game. wonder what his next move will be. hes not best in the world but best this country has.

Quote: Originally Posted by Robsta Out of order imo. He's served his ban, done the time for his crime. Why should he be punished for life? What right do they have to take away someones livelihood after he's served his punishment. Bang out of order imo. I agree

Quote: Originally Posted by Robsta Out of order imo. He's served his ban, done the time for his crime. Why should he be punished for life? What right do they have to take away someones livelihood after he's served his punishment. Bang out of order imo. 1 Hew knew the rules which were in place before this case 2 It sets a precedent for future athletes to prime...