|
More site info...
Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri - www.petri.co.il | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://www.petri.co.il.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://www.petri.co.il.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://www.petri.co.il is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
407
|
1,517
|
4,338
|
|
Post:
|
798
|
3,324
|
9,936
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri (http://www.petri.co.il)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri posting activity graph:
|
|
http://www.petri.co.il Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri during last week:
user's latest post:
Adding users in Local Power...
Published (2009-11-26 13:54:00)
Code: net localgroup "Power Users" "Domain\Sec_Group" /Add Or Restricted Group GPO setting: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/279301 Cheers
user's latest post:
Session Broker with double...
Published (2009-11-25 15:56:00)
Anyone got some helpful thoughts? I've checked my configuration again, maybe I'm doing something wrong? All my dns entries point to the session broker, All TS-servers are in the correct local group. And they are members of the Farm.
user's latest post:
Correct Exchange configuration...
Published (2009-11-26 14:26:00)
Your posting is confusing me a little bit so let me rephrase what I have understood. - Each of your users has two mailboxes, one at a central organization and one in your little own world. - you setup a one way connection to send outgoing eMails through the central organization while the administrators of the central organization won't do anything to route incoming mails for you to your own little world - external mails and mails from the...
user's latest post:
Connecting to two different...
Published (2009-11-26 16:01:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Maish Correct, the VMKernel should only be used for vmotion/shared storage (which is not need in your case) Maish, thanks for the reply and your thorough explanations, yes you're right the 10/H connection is directly attached to the CISCO router port. So in this case can I say those VM (connected to vSwitch1) are secure as there is no other connection to my internal network. (ESXi console and VCB backup can...
user's latest post:
SBS 2008 Network Configuration
Published (2009-11-24 14:39:00)
In contrast to SBS 2003, SBS 2008 is not designed to be your router/switch/firewall. Flatten your network and re-design. Or can you give a valid reason why you want 6 subnets?
user's latest post:
domain and exchange 2003...
Published (2009-11-25 10:46:00)
thanks for the suggestion. as of now i have downloaded some tutorails and a book by a reputed author on exchange server 2003 and 70-284 exams. i hope this works around me. even though i am stuck with the huge porblem of exchange hanging every 7th day. i have posted the info as an seperate topic. if possible do have a look in that and advice
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri:
Windows 2000 Server, Windows Server 2003
- 17,075 posts
|
Exchange 2000, Exchange Server 2003
- 12,939 posts
|
Active Directory
- 8,607 posts
|
Exchange Server 2007
- 5,533 posts
|
Windows 2000 Pro, XP Pro
- 5,490 posts
|
SBS 2000/2003
- 4,496 posts
|
Misc
- 4,195 posts
|
Coffee Lounge and Introduction
- 4,122 posts
|
Cisco Routers & Switches How-to
- 4,098 posts
|
VMware Virtualization
- 3,925 posts
|
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri:
Started 5 days, 10 hours ago (2009-11-22 19:09:00)
by IlyaDA
you should use different vSwitch for each NIC
it's all
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-18 20:45:00)
by gddl630 Casual Casual
all slots in 4507R are full and would like to expand using 3750G stack (2 switches).
problem I have is only gi1/0/24 and gi4/5 connect - rest does not.
any idea why the EtherChannel does not establish with both links?
i used this a guideline http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk38...80094647.sh tml
on3750G side configuration
Code:
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/23
description ...
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-10-14 20:46:00)
by Hobie
Have you checked the spooler folder?
I've found my terminal servers Spooler folder need to be deleted regularly to prevent errors in printing.
c:\windows\system32\spool\printers
I have a simple script that runs each night to delete all *. tmp files in the folder when I know no one is logged in.
Hobie
Started 1 day, 15 hours ago (2009-11-26 14:04:00)
by FischFra
I don't think https://127.0.0.1/public will ever work in E2k7, but normally you should have in OWA at the left side a link to the Public Folders if you are using SP1 and all is correct set.
Check with
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l.../bb430795.a spx
Started 1 day, 14 hours ago (2009-11-26 14:26:00)
by FischFra
Your posting is confusing me a little bit so let me rephrase what I have understood.
- Each of your users has two mailboxes, one at a central organization and one in your little own world.
- you setup a one way connection to send outgoing eMails through the central organization while the administrators of the central organization won't do anything to route incoming mails for you to your own ...
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-20 22:45:00)
by teiger
You run the Mailbox Cleanup Agent - you should then see a Red X on all the
mailboxes. You can then reattach them to all the AD users that DON'T have a
mailbox attached to them. (You may have to delete empty mailboxes attached
to existing users then run the cleanup agent again)
Started 2 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-11-12 13:20:00)
by shauncroucher
The certificate should be a UC Or SAN certificate with subject alternative names to support autodiscover. Do you have this?
Can you open OWA without warnings?
Shaun
Started 1 day, 15 hours ago (2009-11-26 13:54:00)
by L4ndy
Code:
net localgroup "Power Users" "Domain\Sec_Group" /Add
Or Restricted Group GPO setting: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/279301
Cheers
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Petri.co.il forums by Daniel Petri:
Started 2 months, 3 weeks ago (2009-09-03 14:49:00)
by LeBusard
Hi dear community
Brand new here but not in IT, certified on MCSA 2003 Sec and VCP, i've just joined community to share & learn.
Hope get and send manhy answers
Read U soon
Le Busard
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 18:43:00)
by cruachan
You can't have a second DC in an SBS environment. It's a one server solution only.
I don't know if you can have a second Exchange server, I've never tried it, although I wouldn't recommend it anyway in this setup even if it is allowed. Exchange needs access to a DC/GC so if the WAN link was down you'd have no Exchange anyway.
You can have a member server in SBS though, so that might ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 18:50:00)
by cruachan
If you are installing AD don't use the .local suffix for the domain. Macs use this suffix internally and it causes all manner of weird DNS issues.
I would install DNS, DHCP etc on the server though - it's a lot easier to maintain and much more scalable.
Started 4 days, 18 hours ago (2009-11-23 11:04:00)
by bio
I have done the course as well. However I have not done the exam yet. But beware of this exam because i heared that this one is very though. Better know what you are talking about before taking it. Know that configuration maximums document inside out
bio..
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 16:10:00)
by Sembee
That is not an Exchange message that you have posted.
The server the email is being delivered to is rejecting the email.
Are you using a smart host? If so, check that there is no smart host and authentication details configured on the SMTP virtual server of the old machine. If there are, remove them and put them on to an SMTP Connector.
Inbound email will be something else ...
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-17 18:04:00)
by joeqwerty
If I'm not mistaken, the problem is that you are using two load balancing mechanisms that operate at different layers and they're competing with each other. When you initially make the connection, NLB "picks up" the incoming connection and sends it to one server based on network availability (layer 3) and you get a login box, then Session Broker "picks up" the incoming connection and sends it to ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 21:43:00)
by Daze
Does http or https access work?
Started 6 days, 11 hours ago (2009-11-21 18:03:00)
by Sembee
To stop the user from sending email to the Internet you need to configure a connector:
http://www. amset.info/exchange/restr...ternetmail. asp
Inbound email is more difficult.
The only option I can think of is just set user.name@example.com (ie whatever email address matches your usual standard) to direct somewhere else. However if someone internally enters the SMTP address then ...
Started 3 days, 15 hours ago (2009-11-24 13:49:00)
by L4ndy
Hi,
This should not be on this Suggestions and Feedback forum.
Also just to clarify, DNS records are used as part of the name resolution process and "Ports" are used by applications/processes to communicate with each other.
I can't see a direct correlation between the two unless it is properly explained what you are trying to achieve.
Started 4 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-10-29 09:42:00)
by sorinso
I don't get it...
Disk2VHD is a P2V ( Physical-to-Virtual tool). You took an existing Windows7 installation and virtualized it?
If so, what was the size of the original disk? What disk controller was it sitting on?
What is the size of the VHD file?
|
|
Size: 61 bytes
