|
More site info...
Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums - obgyn.net | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://obgyn.net.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://obgyn.net.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://obgyn.net is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
Title:
|
 Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums
|
|
Url:
|
http://obgyn.net
|
|
Users activity:
|
1 post per thread |
|
site activity:
|
203 active threads during last week |
|
Site rank:
|
6,013 (go to rank page)
|
|
Domain info for:
|
obgyn.net
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
203
|
739
|
1,947
|
|
Post:
|
208
|
762
|
1,977
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums (http://obgyn.net)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums posting activity graph:
|
|
http://obgyn.net Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums during last week:
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-24 07:50:00)
If it weren't for Fox News, I'd not have known about the Great Seal Hunt, el. Art At Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: > >And they get their evidence from the newspaper and FixNews. > >But then that suits you if it suits you. > >el > >on 11/24/09 3:31 PM R. Daniel Braun said the following: >> And how many of them have you seen who were satisfied with doing...
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-25 05:09:00)
In a message dated 11/24/09 11:09:30 PM, el@lisse.na writes: > They are usually > quite measured if not moderate at what they say, but it *DID* impress me > seriously when they used the word *lies* to characterize the > Republicans' way of dealing with it in the public. > So then you admit that you believe news media talking heads more than folks with "boots on the ground," as they say....
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-24 17:06:00)
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 00759DA688257678_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" No, I think Richard is en pointe. I think He's trying to tell Us, using Joe's 'complete life system' criteria, He's now "pasture"-ized. /tj NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or...
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-24 14:05:00)
Are you saying it is a moo point?? Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:29:45 -0600 From: rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com To: ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net Subject: Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS IN THE US moooooo Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [ mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net ] On Behalf Of DoctorJoe@aol.com Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 8:42 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re:...
user's latest post:
Re: Good PR move!!!
Published (2009-11-23 17:43:00)
You've got that one nailed right on the head. J At Mon, 23 Nov 2009, GORDON M. GOLDMAN wrote: > >But nonetheless, a PR move. If UHC can see significant $$$ at the end of the tunnel, they will simply say 'well, we tried' and eventually go along with the more profitable option. Their history has shown that in a decision between $$$ and healthcare, they always side with $$$. > >Gordon...
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-24 15:10:00)
That is utterly ridiculous. Oh, oh, we have been down the path before -- Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [ mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net ] On Behalf Of Andrew Folley Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 1:15 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS IN THE US Are you saying it is a moo point?? _____ Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:29:45 -0600 From: rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com To:...
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-25 05:47:00)
No, I do admit that I take ARD, ZDF and/or BBC *ANY* time before any US broadcaster, FixNews in particular, not only because you don't have a clue about anyting outside the home kitchen, obviously. el DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 11/24/09 11:09:30 PM, el@lisse.na writes: > >> They are usually >> quite measured if not moderate at what they say, but it *DID* impress me...
user's latest post:
a must listen
Published (2009-11-23 18:35:00)
This is a copy of a paragraph taken from an email update I get from Don Palmisano (Past AMA President). He does not always agree with AMA positions and is an independent thinker. The speech by Dr. Constantian is long, but well worth listening to and disseminating. Gordon DJP Update 11-23-2009 Outstanding speech on health system reform by Dr. Mark Constantian; AA0-HNS opposes Senate bill ITEM ONE: Outstanding speech on health system reform by...
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-22 20:12:00)
I agree, Robert. Anna Meenan, MD >Recent exchange with a patient: > >Me: How can I help you today? >Pt: I want a pap smear >Me: You just had one 3 months ago; it was (ASCUS, HPV -); you don't >need another one. I know I said repeat it in 6 months, but even >that is overdoing it; 3 months is really unnecessary. >Pt: When I was here the last time, you wouldn't give me what I...
user's latest post:
Re: US POL: NO MORE ANNUAL EXAMS...
Published (2009-11-25 06:35:00)
--001485f7791e9eb6950479321379 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nah Rick isn't , but I am and I am very glad of it. Dan On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM, < Terrence.Jones@kp.org > wrote: > > No, I think Richard is en pointe. I think He's trying to tell Us, using > Joe's 'complete life system' criteria, He's now...
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums:
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums:
No activity within last 3 months.
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Obstetricians, Gynecologist and Patient Forums:
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-23 15:16:00)
by art fougner, md
Two sides ... same coin.
At Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Terrence.Jones@kp.org wrote:
>
>This is a multipart message in MIME format.
>--=_alternative 006F025B88257677_
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>Don't confuse Angels with Demons. /tj
>
>NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
>e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or ...
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-23 15:08:00)
by Gordon Goldman
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:56 PM
Subject: UnitedHealthcare will continue to offer coverage of screenings for women under 50
Dear Valued Medical Society Leaders:
In the wake of the news coverage of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for mammography screening, we have received questions about our mammography policy. UnitedHealthcare greatly respect the excellent work of ...
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-23 13:16:00)
by Joe
I concur with Art. Joe C
> If the patient isn't bleeding or the endometrial cavity isn't filled
> with blood on the sonar, why do anything? Just asking.
>
> Art
>
> At Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Dr. Ainsworth wrote:
>
>> Hysteroscopy under anesthesia. You need endometrial sampling prior to
>> considering a hysterectomy
>>
>> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [ mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn....
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-23 13:13:00)
by Terrence.Jones@kp.org
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 006F025B88257677_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Don't confuse Angels with Demons. /tj
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender ...
|
|
Size: 6,617 bytes
