|
More site info...
Myspace.com - Photography - groups.myspace.com/photo | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://groups.myspace.com/photo.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://groups.myspace.com/photo.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://groups.myspace.com/photo is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Myspace.com - Photography:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
30
|
98
|
408
|
|
Post:
|
58
|
209
|
1,173
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Myspace.com - Photography (http://groups.myspace.com/photo)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Myspace.com - Photography posting activity graph:
|
|
http://groups.myspace.com/photo Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Myspace.com - Photography during last week:
user's latest post:
What do you think of these?:)
Published (2009-12-25 20:24:00)
I have no problem with the camera you used and generally speaking the shots have decent exposures. It looks like the second two had an effect applied either in the camera or in Photoshop. Personally, I’m always fond of the cross-processed film look like shot two has. The third one just looks awful though, really pixelated or something (and I don’t think that is the camera’s fault), the editing looks funky....
user's latest post:
Car picks for hotrod junkies
Published (2009-12-23 03:33:00)
Wayne wrote: Love the perspective on this one, nice shot Wayne!
user's latest post:
Please tell me what you think?
Published (2009-12-22 07:26:00)
1 should have been a vertical not horizontal too much ’negative space’ bright at that which takes away from the viewer’s subject - cute pose. 2 terrible pose period the child being blind folded is not cute 3it might be the best an honest pose with little clutter but your exposure might be off and seems you have a lot of digital noise/artifacts in the capture what iso are you shooting at? use a MUCH lower one. 4...
user's latest post:
What do you think of these?:)
Published (2009-12-25 06:44:00)
I think I-Phones are great if you like all the bells and whistles and want to pay that much for a cel service. I also think that they aren’t much in the way of photographic equipment. 1 appears to be fairly nicely composed although I’d crop it so that little tiny piece of sky isn’t in it. I am also a firm believer that, with a few notable exceptions, a slow shutter is required to shoot moving water. Obviously this...
Elle/Puppy dogs and rainbows
4
user's latest post:
Another shot from FILM....old...
Published (2009-12-18 18:10:00)
Do you mean in general, or for 120? I’m sure you already know of Kodak BW400CN and Ilford XP2. Unless you’re looking for finer grain, then I agree. I had the same issue, when I was in Colorado. All the color film they had was Portra and Ektar. Never any B&W Though, in San Francisco, they have some Ilford PanF 50 speed that I really want to try.
user's latest post:
Please tell me what you think?
Published (2009-12-21 02:14:00)
1. is a little hot. Bring the exposure down just a little and it’s great. 2 and 3 seem to be just a tad soft. 4 is adorable. for a beginner you’re doing really well. the composition is a little centered but overall they’re nice pics. Just shoot a lot and you’ll only get better......and have fun!
user's latest post:
Schools
Published (2009-12-17 03:40:00)
Mendell wrote: No community college I’ve ever heard of has any real studio equipment. Thats because you live in Texas.
user's latest post:
let me know what you think?...
Published (2009-12-21 08:08:00)
Sђαwηtαє wrote: I did think sel-est (?) could have been a little more gentle on the girl. The first message seemed very condescending. Selective color isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but it’s her photo. I like selective color..my only hangup about the photo is the catch light as others mentioned. Keep your head up girl. Just have fun with it because it’s obviously something you’re interested in. There’s always going to be...
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Myspace.com - Photography during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Myspace.com - Photography:
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Myspace.com - Photography:
Started 4 days, 5 hours ago (2009-12-23 03:33:00)
by Pixel Perfect Images
Wayne wrote:
Love the perspective on this one, nice shot Wayne!
Started 2 days, 2 hours ago (2009-12-25 06:44:00)
by Mike
I think I-Phones are great if you like all the bells and whistles and want to pay that much for a cel service. I also think that they aren’t much in the way of photographic equipment.
1 appears to be fairly nicely composed although I’d crop it so that little tiny piece of sky isn’t in it. I am also a firm believer that, with a few notable exceptions, a slow shutter is required to shoot ...
Started 2 days, 8 hours ago (2009-12-25 00:01:00)
by Pentax Junkie
Jay wrote:
Who is this incredible gentle beast? Possibly the greatest author America has seen in 50 years--and a philanthropist. All $ from this book goes to charity, but that’s…holy shit! Just do something for yourself (and the world) and read it! How did he put Jesus, Buddha, hookers, blues musicians, stoners, lesbians, junkies, saints, Tibetan Lamas, Native American wise people, ...
Started 6 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-21 02:14:00)
by Mendell
1. is a little hot. Bring the exposure down just a little and it’s great.
2 and 3 seem to be just a tad soft. 4 is adorable.
for a beginner you’re doing really well. the composition is a little centered but overall they’re nice pics.
Just shoot a lot and you’ll only get better......and have fun!
Started 3 weeks, 5 days ago (2009-11-30 22:21:00)
by Classy
i like the selective coloring. the only thing is that the white reflection in the eye is distracting. but it’s still a good shot.
Started 6 days, 3 hours ago (2009-12-21 05:32:00)
by Mike
Sweet shots, all. That last one is badass!
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-18 14:23:00)
by Pentax Junkie
Monique Melancholy wrote:
Generally well composed, but why do they have no feet? I like the color, could probably do without those borders.
Started 6 days, 10 hours ago (2009-12-20 21:54:00)
by PerronePhotography.com
Dog = Blurry
Cat = Cool
Landscape = great
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-18 00:47:00)
by Mendell
This is sweet!
What ever happened to the Ektar films? It seems that as soon as Kodak came out with a great film, they discontinued it! The Ektar 25 was the best negative film ever made, in my opinion. It had some quirks but nothing that a little experimenting would solve.
Course it’s all mute point now......
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Myspace.com - Photography:
Started 6 days, 3 hours ago (2009-12-21 05:32:00)
by Mike
Sweet shots, all. That last one is badass!
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-18 00:47:00)
by Mendell
This is sweet!
What ever happened to the Ektar films? It seems that as soon as Kodak came out with a great film, they discontinued it! The Ektar 25 was the best negative film ever made, in my opinion. It had some quirks but nothing that a little experimenting would solve.
Course it’s all mute point now......
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-18 14:23:00)
by Pentax Junkie
Monique Melancholy wrote:
Generally well composed, but why do they have no feet? I like the color, could probably do without those borders.
Started 6 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-21 02:14:00)
by Mendell
1. is a little hot. Bring the exposure down just a little and it’s great.
2 and 3 seem to be just a tad soft. 4 is adorable.
for a beginner you’re doing really well. the composition is a little centered but overall they’re nice pics.
Just shoot a lot and you’ll only get better......and have fun!
Started 2 days, 2 hours ago (2009-12-25 06:44:00)
by Mike
I think I-Phones are great if you like all the bells and whistles and want to pay that much for a cel service. I also think that they aren’t much in the way of photographic equipment.
1 appears to be fairly nicely composed although I’d crop it so that little tiny piece of sky isn’t in it. I am also a firm believer that, with a few notable exceptions, a slow shutter is required to shoot ...
Started 3 weeks, 5 days ago (2009-11-30 22:21:00)
by Classy
i like the selective coloring. the only thing is that the white reflection in the eye is distracting. but it’s still a good shot.
Started 6 days, 10 hours ago (2009-12-20 21:54:00)
by PerronePhotography.com
Dog = Blurry
Cat = Cool
Landscape = great
Started 2 days, 8 hours ago (2009-12-25 00:01:00)
by Pentax Junkie
Jay wrote:
Who is this incredible gentle beast? Possibly the greatest author America has seen in 50 years--and a philanthropist. All $ from this book goes to charity, but that’s…holy shit! Just do something for yourself (and the world) and read it! How did he put Jesus, Buddha, hookers, blues musicians, stoners, lesbians, junkies, saints, Tibetan Lamas, Native American wise people, ...
Started 4 days, 5 hours ago (2009-12-23 03:33:00)
by Pixel Perfect Images
Wayne wrote:
Love the perspective on this one, nice shot Wayne!
Started 1 week, 4 days ago (2009-12-15 21:37:00)
by Elle/Puppy dogs and rainbows
Look into a Community College.
That’s where I went (stupid idea, for me), to Colorado’s community college.
|
|
Myspace.com - Photography
Size: 330 bytes
