|
More site info...
Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com - www.expertlaw.com | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://www.expertlaw.com.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://www.expertlaw.com.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://www.expertlaw.com is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
1,443
|
5,138
|
14,871
|
|
Post:
|
2,537
|
9,915
|
27,892
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com (http://www.expertlaw.com)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com posting activity graph:
|
|
http://www.expertlaw.com Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com during last week:
user's latest post:
Illegal Dumping
Published (2009-11-07 22:19:00)
Is mom going to come to court and confess that she was responsible?
user's latest post:
Guardianship Laws in Illinois
Published (2009-11-07 10:06:00)
Formal guardianship is typically handled through the courts, rather than with a simple signed, notarized paper. You'd do well to consult with an attorney specializing in family law to ensure that everything is on the level. First consultation is usually free.
user's latest post:
Can I Be Forced to Allow Use of...
Published (2009-11-07 21:35:00)
does your bridge connect to the city property such as a street or such? It doesn't sound like it but I am trying to figure out why anybody would think she would have any legal right to use your bridge. From what I can understand here, I would simply tell her to build her own city acceptable bridge and to stay off your property.
user's latest post:
Exposing Predators on My Blog -...
Published (2009-11-07 17:12:00)
Quoting brandirosejc "I get the sinking feeling that you're a professional victim. I digress." By that I meant your passive aggressive approach, which I see you gleefully continue here. For instance, you take an objective, factually accurate, non-threatening, non-inflammatory remark about the potential legal fallout of such a thing as "abusive". That says to me, "Hi there. I'd like to...
user's latest post:
The 'Inevitable...
Published (2009-11-07 02:10:00)
So, to recap: Got this far, and gave up. I will continue praying for you. I won't read anymore of your pointless garbage though. __________________ your island of serenity, amid this sea of insanity I can lead a donkey to the well of knowledge, but I can't make the JackAsh drink it. Roger
Mr. Knowitall Mr. Knowitall is...
56
user's latest post:
Foreclosure
Published (2009-11-07 09:47:00)
As long as they still owned the house, they can rent it out. They may be liable for damages if they breach the lease, such that you have to move early due to foreclosure. You say there was a notice of foreclosure in November, 2008. That was a year ago. What happened between then and now?
user's latest post:
VC 23109(C) Ticket
Published (2009-11-07 14:19:00)
Quoting rxrunner wow thanks That Guy, well next to my code it does say "M" M, stands for M isdemeanor...
Mr. Knowitall Senior Member
51
user's latest post:
Listed as 'Do Not...
Published (2009-11-07 19:09:00)
That is simply incorrect. You have no constitutional right to respond to the content of a private employer's records of your employment.
user's latest post:
California Battery Expungement
Published (2009-11-06 13:28:00)
It says 242/243? What was the original date of the offense or conviction? (month and year would be sufficient) - Carl
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com:
shoplifting
- 21,225 posts
|
speeding tickets
- 10,711 posts
|
child custody
- 10,088 posts
|
emancipation
- 8,982 posts
|
child support
- 8,729 posts
|
Shoplifting And Retail Fraud
- 7,981 posts
|
Banter
- 7,965 posts
|
paternity and DNA tests
- 5,591 posts
|
assault
- 5,438 posts
|
Debate the Issues
- 4,896 posts
|
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com:
Started 1 day, 8 hours ago (2009-11-08 16:25:00)
by cbg
Smoking is not a protected right under either Federal or Iowa law.
Under the law, breaks of under 20 minutes must be a paid break. However, neither state nor Federal law prohibits the employer from requiring that pay to come out of your PTO time.
Additionally, neither Federal nor Iowa law requires that you be granted smoke breaks at all (NO state in the US requires smoke breaks). In ...
Started 1 day, 15 hours ago (2009-11-08 10:08:00)
by LawResearcherMissy
As a 17 year old, emancipation is not an option for you.
Quote:
Section 26-13-1
When authorized; procedure generally.
The several juvenile courts of the state are authorized to relieve minors over 18 years of age from the disabilities of nonage in the following cases and none other:
(1) Whenever the father or the mother ...
Started 1 day, 15 hours ago (2009-11-08 10:08:00)
by LawResearcherMissy LawResearcherMissy is online now Senior Member
As a 17 year old, emancipation is not an option for you.
Quote:
Section 26-13-1
When authorized; procedure generally.
The several juvenile courts of the state are authorized to relieve minors over 18 years of age from the disabilities of nonage in the following cases and none other:
(1) Whenever the father or the mother ...
Started 1 day, 8 hours ago (2009-11-08 16:38:00)
by cdwjava
You need to speak with an attorney who can work on presenting a defense based upon you mental capacity and lack of ability to form the intent to commit a crime.
However, the fact that you chose not to take your medication will likely play against you since such delusions are probably a predictable result of your failure to take the medication.
Consult local counsel ASAP.
Started 2 days, 9 hours ago (2009-11-07 15:27:00)
by Lecasbas
That's one of the problems with credit cards. Once you establish a relationship with one of them, then all pertinent information can be shared with all involved with the debt, no matter where it goes.
You will need to send a cease communications to each collector as they contact you. Or, you could save a few bucks and simply ignore them.
I usually look them up on my courts online to...
Started 1 day, 11 hours ago (2009-11-08 14:03:00)
by cdwjava
She has to follow the rules of her probation. Legally, if the relationship is not sexual in any way, you can "see" each other. But, if her P.O. says it ain't allowed, then it ain't allowed.
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Legal Information - ExpertLaw.com:
Started 2 months ago (2009-09-08 18:12:00)
by Mr. Knowitall
Why are you sure you passed the sobriety tests? What does the police report say about your performance on those tests? Because that's where things presently hang.
Did you elicit any testimony in relation to inevitable discovery or the sobriety tests during your hearing?
Started 2 months ago (2009-09-08 18:12:00)
by Mr. Knowitall Mr. Knowitall is offline Senior Member
Why are you sure you passed the sobriety tests? What does the police report say about your performance on those tests? Because that's where things presently hang.
Did you elicit any testimony in relation to inevitable discovery or the sobriety tests during your hearing?
Started 1 week, 6 days ago (2009-10-27 20:13:00)
by 525601minutes
You should pay for the damages you caused to both the truck you hit and the car you borrowed.
Started 1 month ago (2009-10-10 22:20:00)
by blueeagle
Sad.
Not that it matters, but was the kid actually committing a burglary.
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-10-30 13:19:00)
by Mr. Knowitall
It's best to leave the kids out of the middle. If you have problems with your ex's conduct, you should discuss them with your ex or, if not possible, your lawyer.
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-02 17:02:00)
by cissycicle
Seems like the logical thing to do would be to report all income you received. Would your argument for appeal be that you entered into a contract to defraud several government agencies and the other party violated the terms?
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-09-24 21:37:00)
by EWYLTJ
You were probably cited with 22350... right??
If so, you want to keep his lidar data. Take a look at VC 40802 for the real definition of speed trap.
You should obtain the speed survey for the highway you were cited on. Call CALTRANS if it was a state road.
Started 4 days, 8 hours ago (2009-11-05 16:35:00)
by 525601minutes
Quoting Jean
The reason is that I was terminated from the spa casino after a year and a halt after reaching ten points and a half in one year and a half. .... I was late four times in a year and a half thatÂ’s mean four points .
I am trying to understand your post. Are you stating that your former employer...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-01 19:26:00)
by cdwjava
If convicted, the Vehicle code mandates a license suspension for one year. However, you CAN request a restricted license through the court.
Your best bet to argue an unlawful search would be to hire an attorney. Whether he had reasonable suspicion to detain you or not will depend on what he has to say. Note that it takes very little suspicion to justify a detention. And, it is likely he ...
Started 5 days, 16 hours ago (2009-11-04 08:45:00)
by The_Man210 The_Man210 is offline Junior Member
My question involves police conduct in the State of: Georgia
My neighbors called the police on a noise complaint. I was inside, no music on at this time, studying in the living room (from which I can see the kitchen and the back door). I hear a tap on the back door, look to see flashlights and then a police officer immediately enters our kitchen. There was a bong sitting on the kitchen ...
|
|
Size: 847 bytes
