|
More site info...
IMDb - Star Trek (2009) - imdb.com/title/tt0796366/ | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://imdb.com/title/tt0796366/.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://imdb.com/title/tt0796366/.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://imdb.com/title/tt0796366/ is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on IMDb - Star Trek (2009):
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
519
|
1,325
|
2,868
|
|
Post:
|
2,666
|
6,041
|
10,991
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for IMDb - Star Trek (2009) (http://imdb.com/title/tt0796366/)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
IMDb - Star Trek (2009) posting activity graph:
|
|
http://imdb.com/title/tt0796366/ Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on IMDb - Star Trek (2009) during last week:
user's latest post:
No defences?
Published (2009-11-27 23:35:00)
Again, I claim no responsibility for your assumptions because my point was you and ent0r are making blanket statements about what the writers said in the past based on limited information available to them. Whereas in the DVD commentary the director clearly references the comicbook. Besides, unlike you I'm not worked up based on whether or not the comic book is canon. My point has been and still remains the comic is part of the same...
user's latest post:
Ehm.... are black holes in Star...
Published (2009-11-27 18:13:00)
ent0r; after several weeks and hundreds of posts, we are again at a point where I detect an inconsistency in your arguments about plot logic concerning Star Trek 2009 and other popular science-fiction such as the original Star Wars trilogy and previous Star Trek canon. I also detect some inconsistencies in your and master exploders as well. Enfantterribles posts are mostly made up crap, but it is consistent in it's nonsense. * To the...
user's latest post:
So they just basically wiped out...
Published (2009-11-27 17:06:00)
More like Fast and Furious in space. As interpreted by Dawson's Creek. ______________________________ 3d Modeling www.nfxstudios3d.com
user's latest post:
Another post that will piss off...
Published (2009-11-23 00:45:00)
"did anyone else hate the guy playing Kirk? He sounded like a surfer." You mean the actor Chris Pine? Well, he is from California. :)! What does a surfer sound like? I think you may be confusing the Kirk character with the Bo Barrett character who Chris Pine played in "Bottle Shock". Bo Barrett did some surfing and lived in the Napa Valley, north of San Fransisco. When he wasn't surfing, he was tasting...
user's latest post:
Ehm.... are black holes in Star...
Published (2009-11-27 18:55:00)
To ent0r; "I never said that the original Star Wars is completely consistent. I am aware of many plotholes and inconsitencies in the movies. That doesn't stop me from enjoying them." As I figured, enjoying a movie like Star Wars is based on personal feelings. That is all we're talking about, gut reactions to popular science-fiction movies like Star Trek 2009. You didn't like Star Trek 2009 and I liked it. We...
user's latest post:
Kirk had an older brother?
Published (2009-11-26 21:19:00)
Correct. The character of Sam Kirk was written into the original screenplay. The character was portrayed by Spenser Daniels and the scenes were filmed. In post-production, Sam's scenes were edited out and his character's name was changed from Sam to Johnny - who is the hitchhiker Jim passes in the corvette. (The deleted scenes on the bonus dvd shows Spenser Daniels' scenes - available for viewing on youtube)
user's latest post:
Incredible Coincidences
Published (2009-11-26 16:00:00)
It's fate. But really again it isn't what gives that episode it's power.
user's latest post:
Brown captain was a badass
Published (2009-11-25 21:13:00)
More? Here you go : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0274518/ ___ Thinking is good food. You should eat some every day.
user's latest post:
Great Addition to the Trek...
Published (2009-11-25 09:03:00)
Robert, first of all congratulations on winning your fight. You must be a tough person. Best of luck to you in the future as well. I hear what you are saying in terms of that scenario. If I was facing death, I would certainly dig in for a fight and think positively. But in everything else? I cannot. I do so when appropriate, but cannot kid myself that everything in life has a positive.
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on IMDb - Star Trek (2009) during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on IMDb - Star Trek (2009):
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on IMDb - Star Trek (2009):
Started 17 hours, 31 minutes ago (2009-11-29 05:06:00)
by enfanterrible
I'm hoping, it'll be you. Are you wearing your redshirt today?
Started 2 days, 10 hours ago (2009-11-27 12:12:00)
by enfanterrible
Started 4 days, 6 hours ago (2009-11-25 16:25:00)
by enfanterrible
Huh? Which DVD or Blu-ray did u buy? Which region? Mine is region 2 DVD and it doesn't have any previews from other movies.
Started 22 hours, 12 minutes ago (2009-11-29 00:25:00)
by TrekFan1
Actually, my drunk friend, the sign you speak of (the Vulcan salute) was devised by Leonard Nimoy and is based on a gesture made by certain Jewish denominations. I don't doubt that the sign is an insult somewhere in the world, but it certainly wasn't "stolen" in that regard.
Space is disease and danger wrapped in darkness and silence!
Started 22 hours, 7 minutes ago (2009-11-29 00:30:00)
by mcl-denis
Please learn to type. And please learn to read. This has already been discussed in previous posts, but the simple refutation of yours would be that the Enterprise was actually traveling at warp speed -- thus faster than the speed of light. Neither Einstein nor any other physicists (that I am aware of) postulate what would happen to entities traveling faster than the speed of light.
Started 1 day, 23 hours ago (2009-11-27 23:28:00)
by TrekFan1
Here's the complete chart for DVD sales and rentals for the week ending November 22nd. It does not include the money each movie made; that info should be available next week via sites like the-numbers.com.
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rentrak-an nounces-top-dvd-sale s-and-rentals-for-week-ending-november-22-2009-746 11547.html
Space is disease and danger wrapped in darkness and...
Started 21 hours, 48 minutes ago (2009-11-29 00:49:00)
by sexual-tyrannosaurus
I noticed that throughout the movie, the Nerada seemed to have unlimited firepower, yet at the end, when Nero shouts out "Fire everything!" they only fired about a dozen missiles.
Started 2 months ago (2009-09-26 21:49:00)
by encorek
The Next Generation's movies, (even the excellent First Contact)...all never felt like movies, they only felt like the TV shows, but longer and with a bigger budget...
Johnathan Frakes is no JJ Abrams.
Started 2 days, 6 hours ago (2009-11-27 16:06:00)
by enfanterrible
Nothing was wiped out. My TOS and TNG DVDs still have everything and tht canon still exists in the prime universe where Spock came from. The new movie is a separate canon happening in its own universe. Trek canon shows the existense of parallel universes and mirror universes.
|
|
Hot threads for last week on IMDb - Star Trek (2009):
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-22 14:33:00)
by vashsunglasses
Who says they don't have gay crew members? Just because you didn't see a couple of dudes screwing against a bulkhead doesn't mean that there aren't homosexual crew members...
Also, you should get that caps lock key checked, I think it's broken.
Witty closing remarks have been replaced by massive head trauma and severe hemorrhaging.
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-20 15:27:00)
by shellieeyre
#1: it would not be his Romulus he was saving but the world from the parallel universe; his wife would still be dead. And in any case, the time travel was, as pointed out, a freakish occurrance. There is no way of knowing how or whether Nero could control the process.
#2: Spock was not "making out" with Uhura. That was a scene of comfort and gref. I don't really see how you characterise ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-21 07:19:00)
by nfxstudios
The only real response to this, although probably pretty weak, is that peaceful core Federation planets such as Earth and Vulcan probably don't have any sort of planetary military. I'm guessing there may be a weapon platform of some sort in orbit (as I believe there was in the 4th season of Enterprise), but that the "primary" defense of these planets probably falls to the fleet of starships they...
Started 4 days, 23 hours ago (2009-11-24 22:51:00)
by Flyer_1983
The only thing I didn't like is the incredible coincidence that Kirk, ejected by the young Spock, landed within walking distance of the old Spock.
They were on the same planet, true, but they were definitely more than ten miles apart. After Kirk got out of the shuttle, he was chased by that polar bear/gorilla thing and then he was chased by that other big red thing, fell down a mountain ...
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-19 02:34:00)
by enfanterrible
Dozens of other threads that justfify this. If you are interested you are welcome to read them. If you're here just to whine, suit yourself.
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-21 13:38:00)
by nfxstudios
So, how is a supernova supposed to destroy the galaxy, again?
The same way a torpedo is supposed to turn a nebula into a fully formed planet with vegetation and animals, and a sun to keep it warm, I suppose.
______________________________
3d Modeling
www.nfxstudios3d.com
Started 6 days, 10 hours ago (2009-11-23 11:39:00)
by shellieeyre
Sulu isn't a Japanese name either. The name was taken from the Sulu Sea in which is found the Sulu archipeligo, and the character represented that region, just as Uhura represented Africa.
It's Eyre. As in Jane.
Started 1 week, 4 days ago (2009-11-18 15:16:00)
by Rob_the_Zombie
Tell me about it. I think they tried to make her a "strong role model" for other black women, or something.
Why so serial?
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-21 14:42:00)
by bajbhdkn-1
Uhura probably fell for Spock for the same reason that women have been falling for Spock since 1966.
Divas Rule!
Started 3 days, 3 hours ago (2009-11-26 19:18:00)
by nfxstudios
Well, very little is known about black holes at present, as it is. We know light can't escape. What about something faster than light? You can't really speculate scientifically, because science doesn't especially believe anything is faster than light (except maybe superluminal tachyons, but whatever :P).
So who knows whether a starship capable of faster than light travel would be able to ...
|
|
IMDb - Star Trek (2009)
Size: 62 bytes
