|
More site info...
IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007) - www.imdb.com/title/tt0465234/ | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465234/.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465234/.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465234/ is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007):
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
13
|
30
|
86
|
|
Post:
|
16
|
37
|
105
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007) (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465234/)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007) posting activity graph:
|
|
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465234/ Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007) during last week:
user's latest post:
Who is this a picture of?
Published (2010-01-04 09:23:00)
OK. Well, she would have made for one hot looking first lady. Hot enough to be the first and second lady if you ask me. "Please sign on the dotted line."
user's latest post:
Still Rolling My Eyes
Published (2009-12-27 21:50:00)
This message has been deleted by an administrator
the_darkness_of_poetic_humor
2
user's latest post:
Still Rolling My Eyes
Published (2010-01-01 19:57:00)
DjfunkmasterG this is something I totally agree with you with, especially in the bottom of your second paragraph. I have a niece, and she and her friend went to Paris, France last summer and all my niece talked about was her friend being glued to her cell phone and iPod and other technological devices instead of exploring history landmarks. It's like in the first National Treasure where Nicolas Cage is reading the Declaration of...
user's latest post:
Who is this a picture of?
Published (2010-01-03 20:51:00)
I sincerely apologize. I was joking. I don't know either and thought why not make some fun with it. Sorry.
user's latest post:
Still Rolling My Eyes
Published (2009-12-27 21:46:00)
No sweetie, It's still an opinion. Regardless of how strongly you may feel about it or how much you want to prove your observations are correct. -Not everyone; just maybe 99.999999% of them deserve to be flat-heads.
user's latest post:
Plank in Queen Elizabeth...
Published (2009-12-28 21:04:00)
Was that a real templar treasure that they found underneath a church in New York? It's a *beep* movie, of course it's fake you bimbo.
user's latest post:
Plot holes, mistakes, and...
Published (2009-12-30 22:51:00)
Yes, I watch the history channel too. I assume this is the extent of the research that you speak of. You are quite clearly the better researcher, I was most impressed by your cry of 'Nuh-Uh!' to my comment, sheer genius, that shows leadership son, you should run for comptroller or something.
user's latest post:
Which audience is this movie...
Published (2009-12-30 20:19:00)
I hate it when people see Disney and think "kids" Exactly. I mean look at Pirates, is that meant for kids? No. This movie is made for people who enjoy adventure films without taking it seriously. BFWA! I am zee bomb!
user's latest post:
Plot holes, mistakes, and...
Published (2009-12-31 12:20:00)
The one that always bothered me the most: If the Presidential Book is so important, why would they keep it in the Library of Congress where anybody could theorertically find it? One would think it would be stored in a safe in the Oval Office or something.
user's latest post:
HIS NAME IS MUDD
Published (2010-01-02 08:43:00)
My name is mud, not to be confused with Bill Or Jack or Pete or Dennis My name is mud and it's always been Dictionary.com ppl
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007) during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007):
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007):
Started 2 days, 20 hours ago (2010-01-03 09:49:00)
by matorei
Started 3 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-12-14 10:51:00)
by Spider-Lou-Chapter-2
At first when he said it, it sounded reasonable. Then, a couple of minutes later I thought, "nahhh, movies don't know sh_t."
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur1476309/comments-index? start=0&summary= off&order=date
Started 10 months, 2 weeks ago (2009-02-24 12:59:00)
by wd_40
Thank you for your opinion.
Not sure why I actually have to respond, but I will. Did you see the first? If so, how is this movie anymore of a stretch of the imagination? These are like serialized Hardy Boys novels. They have decent acting, over-the-top moments and great pacing. Throwaway movies, but still harmless. I enjoy them, but I am a sucker for action movies, and I love Cage. *...
Started 1 year, 7 months ago (2008-06-05 07:21:00)
by mozain
1) During the "car chase" there were no cops present
2) Inside the Oval Office, Connor had no problem with Gates going over to the resolute desk by himself
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-11-08 04:37:00)
by Les_Luthiers
this movie was made for the same audience that enjoyed Scooby-Doo and Space Chimps. Meaning: Little kids and adults who are fans of meaningless and nonsensical flicks.
This movie just as its predecessor sux big time.
2/10
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-11-22 00:16:00)
by polomasta
Started 1 year, 2 months ago (2008-10-19 23:44:00)
by chuck_dickman
Started 1 week, 6 days ago (2009-12-23 20:20:00)
by BouncyX
it was a native american civilization so it still works.
plausible?...not in the least but it works. lol
Started 1 week, 6 days ago (2009-12-23 20:17:00)
by BouncyX
i can't confirm since i never watched that show but if both the movie and show were filmed in the same area, its very possible they just both used the same location.
there's this one building in los angeles that has a circular room with a very noticeable pattern on the floor that i've seen used in everthing from tv series to movies to even porn.
so yeah it might just be a "same location" ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on IMDB - National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007):
Started 2 days, 20 hours ago (2010-01-03 09:49:00)
by matorei
Started 1 year, 7 months ago (2008-06-05 07:21:00)
by mozain
1) During the "car chase" there were no cops present
2) Inside the Oval Office, Connor had no problem with Gates going over to the resolute desk by himself
Started 10 months, 2 weeks ago (2009-02-24 12:59:00)
by wd_40
Thank you for your opinion.
Not sure why I actually have to respond, but I will. Did you see the first? If so, how is this movie anymore of a stretch of the imagination? These are like serialized Hardy Boys novels. They have decent acting, over-the-top moments and great pacing. Throwaway movies, but still harmless. I enjoy them, but I am a sucker for action movies, and I love Cage. *...
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-11-22 00:16:00)
by polomasta
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-11-08 04:37:00)
by Les_Luthiers
this movie was made for the same audience that enjoyed Scooby-Doo and Space Chimps. Meaning: Little kids and adults who are fans of meaningless and nonsensical flicks.
This movie just as its predecessor sux big time.
2/10
Started 3 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-12-14 10:51:00)
by Spider-Lou-Chapter-2
At first when he said it, it sounded reasonable. Then, a couple of minutes later I thought, "nahhh, movies don't know sh_t."
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur1476309/comments-index? start=0&summary= off&order=date
|
|
Size: 8 bytes
