|
More site info...
Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics - www.flickr.com/groups/nikond700/ | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond700/.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond700/.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond700/ is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
98
|
334
|
1,488
|
|
Post:
|
604
|
2,419
|
6,617
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics (http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond700/)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics posting activity graph:
|
|
http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikond700/ Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics during last week:
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Wide Prime...
Published (2009-12-16 13:08:00)
14-24-50 is a good FOV spread. (35 would be too close to the 50 and too far from the 14.) 20-35-50 would make sense, as well.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Clearance...
Published (2009-12-16 03:09:00)
Yeah, and after you buy for a few dollars more you will never even know it is gone. I agree with ND, anything under 3K for this camera is a bargain. It is awesome
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing backpacking...
Published (2009-12-16 18:08:00)
Don't listen to the naysayers! There's a lot to see by getting out into the world. Carry your camera in a crappy-looking, tattered, weather-beaten knapsack and it should be okay. If your bag looks poor, people will assume there is nothing in it that they would want to steal. Be mindful of it wherever you go, and hide it well if you have to leave it somewhere -- it will be okay. Go light on the lenses, though. Maybe a 20 and a 35-70....
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing nikon 105 f/2...
Published (2009-12-16 23:08:00)
vida... the 135mm will be a better bet for weddings... you can use it for tight portraits... and a LOT of great photographers I know use it in exchange for the 70-200 zoom for ceremony shots... it would help keep your bag a little lighter...
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Wide Prime...
Published (2009-12-16 09:08:00)
Given you have a 14 and a 50, of your two options I would pick the 24mm 2.8. That said, if you left the choice wide open, I would probably look for a 20mm 2.8
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing backpacking...
Published (2009-12-16 18:08:00)
athletic, 6' times 3? bring the d700! i wish i brought the d700 with me to italy. bring lots spare cf cards(or shoot jpeg;) ) if yo're not bringing a netbook or somekind of external hdd. and maybe bring permethrin or pyrinyl. lol...
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Lens hack in...
Published (2009-12-10 18:28:00)
First of all, should you really open a new thread for this kind of crap? Second, why didn't you say it's about the 70-200 lens? Third, if you really don't care, don't post it. And fourth: why on earth are you discussing this in the D700 group? There are lots of nice groups you can also troll: There's the Nikkor group, the 70-200 group etc etc.
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics:
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics:
Started 1 day, 12 hours ago (2009-12-16 22:06:00)
by The Joey
I find it interesting that people do unload the 85mm on a somewhat regular basis. I've been using the 85 1.8 and I love it, but it has limits. Not long enough--too long. So I'm looking at zooms to get to the next level of what I'm doing. Kind of a trend I'm seeing as well.
Started 22 hours, 5 minutes ago (2009-12-17 12:17:00)
by nakeddork
I use fast glass 100% of the time.
Lawlz...18-200!
Started 1 day, 2 hours ago (2009-12-17 08:17:00)
by summicron 35mm
Started 13 hours, 3 minutes ago (2009-12-17 21:19:00)
by nakeddork
Nd
Can we move the deadline up? ...to let's say, tomorrow?
Started 2 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-12-02 19:03:38)
by Nikon+Apple=happy
Reserved, at last a topic I can shoot without leaving the house!
Me, lazy?
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-12-07 19:23:00)
by pybarrondo
fEE is the message you should see if the lens is not locked at maximum aperture. So I think you can rule out the aperture lock issue.
The message you get means "no lens attached or non-CPU lens attached without specifying maximum aperture." Since the 28-90 is a cpu lens, and since the 70-200 also gets the same error message, it seems like that narrows the issue down to "no lens ...
Started 18 hours, 4 minutes ago (2009-12-17 16:18:00)
by Eye of Searle
Nikon 180 2. 8 AF? Not that light or small but an outstanding lens. Definitely smaller and lighter than the 70-200 2.8.
Started 15 hours, 4 minutes ago (2009-12-17 19:18:00)
by nakeddork
So you have a sense of urgancy to fill it out. Thus, making the lens non-returnable.
At least that's the philosophy of Cameta Camera. Beware of Cameta Camera! You've been warned.
Started 9 months, 2 weeks ago (2009-03-06 00:00:00)
by RuslanK
I man-handled one at the local shop the other day. It's really well built, no question about it. Much nicer than the other models, but that's expected for a camera of the D700 level.
Started 2 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-16 04:07:00)
by cteteris
I might use them if I was shooting jpg and felt the need for either of them
but mostly just too lazy to experiment, and pretty much always shoot RAW
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Flickr: Nikon D700 discussion topics:
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-09 16:01:00)
by nakeddork
Started 2 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-12-02 19:03:38)
by Nikon+Apple=happy
Reserved, at last a topic I can shoot without leaving the house!
Me, lazy?
Started 1 day, 12 hours ago (2009-12-16 22:06:00)
by The Joey
I find it interesting that people do unload the 85mm on a somewhat regular basis. I've been using the 85 1.8 and I love it, but it has limits. Not long enough--too long. So I'm looking at zooms to get to the next level of what I'm doing. Kind of a trend I'm seeing as well.
Started 5 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-13 04:17:00)
by Fred Frognier
The best macro lens (to me) is the Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 Micro.
But it's almost 800 $...
Started 2 days, 5 hours ago (2009-12-16 05:08:00)
by CollardGreens
Backpacking...hostels...E Europe...better bring a throw-away camera ! I would not undertake the trip you are planning at all - but then I am old and like comfort ! I live and work in the places you plan to visit...believe me, take a point and shoot throw away that you can take with you everywhere (even to the toilet). Plan to be pick-pocketed at least once. Sorry but that is the ...
Started 22 hours, 5 minutes ago (2009-12-17 12:17:00)
by nakeddork
I use fast glass 100% of the time.
Lawlz...18-200!
Started 1 week ago (2009-12-10 12:28:00)
by andy.wolf
Started 3 days, 17 hours ago (2009-12-14 16:25:00)
by mtwin76
Here's another one that's just not that sharp.
Started 4 days, 23 hours ago (2009-12-13 11:17:00)
by The Joey
Depends on what is really a deal as I see it. Ritz is more than B&H, but you can pay it off with no interest over 12 months. Factor the declining value of the dollar, and prices will adjust accordingly.
Started 3 days, 22 hours ago (2009-12-14 11:50:00)
by Nikon+Apple=happy
400mm shouldn't be a problem for portraits if
a) you have LOTS of room to work in, and
b) You don't mind shouting at your subject
;)
|
|
Size: 331 bytes
