|
More site info...
Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group - www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/ | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/ is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
149
|
560
|
1,751
|
|
Post:
|
1,242
|
4,367
|
12,193
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group (http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group posting activity graph:
|
|
http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/ Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group during last week:
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing 50D...
Published (2009-11-11 20:02:39)
Scuba - I'm not sure that bbf has much influence here...? It's possible the AF got set there, but the OP is in MF mode.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Image...
Published (2009-11-11 21:06:52)
I believe, as far as noise goes, the 1D2 is not a great performer. ISO 400 is fairly noisy especially shooting against a blue sky and in the shadows. I have a very good friend with a 1D3, and he can easily shoot at ISO 800 nearly noise free so I think there was a big push in that direction with the 1D3.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing HELP! Crazy...
Published (2009-11-10 21:13:14)
A worrisome thing is that the OP seems to be merely a teenager. I hope she got some firm guidance convincing her not to do this.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing 50L vs 35L:...
Published (2009-11-11 20:41:07)
True enough. After all the 50 can do things the 35 can't. In my opinion, the 35 being sharper and better at focusing makes it superior. I guess it depends on what you need.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing 50L vs 35L:...
Published (2009-11-11 19:09:07)
Depends what you mean by superior doesn't it? The 35 is sharper wide open, but the 50 is slightly faster and renders OOF areas sumptuously. One is noticeably wider than the other and the 50 has a recognised focusing flaw. Both superb lenses.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Can I geek...
Published (2009-11-11 09:12:26)
Yeah, I can see the batch convert coming in handy when you find that your last 30 shots have all been improperly exposed, like I've done. Well, usually I don't get more than 5 in before I catch it, but still. Or for white balance, or if you want to desaturate all of them... I can see the need for that. Thank you folks for taking the time to explain this stuff to a newbie. :) Much appreciated.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Image...
Published (2009-11-11 09:08:51)
Shows it's not always true that you get what you pay for. I think this is the most expensive EF-S lens there is.
user's latest post:
Flickr: Discussing Lens wont...
Published (2009-11-11 09:11:35)
Also, many lenses will exhibit this behavior when they have trouble achieving focus, for several reasons. For instance: 1) not enough light 2) not enough contrast in the focus area (for instance, trying to focus on a blank wall) (You didn't mention your situation -- what you were trying to focus on -- so I brought these up just in case.)
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group:
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group:
Started 1 year, 2 months ago (2008-08-23 03:36:57)
by Michael Nagel
The IS unit on my 17-55 started to act up after nearly 2 years of service. The view jumped around like crazy for a moment after activation, and after three to five shots the lens completely stopped working, no IS, no autofocus, no aperture changes. The camera showed 00 as the aperture value, almost like a lens software crash. I could only reset it by unmounting the lens. The repair on ...
Started 3 days, 4 hours ago (2009-11-11 19:09:07)
by Spacemunkie
Depends what you mean by superior doesn't it?
The 35 is sharper wide open, but the 50 is slightly faster and renders OOF areas sumptuously. One is noticeably wider than the other and the 50 has a recognised focusing flaw.
Both superb lenses.
Started 6 days, 4 hours ago (2009-11-08 19:26:32)
by Zen Braden
Started 3 days, 4 hours ago (2009-11-11 19:09:39)
by BoldPuppy
Put it in AI Servo, then go to MF.
One shot won't let it take a shot without focus confirm. AI Servo will.
Started 3 days, 5 hours ago (2009-11-11 18:10:14)
by MisterSqueeze
at f/8 I doubt you'd see much difference, especially if not pixel peeping. All of these lenses should be at close to their sharpest at f/5.6 - f/8 and I'm sure there are charts and tests "proving" that. Oddly, the nifty fifty shot looks under exposed by at least a stop. In a real world situation, all 3 of these lenses should provide different tools, yet at similar focal lengths and ...
Started 2 weeks, 6 days ago (2009-10-25 05:18:08)
by Ian H's
I have both 400D and 5D2. I personally would always go for the FF 5D2. All the gadgets and functions etc can't make up for having a bigger sensor. To me the sensor is an important link in the chain just like good glass. All the other functions can usually be made up for by good technique.
Started 3 days, 11 hours ago (2009-11-11 12:10:29)
by Transiently permanent
I thought it was cool when it first went up.
Started 4 days, 6 hours ago (2009-11-10 17:11:19)
by IMPRINT Photography
Great question! I was recommended "Hot Shoe Diaries" however I have the Canon system. I realise that similar principles apply but it would be great to have a camera specific book using Off Camera Flash.
Started 5 days, 15 hours ago (2009-11-09 08:23:11)
by Joe Cocker
Dance recitals. No flash, fast movement and very dark.
Max the ISO, largest aperture, and hope that your hardly hand holdable shutter speed is fast enough to stop movement.
In your situation you could use hdr.
Started 3 days, 18 hours ago (2009-11-11 05:11:35)
by beanie67
Thanks for the reply ,anything special to use
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Flickr: Canon DSLR User Group:
Started 4 days, 8 hours ago (2009-11-10 15:12:24)
by dulgee
A new Convert! welcome Brother.
Started 5 days, 9 hours ago (2009-11-09 14:24:01)
by Daniel McAvoy
If you can actually check it in person and hand over the money for it there and then.
By all means do it. You have just got the bargain of the century.
Started 5 days, 15 hours ago (2009-11-09 08:23:11)
by Joe Cocker
Dance recitals. No flash, fast movement and very dark.
Max the ISO, largest aperture, and hope that your hardly hand holdable shutter speed is fast enough to stop movement.
In your situation you could use hdr.
Started 6 days, 4 hours ago (2009-11-08 19:24:51)
by larry.green40
I just downloaded Adobe Premiere Elements 8 trial version and the movies won't play there either..It's like watching movies from the 1920's..
Also D/L VLC media player...no luck with that one either..
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-06 01:33:02)
by dulgee
you shot this at f/22... it is a flat object on a flat background... not much Depth is necessary...
the problem with small apertures like that (especially on high pixel density filters, like on your 7D) is at a certain point Diffraction starts to take affect and brings softness to an image.
You should have better results at F/8, or if you can get away with it, even f/5.6 (...
Started 6 days, 4 hours ago (2009-11-08 19:26:32)
by Zen Braden
Started 6 days, 2 hours ago (2009-11-08 21:25:59)
by Jalexsmith
Did you have a filter on the front of the lens? Often these reflections are caused by light reflecting off of the sensor back to the filter, then back down to the sensor again.
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-06 14:32:41)
by E Martin Photo
I was thinking I might need to bring it for the reach, but didn't want to be worrying about all that extra weight and bulk.
Started 1 year, 2 months ago (2008-08-23 03:36:57)
by Michael Nagel
The IS unit on my 17-55 started to act up after nearly 2 years of service. The view jumped around like crazy for a moment after activation, and after three to five shots the lens completely stopped working, no IS, no autofocus, no aperture changes. The camera showed 00 as the aperture value, almost like a lens software crash. I could only reset it by unmounting the lens. The repair on ...
Started 6 days, 3 hours ago (2009-11-08 19:27:37)
by Dixon Marshall
dulgee
That's another thing to consider, but I'm talking about studio portrait photography. Still, you might have a valid point for shooting photographing small children.
|
|
Size: 649 bytes
