|
More site info...
Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum - www.amazon.com/tag/evolution/forum/ | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://www.amazon.com/tag/evolution/forum/.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://www.amazon.com/tag/evolution/forum/.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://www.amazon.com/tag/evolution/forum/ is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
7
|
23
|
208
|
|
Post:
|
10
|
64
|
2,132
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum (http://www.amazon.com/tag/evolution/forum/)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum posting activity graph:
|
|
http://www.amazon.com/tag/evolution/forum/ Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum during last week:
user's latest post:
Hitler and Stalin believed in...
Published (2009-12-24 10:02:00)
Benn, I'm going to assume that you meant science has NOW shown, rather than NOT shown, since otherwise your post is a complete hash. Not sure what your reference is for that assertion, but it misses a rather crucial point: It is true that mitochondrial DNA can be traced to a single hypothetical "Eve" and the Y chromosome can be traced to a single hypothetical "Adam," but these two hypothetical humans...
user's latest post:
How does evolution / natural...
Published (2009-12-23 06:54:00)
"...from a standpoint of natural selection, why would humans develop this trait / ability seeing as it doesn't seem to contribute to our ability to pass on our genes?" Robert, I think NDE and OOBE are interesting phenomena, but the framework of natural selection is probably not very useful for studying them. Exactly as you suggest, it's hard to see how they'd relate to survival and reproduction. To the best of...
user's latest post:
Hitler and Stalin believed in...
Published (2009-12-26 15:07:00)
@ W. N. Kerney: Why are Darwinist nasty people? Why are you afraid of of a well founded opinion? Why do you not see truth in all the facts? 6 billion people on this planet. Thousands of religions and gods. And the only true God is the one in the bible? Those nasty christians in the south, ture belivers in God, who held slaves? The clerus in europe, who over 1500 years lived in prosper and welth while the peasants lived in mud and dirt? An...
user's latest post:
How does evolution / natural...
Published (2009-12-28 09:03:00)
Why did we "evolve" the ability to contract cancer? Why did we "evolve" the ability to lose our hair? These are pointless questions meant to vaguely suggest that there is more going on than there really is. It is like the arguments made by conspiracy theorists who say "isn't it a strange coincidence that..." Without offering any evidence of anything, really. The fact is, SOME people...
user's latest post:
How does evolution / natural...
Published (2009-12-28 13:27:00)
"a "side effect" of evolution?" A spandrel: the non-adaptive byproduct of another evolutionary adaptation. Then you say "humans have been selectively..." - selected by who? Who made the machinery? " Non-random elimination of alleles from the gene pool of a reproductively isolated population. "Selection" is often mistakenly criticised by some scientists, or...
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum:
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum:
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2009-11-24 12:40:00)
by J. Paul
An alternative question would be: does it detract from our ability to pass on our genes? If the answer is 'no', one might conclude that this is a 'side effect' of evolution; certainly humans have been selectively favored for complex intelligence, and this sort of phenomenon may come along with that machinery. If I were to take a complex man-made machine, say a computer, and put it into an ...
Started 2 months, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-06 07:41:00)
by John McClain
Thank you for highlighting this hilarious garbage.
Started 5 months ago (2009-08-04 20:21:00)
by Stephen P. Smith
I think the problem that you face is that there is no homogenous group that can be caricatured "creationists." For example, I definitely am not a creationists, but I believe Darwin`s theory of evolution (by natural selection and random mutation) is wrong. On the other hand, I believe evolution is real, it is only that its not Darwin`s evolution. The modern synthesis is wrong too, in that it...
Started 8 months, 1 week ago (2009-04-28 11:53:00)
by MartyM
Yes, the same has happened to me. I was approached about Creationism over a year ago from several people. I never really believed it literally speaking, but did not know the details. So when I received Hovind's video series from a friend I started looking into many of the arguments and seeing what the scientific community says about them. This led me to the same conclusion as you and I ...
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2009-11-22 12:36:00)
by Corky
Started 10 months, 2 weeks ago (2009-02-18 15:07:00)
by Frank A. Giammanco
The only problem with your post, Nate, is that no creationist will ever read it because they're not big on well-thought-out arguments or, well, reading in general...
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2009-10-22 23:11:00)
by Nontheistdavid
OUCH! I have not the slightest clue how one can maintain such disturbing beliefs and actually want them to be true. Why would any rational being even WANT this insane, almost farcical religion to be true? It would be no better then Descartes evil demon deceiving you into believing an external world exist. A nightmare. A true universal hell that you could never wake up from, yet these people...
Started 5 months ago (2009-07-31 05:17:00)
by A. Jordan
Individual biologists might "admit," suspect or feel that humans have souls, but how would the field of biology go about establishing their existence, much less studying them?
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2009-10-26 09:04:00)
by DonJ
The best thing I have ever seen on it is Dawkins' "The Ancestor's Tale" The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution He starts with modern man and works backwards. It was written a few years ago so it might not have the latest stuff though.
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-11-04 11:37:00)
by Lars Zachariasen
"Exactly how much more evidence of evolution and speciation is needed" But it's still a virus, not, like, an eggplant or something.
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Amazon.com: evolution Discussion Forum:
Started 2 months, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-06 07:41:00)
by John McClain
Thank you for highlighting this hilarious garbage.
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2009-11-24 12:40:00)
by J. Paul
An alternative question would be: does it detract from our ability to pass on our genes? If the answer is 'no', one might conclude that this is a 'side effect' of evolution; certainly humans have been selectively favored for complex intelligence, and this sort of phenomenon may come along with that machinery. If I were to take a complex man-made machine, say a computer, and put it into an ...
|
|