|
More site info...
Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum - www.amazon.com/tag/buddhism/forum/ | Site profile
|
|
Site profile page for http://www.amazon.com/tag/buddhism/forum/.
This report page has aggregated and summarized the online discussions from the Message Board located at http://www.amazon.com/tag/buddhism/forum/.
This site profile page outlines general site statistics such as: Users Activity, Site Activity, Site Rank, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional site profile information for http://www.amazon.com/tag/buddhism/forum/ is also shown in the following divisions:
1) Top 10 Active Forums during Last Week
2) Top 10 Site Forums
3) Latest Active Threads
4) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a site's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity table on Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
36
|
112
|
235
|
|
Post:
|
153
|
525
|
955
|
|
|
Authority Badge:
|
|
|
BoardReader Authority Badge code for Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum (http://www.amazon.com/tag/buddhism/forum/)
|
|
Put this code anywhere on your forum page:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating - The position measured by activity among all forum sites tracked by BoardReader.
If rating is 10 there are 9 forum sites which have higher activity.
Posts - Number of posts on forum site during last 7 days.
Threads - Number of threads on forum site active during last 7 days.
Authors - Number of authors which contributed to the site within last 7 days.
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum posting activity graph:
|
|
http://www.amazon.com/tag/buddhism/forum/ Alexa graph:
|
Top authors on Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum during last week:
user's latest post:
Yet again, Denise insists show...
Published (2010-01-05 23:20:00)
Boy, Denise has plenty of time and energy to throw around idiotic insults in other threads, but she just can't manage to answer two simple questions about her own statements. You are doing nothing but proving my point, Denise: you have no idea what you're talking about. Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle, Denise. Wriggle, wriggle.
user's latest post:
Famous Sinhalese Pali scholar...
Published (2010-01-05 22:45:00)
genuine sophistic scum of the lowest order will take a citation, or a quote of a "praise of X", and wear it into the dirt via sophistry to the point that another idiot will conclude that said citational "praise of X" was not only NOT a praise of X, but likely a complete rejection of X in earnest. This is the debasement and vile nature of sophist illusionists & belly locomotes such as who Cane wander...
user's latest post:
Famous Sinhalese Pali scholar...
Published (2010-01-05 19:35:00)
I think Denise's relationship with TWR is just darling. But he/she may be begining to tick off TWR. I notice recently that TWR has in many instances dropped the "Mr. Wheeler" and now simply has referred to "Wheeler". Breakin' up is hard to do Denise, but we're all with you on this one!
user's latest post:
Famous Sinhalese Pali scholar...
Published (2010-01-05 12:03:00)
Mr. Wheeler, I'd be happy if you gave us a specific (book, page number) reference for this note by Nakamura, since it would definitely obviate much of this controversy, even though J. Cane still says in one of his four lengthy posts on how to determine what Buddhadatta thinks (or how not to, as the case may be) that he doesn't care what he (Buddhadatta) thinks. It would at the very least suggest that Buddadatta may actually have had...
user's latest post:
Game over Denise
Published (2010-01-04 18:55:00)
JimBeau, please let me see if I can rephrase what I think you are saying in this and the next post, and you can tell me if I understand you correctly. You seem to be saying in this first post that there is a self made up of aggregates and that is *not* the self that brings about suffering. In the second post you seem to be saying that there is a permanent self people cling to? "Clinging to such a permanent self?"
user's latest post:
Madhyamika as absolute nihilism;...
Published (2010-01-01 20:18:00)
Folks, it seems to me this discussion is not what it purports to be. I think it is not a discussion of Buddhist and Vedanta philosophy, but an attempt of one person to aggrandize (is that a word?) themselves. (Checking out Denise's other reviews on Amazon will clarify her personality.) I suggest continued engagement is a waste of time. And no, I won't be checking back to see if anyone comments on my post.
user's latest post:
Game over Denise
Published (2009-12-27 13:29:00)
He who knows doesn't say. He who says, doesn't know. Who said that.....?
user's latest post:
Madhyamika as absolute nihilism;...
Published (2009-12-31 14:07:00)
this thread is a great example of a troll (Denise) getting owned severely and then trying to save face by changing the subject, haaaa. btw J. Cane, it's obvious that Denise has mental problems, why waste your time? Surely you would fare better by meditating, studying more dharma, and discussing with people that have potential of waking up sometime soon.
user's latest post:
Game over Denise
Published (2010-01-01 10:11:00)
This is near to impossible to comprehend on any level. There is only one God, however you choose to acknowledge him/her. Lighten up and be grateful!
|
|
|
Top 10 active forums on Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum during last week:
|
|
Top 10 forums on Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum:
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum:
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-30 09:51:00)
by JimBeau
The Scumbag Idiot TOAD Denise Andersen has broken the peace we enjoyed over Christmas with his idiotic Bull**** Posts. Why did I know he would be the first...because he has done it several times in the past. He cannot hold his own gas, and uses this forum to vent it. At heart he is a very sad and lonely excuse for a human being. I have him on Ignore and do not engage him directly. I ...
Started 1 day, 17 hours ago (2010-01-05 20:34:00)
by J. Cane
Apparently Denise has decided to try to wriggle like an eel to avoid answering for her own claims. If I were here, given her track record of doing nothing but reveal her ignorance and dishonesty any time that she is challenged, I'd be tempted to squirm and wriggle, too, though I wouldn't. But then again, I'm an adult who isn't threatened to the core of my being by admitting that there are ...
Started 2 days, 8 hours ago (2010-01-05 04:54:00)
by Denise Anderson
Cane spews----When someone says 'where's your unicorn?' (atman) And you keep asserting that you "never denied the atman" Are we to take your assertion that the atman is syn. with a Unicorn (something utterly unreal)? Your A doesnt match your B You and your atman-denying heathen Jim-Bo remind me of the philosopher who said of the nihilist as regards the atman, they are----- "like the ...
Started 3 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-12-15 15:35:00)
by Denise Anderson
Brendan states-----------In Buddhism, ALL phenomena are in a state of constant flux driven by surrounding causes and conditions. This utterly rules out the possibility of a permanent abiding atman. Hold on there son, what you said above is EXACTLY THE SAME and no different than what Advaita and the Upanishads say. The nature of phenomena is not in question, it is "empty of the atman, is ...
Started 2 weeks, 5 days ago (2009-12-18 23:07:00)
by J. Cane
It is striking how much Ms. Denise Anderson lets the insults flow against everyone, rather than addressing any of the issues here or in any of the other pending threads. What is she so afraid of? Why is she wriggling so much to get out of her own statements and claims? Really, Denise. What exactly are you so afraid of that you can't address your own claims?
Started 3 days, 18 hours ago (2010-01-03 19:42:00)
by J. Cane
Just out of curiosity, Ms. Anderson, were you ever going to address this? Or do you find it too offensive that I've pointed out your ignorance again?
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2009-11-25 18:17:00)
by Denise Anderson
[Deleted by Amazon on Nov 25, 2009 6:17 PM PST]
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Amazon.com: buddhism Discussion Forum:
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-30 09:51:00)
by JimBeau
The Scumbag Idiot TOAD Denise Andersen has broken the peace we enjoyed over Christmas with his idiotic Bull**** Posts. Why did I know he would be the first...because he has done it several times in the past. He cannot hold his own gas, and uses this forum to vent it. At heart he is a very sad and lonely excuse for a human being. I have him on Ignore and do not engage him directly. I ...
Started 3 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-12-15 15:35:00)
by Denise Anderson
Brendan states-----------In Buddhism, ALL phenomena are in a state of constant flux driven by surrounding causes and conditions. This utterly rules out the possibility of a permanent abiding atman. Hold on there son, what you said above is EXACTLY THE SAME and no different than what Advaita and the Upanishads say. The nature of phenomena is not in question, it is "empty of the atman, is ...
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2009-11-25 18:17:00)
by Denise Anderson
[Deleted by Amazon on Nov 25, 2009 6:17 PM PST]
Started 2 days, 8 hours ago (2010-01-05 04:54:00)
by Denise Anderson
Cane spews----When someone says 'where's your unicorn?' (atman) And you keep asserting that you "never denied the atman" Are we to take your assertion that the atman is syn. with a Unicorn (something utterly unreal)? Your A doesnt match your B You and your atman-denying heathen Jim-Bo remind me of the philosopher who said of the nihilist as regards the atman, they are----- "like the ...
Started 2 weeks, 3 days ago (2009-12-21 10:59:00)
by J. Cane
5) The number of rules shall not exceed 1. 6) Furthermore, since we are limited to 1 rule, that rule shall be #7. 7) Rule #3 is the only rule.
Started 5 days, 19 hours ago (2010-01-01 18:32:00)
by Denise Anderson
Lets count Jim Beau's many many lies.......... ***Jim Beau's LIE #1 The Buddha gained a following because he taught a way of reaching liberation that did not involve the attan at all Baseless claim unfounded in doctrine. The entire locus of immortality (amata) and liberation in Buddhism IS THE ATTAN (skt. Atman), .....as such, you've nothing but lies Atta'sarana anan'n'asarana.--------"...
Started 1 day, 17 hours ago (2010-01-05 20:34:00)
by J. Cane
Apparently Denise has decided to try to wriggle like an eel to avoid answering for her own claims. If I were here, given her track record of doing nothing but reveal her ignorance and dishonesty any time that she is challenged, I'd be tempted to squirm and wriggle, too, though I wouldn't. But then again, I'm an adult who isn't threatened to the core of my being by admitting that there are ...
Started 5 months, 3 weeks ago (2009-07-16 06:24:00)
by Denise Anderson
Dear amazon.com, we are upset that someone came into buddhism discussion and started discussing buddhism!! Horrific! I mean, jeez, we all want to talk about OUR opinions, not buddhism!!! Jeez man! Like, come on, jeez, whats with this doctrine nonsense, its like, jeez, theres a buddhist fundie in here, its totally crashing my cool. "if you cant debate them, ban them"- from the book ...
|
|
Size: 925 bytes
