|
More site info...
Traditional Aircraft Engines | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for Traditional Aircraft Engines on http://www.vansairforce.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Traditional Aircraft Engines, located on the Message Board at http://www.vansairforce.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Traditional Aircraft Engines" on the Message Board at http://www.vansairforce.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Traditional Aircraft Engines:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
12
|
71
|
229
|
|
Post:
|
41
|
246
|
815
|
|
|
Traditional Aircraft Engines Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Distance between exhaust and...
Published (2009-11-02 10:24:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by N941WR Kelly, The others will probably add something to this but what you don't want is your fuel lines to have any "pouches" in them. By that, I'm saying the fuel lines should be heading down hill all the time so there is no place to accumulate water or sediment. One exception to that, the lines may run up hill from the gascolator and then down to the carb. Any water/sdiment left in the...
user's latest post:
What would you do? - Page 2 -...
Published (2009-11-03 12:54:00)
All, Thanks for the replies and opinions. I spoke to Bill Middlebrook this morning from Penn Yan and he indicated that it is not that big a deal to place the plug,gear, and govenor housing at a later date if I decide to go CS in the future. The L2A model is one of the newer manufactured Lyc's used by the 172R-SP which are configured with two accesory (vaccum/haudraulic) pads on the accesory housing. Bill suggested to leave as is and if I...
user's latest post:
Exhaust, ready to cut (or...
Published (2009-11-02 06:17:00)
Although I would like my plane to go as fast as possible, speed is not my main reason to cut the pipes. I was thinking that by cutting the pipes, I would of course reduce the weight, but there would also be less weight (and less length) to vibrate and damage the welding of the exhaust or the mufflers. One important thing to consider when cutting the exhaust short is that the floor will get hot(ter) Because the fuel lines are running in the...
user's latest post:
Exhaust, ready to cut (or...
Published (2009-11-02 08:00:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Kevin Horton A recent post presented results from two tests in the same configuration where speeds differed by 1.5 kt. A fraction of a knot speed increase is well within the noise of the test results, so it is pretty much impossible to measure. You'd need to do a large number of runs in each configuration, and average lots of data, to measure a speed increase of a fraction of a knot and have confidence in the...
user's latest post:
What would you do?
Published (2009-11-03 08:13:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by snoop9erdog I have decided to purchase a IO-360-L2A from Penn Yan Aero. The question is whether or not to have Penn Yan modify it to allow for constant speed operation by placing a plug in the crank and installing a governor gear and housing. Now is the time to do it if I'm going to (for extra $500). If I change it it will certainly void the TC and make it an experimental engine only. My original intention was...
user's latest post:
Distance between exhaust and...
Published (2009-11-02 10:17:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by ArVeeNiner ... If I remember correctly, either it wants to be mounted horizontal and the carb inlet wants the line coming in horizontally or with a slight downwards slope. I have to check my paperwork when I get home. Does this sound correct? Thanks again. Kelly, The others will probably add something to this but what you don't want is your fuel lines to have any "pouches" in them. By that,...
user's latest post:
The 30 year pickled engine results
Published (2009-10-31 11:44:00)
Hi All, Last fall, I posted a few pics of an IO-360A1B that I purchased that had 0 SMOH, but was pickled in 1980 in Colorado. Well, I was pretty certain, that since I was taking myself, my wife, my kids, etc in this airplane to be, the engine required a tear down. So...off to Aerosport power, for teardown, inspection, and reassembly. As a recap, here it is before: Here is the case inside: Corrosion was pretty much non-existant according to...
user's latest post:
0-320 crankshaft part numbers,...
Published (2009-11-03 15:02:00)
There are hollow shafts for constant speed, solid shaft for aerobatic aircraft(not constant speed compatable), flanges with and without lightening holes. There are supposedly thicker flanges for aerobatics. Otherwise, leaving out the H models, as far as I can determine, any crank will fit any case. I am going the same route as you, I have a junk crank with lightening holes and a good crank without and as far as I can determine they are both...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Traditional Aircraft Engines::
Started 2 weeks ago (2009-10-27 07:25:00)
by F1Boss
It might work (only sue to its location) -- but this type of intake does not generally produce any MP increase on piston engine intake systems due to 'ram effect'. You would be better off with a scoop sized to about 2x the fuel controller throat area, and try to include an expansion area that allows the air to slow a bit, but it would seem to me that this won't be possible in this particular ...
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-03 15:02:00)
by jrs14855
There are hollow shafts for constant speed, solid shaft for aerobatic aircraft(not constant speed compatable), flanges with and without lightening holes. There are supposedly thicker flanges for aerobatics. Otherwise, leaving out the H models, as far as I can determine, any crank will fit any case. I am going the same route as you, I have a junk crank with lightening holes and a good crank ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-02 14:04:00)
by Calvin25
The extra $500 today will come back 10 fold if you decide to ever sell it
or go CS; I would do it.
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-01 12:46:00)
by Sam Buchanan
If this was my plane, I would not trim the pipes. Shorter pipes will add the complications you mentioned without any benefits.
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-02 07:39:00)
by DanH
Kelly,
Too close. Not enough photos/angles to offer a concrete suggestion, but you can do better.
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-10-31 12:59:00)
by RVnoob
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-01 08:17:00)
by Mel
The mag is "HOT" when the "P" lead is open, i.e. switch "OFF". Turn the switch on to ground and "kill" the mag.
Typically a SPST switch is installed upside-down so that the mag is "HOT" with the switch in the up position.
Started 1 week, 6 days ago (2009-10-28 16:34:00)
by jrouault
You should be able to find a narrow socket at Home Depot or Lowes that will work. My standard sockets did not fit either.
Started 1 week, 4 days ago (2009-10-30 09:26:00)
by N941WR
Tony,
Since you are an A&P, why not use the P part of that license and build up an ECi Kit engine and save yourself a stack of bills.
Started 1 week, 5 days ago (2009-10-29 17:23:00)
by Mel
The Type 2 dynafocal is for the IO-320 as used in a Twin Comanche with a
long prop extension. The shallower angle was to handle the C/G being more
forward on that engine/prop combination.
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Traditional Aircraft Engines::
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-02 14:04:00)
by Calvin25
The extra $500 today will come back 10 fold if you decide to ever sell it
or go CS; I would do it.
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-02 07:39:00)
by DanH
Kelly,
Too close. Not enough photos/angles to offer a concrete suggestion, but you can do better.
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-01 12:46:00)
by Sam Buchanan
If this was my plane, I would not trim the pipes. Shorter pipes will add the complications you mentioned without any benefits.
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-03 15:02:00)
by jrs14855
There are hollow shafts for constant speed, solid shaft for aerobatic aircraft(not constant speed compatable), flanges with and without lightening holes. There are supposedly thicker flanges for aerobatics. Otherwise, leaving out the H models, as far as I can determine, any crank will fit any case. I am going the same route as you, I have a junk crank with lightening holes and a good crank ...
Started 2 weeks ago (2009-10-27 07:25:00)
by F1Boss
It might work (only sue to its location) -- but this type of intake does not generally produce any MP increase on piston engine intake systems due to 'ram effect'. You would be better off with a scoop sized to about 2x the fuel controller throat area, and try to include an expansion area that allows the air to slow a bit, but it would seem to me that this won't be possible in this particular ...
|
|