Conservative Fools | Forum profile

Whether it increases or decreases revenue is immaterial! Tax cuts let me keep more of my own money! Let the government do with less! It's not their money!!! I love this argument. It's so wonderfully simplistic. So's the couner-argument: If the government didn't spend money on stuff -- say roads for example -- you probably wouldn't have a job. If you don't mind saying, what's your line of work?

jtallenmd: I have been thinking about this for some time and I have come to the conclusion that liberal policies fail because when they develop their policies they fail to take into account that humans change their behavior based on the policies in effect. I think this is correct, although I guess I would generalize to say that it is because they interfere with liberty and self-determination that lead to the outcomes people really want,...

More on Jerry Brown (running for California Gvernor, again) and Acorn... http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/27/acorn-document-dump-tras... Kathy : -(

I brought this up on PA. One of the usual suspects actually suggested that the suicide angle is a cover-up, presumably by those right-wing wacko Kentucky law enforcement agencies. I kid you not. They'd better hope that those "right-wing wacko" Joint Chiefs of Staff, CIA operatives, and FBI officers hear them say such things, or they'll march in with their jack boots and haul them off to Gitmo.

tax and spend...tax and spend.... Now blackmail...if you want to 'win the war', vote for MORE TAXES... http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/663442c4-d896-11de-b63a-00144feabd... And who else but Barney Franks, the commie left wing chairman who has already screwed up Freddie, FAnnie, bank bailouts, porkulus , and every thing else he lays his hands on? How much more damage to the dems want to do to the economy? USEC-6 is at 17%. That is...

In a nutshell: http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gm09111020091109103...

Now, the New Zealanders are having data called into question: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017977/... What did we find? First, the station histories are unremarkable. There are no reasons for any large corrections. But we were astonished to find that strong adjustments have indeed been made. About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing...

Obama's latest polling numbers are just jaw-dropping in terms of his support among independents. If unemployment is still up and they force Obamacare through, it's going to be downright ugly for the dems next year. ________________ Though it is obvious that employment is a problem, that is NOT what is driving Obama's numbers. Unless you include the lying about employment, the blatantly partisan slush fund that is the Stimulus,...

"How many reporters were assigned to fact check Obama's or Clinton's books? I don't know, but the number of Palin's lies are several orders of magnitude higher than either of those two. She but has to open her mouth... " ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Have you read her book? Howie52

"Historical records consistently show that increases in tax rates lead to decreases in revenues while decreases in revenues lead to increases in tax rates." Only if you listen to sources that cherry pick their information. If you listen to intellectually honest sources, you will find it is a mixed bag depending upon all sorts of economic factors. Tax increases can lead to increased revenue, they call all so lead to decreased...