|
More site info...
Berkshire Hathaway | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for Berkshire Hathaway on http://www.fool.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Berkshire Hathaway, located on the Message Board at http://www.fool.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Berkshire Hathaway" on the Message Board at http://www.fool.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Berkshire Hathaway:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
66
|
356
|
690
|
|
Post:
|
258
|
1,193
|
2,221
|
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Fun with the intrinsivaluator
Published (2009-11-26 16:13:00)
This is why I like using the year 2000 and 2009, and using an implied assessment of intrinsic value by the master himself. That is, in 2000 Buffett clearly felt the IV was well above $1500/B. And I think it is fair to assume that if Buffett is issuing a fair number of shares in an acquistion at present, then at a minimum he does not believe they are seriously undervalued at today's prices (and this concords with recent public statements...
user's latest post:
Pounding the Table for BRK
Published (2009-11-25 22:01:00)
(2) The BNSF transaction is misunderstood. It is NOT being bought at a large discount to its intrinsic value, but it IS a business with a huge moat being purchased with insurance business float whose cost approaches zero (if not positive) and debt financing of $8 billion secured on very favorable terms. Berkshire is putting to work about two years cash flow with this purchase. Was that meant for me? :) et
user's latest post:
OT: Dividend portfolio recap
Published (2009-11-21 08:54:00)
The balance sheet is a typical Japanese fortress. Cash and short term investments exceed total liabilities, Mungofitch Even though the Japanese economy seems to be slipping, I'm sure there are many Japanese companies which are financially prepared to weather the current financial storms. People frequently compare the US and Japan and fear that we will go their way too. This article from 08 blames their economic slippage on a lack of...
user's latest post:
On the Distiribution of Earnings
Published (2009-11-24 12:14:00)
For all practical purposes, Berkshire's earnings (at least during Buffett's life) are not free to be distributed. Well, duh. Buffett has been pretty clear about his investment strategy. Essentially, he purchases (at prices which include a margin of safety) businesses with wide moats which generate cash. He then accumulates this cash until he is able to find ohter businesses to acquire at prices which include a margin of safety....
user's latest post:
Increase in Intrinsic Value
Published (2009-11-26 22:00:00)
gdefelice: I too have gone through all sorts of ways of trying to calculate the intrinsic value of Berkshire using all sorts of various metrics. And while I do believe those approaches can have merit, I believe the issue might be much simpler if we strip it down to the basics. Is it reasonable to agree with Buffett that the shares were grossly undervalued in early 2000? Is it reasonable to assume that the shares are not MORE undervalued now?...
user's latest post:
The Millionth Article
Published (2009-11-23 11:31:00)
The article doesn't answer the question the headline poses. But, non-the-less, a reasonable thesis as to why Buffett might be disinclined to hand over a Berkshire too weighed down with financial and insurance services. kelbon Alice Schroeder On Buffett And BNI; Which Company Will Berkshire Hathaway Acquire Next? http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=76366 snip: know this is probably the millionth article written about Buffett's...
user's latest post:
On the Distiribution of Earnings
Published (2009-11-26 07:59:00)
Ican only conclude that he will never buy back shares and that his explanations of his reasons for this refusal are disingenuous. If I understand value reasoning correctly, presumably if BRK is a great buy for Buffett, it is an even better buy for everybody who is not Buffett? So even though these posts seem to be complaining about how Buffett runs Berkshire capital allocation, they are actually at least as Bullish as any of the more...
user's latest post:
OT: Costco drops Coke
Published (2009-11-19 11:34:00)
Euro, Very good question about the bottlers making deals with retailers. Are bottlers regional? If so, it is hard to imagine regional bottlers negotiating deals with the Costco/s headquarters in their region and then maybe having different prices from one area of the country to the next. FWIW: I am just surmising. Maybe someone else has more knowledge in how Coca-Cola negotiates with buyers like Costco & Walmart who come to the table...
user's latest post:
WEB Train Killer
Published (2009-11-25 02:41:00)
This is my opinion, but CNBC, despite the fact that my grandfather watches it religiously for it's investing advice, is not more than a forum for the fringes. It makes investing and money more emotional and dangerous. No different than Fox news and MSNBC on either side of the political spectrum. All of them should be aired with warnings like infomercials. !!!!!!!!!!! hear hear, or they could just have a little music with the...
user's latest post:
Bill & Warren at CU
Published (2009-11-18 19:19:00)
>Microsoft retains its dominant position because of its relatively proprietary file formats that everyone is using make it so difficult for any individual or business to leave the established standard. I don't know if this is true...but suppose it is. As a shareholder (and I'm a shareholder posting on a stock site), is this supposed to be a bad thing? Is making the file format readable for the world the best thing for...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Berkshire Hathaway::
Started 11 hours, 12 minutes ago (2009-11-27 15:31:00)
by mungofitch
Should we be borrowing from other sources? God, no. I'm an utter idiot to be borrowing. Don't do what I'd do. Jim PS If you like writing puts, it need not be dangerous. An old post of mine, nice book recommendation in there http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=23703259
Started 13 hours, 58 minutes ago (2009-11-27 12:45:00)
by eurotrash01
Guys, the beauty of brk is that even if he makes a mistake ,even if its a big one,there is still an extremely good chance that he will compound at between 10-15%. This is a load of crap. Sorry, VINNY. Can you please find me the Buffett quote where it says the return you get is independent of the price you pay. et
Started 2 days, 7 hours ago (2009-11-25 18:59:00)
by StevnFool
Jim, Did you find that a multiple of the "liquidation" setting gave a better alignment with price than say a multiple of the conservative IV? On a related note, I generated a log chart of the conservative IV from end 1981 through Q3 2009. I applied a linear trendline to the log chart. I'm not looking at the chart right now, but I believe the current value of the trendline suggests a trend ...
Started 1 day, 16 hours ago (2009-11-26 10:01:00)
by commoncents33
Just to clarify my previous post: *Unless* the current price is below intrinsic value to a greater degree than $1500 was in early 2000, then the rate of growth for the past decade simply could not be better than 8.5% And if someone wants to argue that the current price is indeed a steeper discount to the one and only time Buffett offered a buyback, then I would love to hear how it could be ...
Started 1 day, 16 hours ago (2009-11-26 10:04:00)
by commoncents33
For all those who picked "greater or equal to 8.5%", I would love to hear your rationale for this. Thanks.
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Berkshire Hathaway::
Started 3 days, 17 hours ago (2009-11-24 08:48:00)
by EsamMoney
I don't disagree that we probably won't see buybacks or dividends from Berkshire during Buffett's lifetime, but I can disagree with the following statement, at least on a relative basis: "If this isn't the explanation, then I believe Buffett simply has not been an admirable allocator of Berkshire's capital for the past decade, and for anyone too blind-with-Buffett to see this, simply ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 15:00:00)
by jwk13
"This surprised him a little, he said, as Geico wasn't one the cheapest auto insurance companies." I would love to see where you got this from. jk
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-17 16:21:00)
by namkato
I shop at Alberson's usually, and I buy soda if it is on sale, like 2 liters for 99 cents. My son loves Coke far and above all others. It used to come on sale a lot, so we almost always had it in the house. However, for the past year or so, it is never on sale anymore. Diet 7-Up is often 99 cents. Diet Coke always $1.79. This is a big break from the past, and shows how strong Coke's ...
Started 4 days, 14 hours ago (2009-11-23 12:20:00)
by eurotrash01
USG: "Where patient capital goes to die." Deep deep cyclical with deep deep cyclical pain/euphoria associated with it. This dominant firm manages to go bankrupt every 13 years when the cycle crashes down. The market prices the stock accordingly. Good managers can only do so much. et
Started 2 days, 7 hours ago (2009-11-25 18:59:00)
by StevnFool
Jim, Did you find that a multiple of the "liquidation" setting gave a better alignment with price than say a multiple of the conservative IV? On a related note, I generated a log chart of the conservative IV from end 1981 through Q3 2009. I applied a linear trendline to the log chart. I'm not looking at the chart right now, but I believe the current value of the trendline suggests a trend ...
Started 1 week, 4 days ago (2009-11-17 00:17:00)
by namkato
(1) If the purchase of BNI was knowingly not a "bargain", (2)...rather than using the very same $ to buy back the beautiful collection of 70+ businesses we already own ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++ (1) If I were a BNI shareholder considering which way to vote my shares on the takeover, I would be strongly influenced to vote against it if I were subject to the ...
Started 1 day, 16 hours ago (2009-11-26 10:01:00)
by commoncents33
Just to clarify my previous post: *Unless* the current price is below intrinsic value to a greater degree than $1500 was in early 2000, then the rate of growth for the past decade simply could not be better than 8.5% And if someone wants to argue that the current price is indeed a steeper discount to the one and only time Buffett offered a buyback, then I would love to hear how it could be ...
Started 13 hours, 58 minutes ago (2009-11-27 12:45:00)
by eurotrash01
Guys, the beauty of brk is that even if he makes a mistake ,even if its a big one,there is still an extremely good chance that he will compound at between 10-15%. This is a load of crap. Sorry, VINNY. Can you please find me the Buffett quote where it says the return you get is independent of the price you pay. et
Started 3 days, 7 hours ago (2009-11-24 18:52:00)
by JeanDavid
My initial reaction was negative for BNI, but after second thought felt the lead-in to this piece was neutral and not as CNBC intended. Still need to get goods from West Coast to western and central states. Doubt if Asian producers would ship to Baltimore via ship and then via ground to St. Louis, Denver, etc. They could do some of that through the St. Lawrence seaway. And they could widen ...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-18 16:51:00)
by mungofitch
The BNI deal yields a pre tax free cash flow yield of approx 5%, that plus growth of say 8% over time, gives a total yield of 13%. That is much better than a taxable bond of 5%... If the pretax cash flow yield started at 5% and increased by 8%/year for a decade, the ending cash flow yield would be 10.8%/yr on the original money. If the pretax cash flow yield started at 5% and ...
|
|