US Scene Forum | Forum profile

Quote: Originally Posted by Darkstar Surely being boring is subjective, but making a mistake with the execution of a move is a point of fact? I'm going more along the Botchtista name, implying that he botches all the time, while ignoring that Randy has plenty of botches to his name, most famous being the time he failed to RKO Chris Jericho, a botch far, far more blatant that Dave not sitting down right with the Batista Bomb, a mistake so...

Batista has predominantly been booked as the super face (up to now) while Orton's been the cocky or crazy heel, so yeah in terms of who's the bigger name, then Batista but just because that's how he's booked really. Orton, IMO, is better in every way than Batista.

So far there is one vote for UltraMantis, one undecided vote between UltraMantis and Morishima, and one vote for El Ligero. I still need more votes. __________________ ShaolinHandLock: The #1 Kung Fu Movie Expert on TWO! Screw you The Maxx, I want my Starcastle Trophy back!

Yeah, it is a problem that. Obviously if you wanted to book him as Umaga with months of undefeatedness and stuff, its way too soon to be killing that. But I mean, we dont even know if they would have, its only been 3 weeks! Although Umaga was still kept pretty strong after losing to Cena. Obviously he lost the undefeated aura, but he was still this huge monster who was really, really hard to beat. So its not a death knell to lose to Cena,...

Quote: Originally Posted by Jung It's nowhere near that, if anything their fairly equal in that they've both gone from doing nothing to main eventing from nowhere. But can't see where you're getting 10 times bad as from. what? so Daniels who has actually main evented PPV's in the past against some one who hasn't. Daniels connection to AJ means its Logical whereas Sheamus has no nothing to even justifly it at all....

Quote: Originally Posted by Tommate2k9 But there wasn't.. Thats why i said it. Does it really matter? My opinion is that neither is a bigger star than the other, why you are making something of it?

Quote: Originally Posted by The Beltster WWE would not struggle to fill a channel around the clock with programming. They would really only need to run 24 hours of original programming a week and fill out the rest of the time with repeated stuff. They have complete WWWF, WWF, WWE, WCW, ECW, JCP, WCCW, UWF and many more libraries consisting of tens of thousands of hours of footage. The WWE On Demand channel here runs original programming...

Quote: Originally Posted by Jung I think we have to approach it on a grand scale. There is more crap now which is why less people watch. I don't think that's true at all. It's all just mediocre now, there's very rarely anything truly good or bad at the moment. Quote: Originally Posted by Jung And I don't think it's all to do with what kids like. I mean the attitude era was drawing regular 5 and 6 ratings and we...

If you're Michael Cole everything you're told is funny is funny. __________________ Video Games Forum Leader: Video Games Forum Wrestling 101: Wrestling 101 Video Games http://www.smartwrestlingfan.com/

Fair enough.