|
More site info...
Forbidden/Limited List Discussion | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for Forbidden/Limited List Discussion on http://www.tcgplayer.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Forbidden/Limited List Discussion, located on the Message Board at http://www.tcgplayer.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Forbidden/Limited List Discussion" on the Message Board at http://www.tcgplayer.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Forbidden/Limited List Discussion:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
9
|
54
|
266
|
|
Post:
|
42
|
326
|
1,785
|
|
|
Forbidden/Limited List Discussion Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Does anybody wish/think Heavy...
Published (2008-11-28 10:06:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by zanbatou00 id like to see heavy at 1 mst at 1 trunade at 2 that makes much more sense. trunade provides a one turn solution. and just like heavy and stuff, cards can still be chained to it. and it makes you play smarter knowing that the threats u removed will be back later in the game. Maybe if heavy was banned trunade could go to 2...
user's latest post:
Wow. - Page 3 - TCGplayer.com...
Published (2008-11-25 16:39:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by boneclub24 i think limiting tele is not such a good idea because it would hurt dedicated pyschic decks a lot.jd going to 1 is a bad idea because lightsworn hasn't made top eight yet and always mill there copys anyway.if heavy goes to 1,at least put trunade to two aswell for otks and beastdown and empty jar and stuff (lots of random decks at my locals) You must have been in a coma for the last week. Lightsworn...
user's latest post:
The Cards are Getting Better,...
Published (2008-11-25 02:29:00)
"Seriously, banning like the....10 good cards that came out of those old packs, is a slap to the face for the people who actualy bought the boosters then. Also speaking of booster packs, I sometimes question how many people who do the offical tournys actually buy boosters, or straight from ebay or something of the sort for their cards. I find banning some of these older cards a bit of a cripple ontop of that. Like say I finally get...
user's latest post:
Does anybody wish/think Heavy...
Published (2008-11-25 19:46:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by SGTslappy Heavy storm is limited to one so who gives? i wish yaichi was banned. i lost 6 out of 8 games today because of him letting the grandmaster out and destroy my mirror and etc and then killed me with the shogun and etc. Yaichi is very broken in 6 samurai decks. If this is a local full of six samurai you should side threatening roar and lightning vortex.... ( and lots, because samurai do sack )
user's latest post:
Limited + Forbidden question..
Published (2008-11-26 01:11:00)
Frist of all, a card that's limited(whatever format) means you can only use one in your entire deck. If it's semi limited, you only use two.That means you cannot play 2 Pot Of Greeds, 3 Monster Reborns or 3 Nobleman Of Crossouts. As for advanced/traditional format, well it all depends on what your friends/cousin decide to play. If they decide to play advanced format, then there'll be banned cards. Hope this helps... EDIT: Umm...
user's latest post:
Does anybody wish/think Heavy...
Published (2008-11-25 20:07:00)
It used to happen to me as well, but in terms of stacking, it does not give reason for a card to be banned. That's like saying I ALWAYS top deck Lightning Vortex, so therefore, it should be banned as well. Now don't get me wrong, I don't know how many times you have been hit with a first turn Heavy Storm, so I can't relate on that. I'm just stating an opinion towards the topic at hand that it does not deserve banning yet.
user's latest post:
Should Dark Armed Dragon be...
Published (2008-11-25 12:10:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by masterwoo0 DAD is not the problem. Massive hand advantage is. Its obvious when you're having a Mirror Match and it doesn't become a stalemate, that someone drew a better hand, otherwise, neither player could beat each other. This IS the problem, not DAD. Yes, DAD can kill your chances of surviving a synchro swarm, but in order to do those things, they have to have really good hands. Well, guess what...
user's latest post:
idea about unbanning cards -...
Published (2008-11-25 08:11:00)
most of the cards that got limited power are still amazing. i dont care if i lose 200 points as well if i lock them with yata. i dont mind losing life when i use pot of greed. cyber jar clears field, who cares if its removed after. fiber jar virtually restarts the game, using it 1 time is enough.
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Forbidden/Limited List Discussion::
Started 2 months, 2 weeks ago (2008-09-14 20:24:00)
by Kane-333
I wish heavy storm was banned so bad...most of the time Im too terrified of setting more than one spell/trap on the field. Also, I hate it when people have heavy storm on the first turn.
Started 1 week ago (2008-11-26 01:02:00)
by sPaZzTiXx
NOTE: I Know this already jsut my cousin just belives that these cards are only limited and forbidden for tournaments and not for regular duels.. So please explain are they the same or different
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-24 15:22:00)
by Klasel
I. Forbidden Cards You cannot use these cards in your Deck, Extra Deck or Side Deck. BLACK LUSTER SOLDIER - ENVOY OF THE BEGINNING BUTTERFLY DAGGER - ELMA CALL OF THE HAUNTED CHANGE OF HEART CHAOS EMPEROR DRAGON - ENVOY OF THE END CHAOS SORCERER CONFISCATION CYBER JAR CYBER-STEIN DARK HOLE DARK MAGICIAN OF CHAOS DELINQUENT DUO DESTINY HERO - DISK COMMANDER ...
Started 2 months ago (2008-09-28 12:16:00)
by Chaos_Pudding
Note that the topic in question is asking what you feel SHOULD be done, NOT what you think will be done. I trust that you all know the difference. That being said, I am looking forward to all of your well thought out and well reasoned arguments for or against.
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2008-10-12 18:26:00)
by withbrokenwings6
if old cards that have been banned were brought back, it would obiously be very overpowering and the amount on non-creative and ftk/otk decks would rise alot. i thought of another idea, remake all of thease cards but with a 2 on the end ex: pot of greed = pot of greed 2 heres a list of text updates i have made. BLACK LUSTER SOLDIER - ENVOY OF THE BEGINNING - Remove 2 Light ...
Started 2 months, 2 weeks ago (2008-09-16 04:39:00)
by Marzbar
You probably already know this, it's not hard to see. Every set we get, the cards become more and more powerful. It's been pretty subtle actually, but if you compare cards from The Duelist Genesis, Light of Destruction and Phantom Darkness to say... Enemy of Justice and Shadow of Infinity, the difference is AMAZING. Seriously. Now this isn't a bad thing. But it does raise an interesting issue...
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-09-21 17:11:00)
by nndragon
I can't believe they banned those it is good that they brought monster reborn back but i does not make up for the losses. I guess when the cards get abused to much then they will ban them forcing duelist to use another strategy
Started 3 weeks, 5 days ago (2008-11-07 09:29:00)
by zanbatou00
with everyone whinning about telport needing to be banned malicious needing to be banned dad needing to be banned krebons /restricted i decided to test it out. i took the most recent sjc winning deck and i tested it agaisnt its exact self. then i took teleport down to 1 and tested it then i put the teleports back in and took malicious to 2 and tested then i took ...
Started 4 weeks ago (2008-11-05 12:42:00)
by KojinSagara
I've had months to think about these things, watching websites, seeing winners of events, and going to these events myself. i usually dont even like to bother posting about this, but with a lot of time to think about it, i can give you guys a clear, unbiased explanation of my feelings. i hope you understand that im not trying to bash a decktype because it's broken, although I feel that the ...
Started 1 month ago (2008-11-02 19:50:00)
by yo shorty b
Have you ever wondered what would happen if we would ban ALL draw cards? The game would be way more skill based, without turns like when you activate 2 Allures and 1 Ddraw. If you were to ban all the draw cards like, destiny draw, allure of darkness, and even things like trade in. the the game would be so much more balanced, and players would have to actually have to make semi consistant decks, ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Forbidden/Limited List Discussion::
Started 2 months, 2 weeks ago (2008-09-14 20:24:00)
by Kane-333
I wish heavy storm was banned so bad...most of the time Im too terrified of setting more than one spell/trap on the field. Also, I hate it when people have heavy storm on the first turn.
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-24 15:22:00)
by Klasel
I. Forbidden Cards You cannot use these cards in your Deck, Extra Deck or Side Deck. BLACK LUSTER SOLDIER - ENVOY OF THE BEGINNING BUTTERFLY DAGGER - ELMA CALL OF THE HAUNTED CHANGE OF HEART CHAOS EMPEROR DRAGON - ENVOY OF THE END CHAOS SORCERER CONFISCATION CYBER JAR CYBER-STEIN DARK HOLE DARK MAGICIAN OF CHAOS DELINQUENT DUO DESTINY HERO - DISK COMMANDER ...
Started 1 week ago (2008-11-26 01:02:00)
by sPaZzTiXx
NOTE: I Know this already jsut my cousin just belives that these cards are only limited and forbidden for tournaments and not for regular duels.. So please explain are they the same or different
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2008-10-12 18:26:00)
by withbrokenwings6
if old cards that have been banned were brought back, it would obiously be very overpowering and the amount on non-creative and ftk/otk decks would rise alot. i thought of another idea, remake all of thease cards but with a 2 on the end ex: pot of greed = pot of greed 2 heres a list of text updates i have made. BLACK LUSTER SOLDIER - ENVOY OF THE BEGINNING - Remove 2 Light ...
Started 2 months ago (2008-09-28 12:16:00)
by Chaos_Pudding
Note that the topic in question is asking what you feel SHOULD be done, NOT what you think will be done. I trust that you all know the difference. That being said, I am looking forward to all of your well thought out and well reasoned arguments for or against.
Started 2 months, 2 weeks ago (2008-09-16 04:39:00)
by Marzbar
You probably already know this, it's not hard to see. Every set we get, the cards become more and more powerful. It's been pretty subtle actually, but if you compare cards from The Duelist Genesis, Light of Destruction and Phantom Darkness to say... Enemy of Justice and Shadow of Infinity, the difference is AMAZING. Seriously. Now this isn't a bad thing. But it does raise an interesting issue...
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-09-21 17:11:00)
by nndragon
I can't believe they banned those it is good that they brought monster reborn back but i does not make up for the losses. I guess when the cards get abused to much then they will ban them forcing duelist to use another strategy
|
|