|
More site info...
Brightmail Gateway | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for Brightmail Gateway on http://www.symantec.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Brightmail Gateway, located on the Message Board at http://www.symantec.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Brightmail Gateway" on the Message Board at http://www.symantec.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Brightmail Gateway:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
27
|
108
|
342
|
|
Post:
|
44
|
186
|
549
|
|
|
Brightmail Gateway Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Anbody know how to download the...
Published (2009-12-03 19:36:14)
If you click this link, you can choose if you want to evaluate a hardware appliance or the virtual edition. http://www.symantec.com/business/products/trialwar... If you do the virtual edition you'll be able to log in with you same crednetials as you log into the forums with and there may or may not be some questions on your company size and such and then you'll be emailed a 30-day license and given access to the ISO file for 8.0.3...
user's latest post:
TLS Encryption
Published (2009-12-03 08:48:39)
Hi, First of all I'd suggest you use Symantec Brightmail Gateway (SBG) instead of SMS SMTP 5. There's a difference between the key length of the certificate used to negotiate the TLS connection and the cipher used to encrypt the traffic. You are most probably referring to the cipher and in that case 168 bit key is one of the available options on SBG 8. Have a look at the SBG documentation for more details on TLS:...
user's latest post:
Brightmail not at the gateway...
Published (2009-12-03 11:22:33)
The customer has Symantec internally for AV and the Suite price was very little price difference and gave them SBG. On the Ironport side, they would have had to purchase extra licenses for AS and AV scanning, which was cost prohibitive. The Ironport was desired for their email encryption, TLS and DLP functionality though.
user's latest post:
Brightmail not at the gateway...
Published (2009-12-01 06:50:37)
Hi, There is a Best Practice KB her e which outlines some things such as Global Bad Senders and connection classification. You can also read about effectiveness with global reputation in this article I wrote earlier this year Also, the installation guide has a section on deployment: "For Symantec Brightmail Gateway's spam, content compliance filters, and IP-based sender groups to function properly, you should avoid...
user's latest post:
Brightmail: Gatekeeper module...
Published (2009-11-26 07:58:55)
Hi Federico, Yes, I think there is: Here's how they appear: 2009-11-25T16:43:16+08:00 (ERROR:3802.2714119088): [57092] Gatekeeper module: Failure typing text with Verity. 2009-11-25T16:43:15+08:00 (ERROR:3802.2714119088): [57007] Gatekeeper module: Failure evaluating dictionary rules. 2009-11-25T16:43:15+08:00 (ERROR:3802.2714119088): [57008] Gatekeeper module: Failed to extract text for attachment dictionary scanning....
user's latest post:
Aliases can't delivery to...
Published (2009-12-01 20:36:26)
Your solution is not work... And the Document's solution is not solution, it just tell me not to use it. Will symantec fix it?
user's latest post:
Solved
Published (2009-11-27 00:00:00)
Could it be that this problem came back in the recent release (8.0.3-11)? I see a lot of messages sitting in the delivery queue with 4xx SMTP error codes.
user's latest post:
Missing inbound emails
Published (2009-11-27 00:00:00)
Hi Brentwood, What version of SBG are you running? So we are talking about mail coming from the internet into comp.com correct? And is all this mail not coming in? Are you sure the mx records for comp.com are pointing to the Brightmail Gateway? And is comp.com set up as a local domain on the SBG? If you just telnet to port 25 on the Inbound Mail IP and send a test message in what do you see in...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Brightmail Gateway::
Started 8 hours, 56 minutes ago (2009-12-07 06:32:44)
by fferaboli
Hi,
I guess is the content of that file what matters, not the extension. Is there any way you can validate the content of that file to check if is UTF-8 compliant?
You can maybe open that file with a text editor like TextPad and use the option "Save As" selecting UTF-8 as desired enconding and then try again.
If that doesn't work and if attaching that file to this thread is not ...
Started 19 hours, 54 minutes ago (2009-12-06 19:34:19)
by dnslammers
Yes.
We have multiple domains that we use thru our appliance.
Stephen
Started 6 days, 15 hours ago (2009-11-30 23:44:41)
by manyeung
NO....
My masquerading list is empty....
And i check the guide, it never said alias's destination address can't be as same as source address, example, source: "a@company.com" and destination: "a@company.com", "b@hotmail.com".
Started 19 hours, 55 minutes ago (2009-12-06 19:33:25)
by dnslammers
No. Nothing built in.
You can setup multiple scanners and use round robin dns but thats about it.
Stephen
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-27 00:00:00)
by KevK76
Hi Brentwood,
What version of SBG are you running? So we are talking about mail coming from the internet into comp.com correct? And is all this mail not coming in? Are you sure the mx records for comp.com are pointing to the Brightmail Gateway? And is comp.com set up as a local domain on the SBG? If you just telnet to port 25 on the Inbound Mail IP and send a test message in what do...
Started 3 days, 19 hours ago (2009-12-03 19:36:14)
by TSE-JDavis
If you click this link, you can choose if you want to evaluate a hardware appliance or the virtual edition.
http://www.symantec.com/business/products/trialwar ...
If you do the virtual edition you'll be able to log in with you same crednetials as you log into the forums with and there may or may not be some questions on your company size and such and then you'll be emailed a 30-day ...
Started 3 days, 19 hours ago (2009-12-03 19:33:19)
by TSE-JDavis
You can verify these settings under Admin -> Configuration -> Host -> DNS/Time tab.
Make sure the settings are correct and maybe try setting the time manually and then go back to NTP server.
Title: 'Message tracking shows messages with the wrong time or date stamp'
Document ID: 2006120717003363
> Web URL: http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/ ...
Started 3 days, 20 hours ago (2009-12-03 19:25:26)
by TSE-JDavis
No, becuase it will not let you use authentication from more than one server.
When you remove a server, it removes the option of using the settings, so this is expected behaviour.
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-30 13:39:36)
by TSE-JDavis
Correct, obviously we will be seeing the first hop's IP address all the time so that will not be useful but we will still be doing checks on the messages themselves and mathcing them up with known spam messages and doing a heursitic scan for suspected spam.
Honestly it should work fine. What device will be in front of it, by the way?
Started 4 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-03 08:48:39)
by fferaboli
Hi,
First of all I'd suggest you use Symantec Brightmail Gateway ( SBG) instead of SMS SMTP 5.
There's a difference between the key length of the certificate used to negotiate the TLS connection and the cipher used to encrypt the traffic. You are most probably referring to the cipher and in that case 168 bit key is one of the available options on SBG 8.
Have a look at the SBG ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Brightmail Gateway::
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-30 13:39:36)
by TSE-JDavis
Correct, obviously we will be seeing the first hop's IP address all the time so that will not be useful but we will still be doing checks on the messages themselves and mathcing them up with known spam messages and doing a heursitic scan for suspected spam.
Honestly it should work fine. What device will be in front of it, by the way?
Started 6 days, 15 hours ago (2009-11-30 23:44:41)
by manyeung
NO....
My masquerading list is empty....
And i check the guide, it never said alias's destination address can't be as same as source address, example, source: "a@company.com" and destination: "a@company.com", "b@hotmail.com".
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-27 00:00:00)
by elikazum
Hi Federico
I am referring to the Symantec Mail Security . You can see it in the mail provided.
When I say "user", I mean the recipient of this mail. The SMS quarantines the spam message and somehow few users are getting this mail with the two attachments provided.
This message comes from : From: Mail Delivery System [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@big.boi.gov.il] , ehich is the SMS product ...
Started 19 hours, 54 minutes ago (2009-12-06 19:34:19)
by dnslammers
Yes.
We have multiple domains that we use thru our appliance.
Stephen
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-30 14:53:52)
by TSE-JDavis
You would need to set up a different sync entry for each domain. So you would put in the domain for the screen you are on, then save it and choose 'Add' again and put in the information for that domain.
Started 4 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-03 08:48:39)
by fferaboli
Hi,
First of all I'd suggest you use Symantec Brightmail Gateway (SBG) instead of SMS SMTP 5.
There's a difference between the key length of the certificate used to negotiate the TLS connection and the cipher used to encrypt the traffic. You are most probably referring to the cipher and in that case 168 bit key is one of the available options on SBG 8.
Have a look at the SBG ...
Started 3 days, 19 hours ago (2009-12-03 19:36:14)
by TSE-JDavis
If you click this link, you can choose if you want to evaluate a hardware appliance or the virtual edition.
http://www.symantec.com/business/products/trialwar ...
If you do the virtual edition you'll be able to log in with you same crednetials as you log into the forums with and there may or may not be some questions on your company size and such and then you'll be emailed a 30-day ...
Started 3 days, 19 hours ago (2009-12-03 19:33:19)
by TSE-JDavis
You can verify these settings under Admin -> Configuration -> Host -> DNS/Time tab.
Make sure the settings are correct and maybe try setting the time manually and then go back to NTP server.
Title: 'Message tracking shows messages with the wrong time or date stamp'
Document ID: 2006120717003363
> Web URL: http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/ ...
Started 3 days, 20 hours ago (2009-12-03 19:25:26)
by TSE-JDavis
No, becuase it will not let you use authentication from more than one server.
When you remove a server, it removes the option of using the settings, so this is expected behaviour.
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-27 00:00:00)
by KevK76
Hi Brentwood,
What version of SBG are you running? So we are talking about mail coming from the internet into comp.com correct? And is all this mail not coming in? Are you sure the mx records for comp.com are pointing to the Brightmail Gateway? And is comp.com set up as a local domain on the SBG? If you just telnet to port 25 on the Inbound Mail IP and send a test message in what do...
|
|
Size: 566 bytes
