Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Replication (2005) | Forum profile
Forum profile page for Replication (2005) on http://www.sqlteam.com. This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Replication (2005), located on the Message Board at http://www.sqlteam.com. This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period. Additional forum profile information for "Replication (2005)" on the Message Board at http://www.sqlteam.com is also shown in the following ways:

1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week

Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
Site: SQL Server Forums - Replication (2005)
SQL Server Forums
(site profile, domain info sqlteam.com)
Title: Replication (2005)
Url: http://www.sqlteam.com/forums/forum.asp?FORUM_I...
Users activity: 16 post per thread
Forum activity: 1 active thread during last week
 

Posting activity on Replication (2005):

  Week Month 3 Months
Threads: 1 19 34
Post: 4 32 56
 

Replication (2005) Posting activity graph:

Posts by:  day  week  month 

Top authors during last week:

Name
Posts
russell
2
user's latest post:
Replication and Computed columns
Published (2009-12-10 11:57:00)
> Well, the formula is part of the table definition: Create Table aTable ( a int, b int, c as (a + b) ) So changes to a and b are replicated and the computation occurs on the subscriber for c as well as on the publisher.
Pim75
2
user's latest post:
Replication and Computed columns
Published (2009-12-10 09:54:00)
> Thanks for your reply. So as I understand only the formula is replicated, not the data? I wondered about this, because the colums is Persisted (data is saved on the server).
 

Latest active threads on Replication (2005)::

SQL Server Forums
Started 2 weeks, 5 days ago (2009-11-27 13:10:00)  by krishnarajeesh
> Make sure the log reader agent is up. Also try to run the snapshot again. Is the error popping in the initial setup itself ? If yes re-snapshot should solve the issue. Pls let us know the SQL Server versions as well. Thanks, Krishna Rajeesh www.SQLServer.in Blogs.SQLServer.in
Thread:  Show this thread (3 posts)   Thread info: Replication throws strange error Size: 574 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Replication throws strange error :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
SQL Server Forums
Started 6 days, 10 hours ago (2009-12-10 09:35:00)  by russell
> neither. you don't insert into computed columns. the table definition should be the same on the subscriber as on the publisher.
Thread:  Show this thread (4 posts)   Thread info: Replication and Computed columns Size: 326 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Replication and Computed columns :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
SQL Server Forums
Started 2 weeks, 4 days ago (2009-11-28 04:22:00)  by russell
> what is the current status of the snapshot agent?
Thread:  Show this thread (2 posts)   Thread info: Distributer is failing Size: 248 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Distributer is failing :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
SQL Server Forums
Started 2 weeks, 5 days ago (2009-11-27 01:11:00)  by tkizer
> Why is this urgent? Production doesn't seem to be down. Late on your homework? Tara Kizer Microsoft MVP for Windows Server System - SQL Server http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ Subscribe to my blog "Let's begin with the premise that everything you've done up until this point is wrong."
Thread:  Show this thread (3 posts)   Thread info: urgent help in this senario Size: 791 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: urgent help in this senario :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
SQL Server Forums
Started 3 weeks ago (2009-11-25 13:54:00)  by dinakar
> Yes. it should work in either direction. Just make sure the distributor is at least same version as publisher. Dinakar Nethi ************************ Life is short. Enjoy it. ************************ http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/dinakar/
Thread:  Show this thread (4 posts)   Thread info: Replication between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server Size: 539 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Replication between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
SQL Server Forums
Started 3 weeks, 2 days ago (2009-11-23 09:49:00)  by krishnarajeesh
> Hello, Setup a simple replication in your local system may be. Start with GUI. Once setup generate sql scripts for the created replication & go through them. This will give you an understanding on whats happening through coding. A good place to start is http://www.devarticles.com/c/a/SQL-Server/Replicat ion-SQL-Server-2000--Part-1/ Thanks, Krishna www....
Thread:  Show this thread (3 posts)   Thread info: New for replication environment Size: 796 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: New for replication environment :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
SQL Server Forums
Started 3 weeks ago (2009-11-25 14:19:00)  by tkizer
> You could use bcp.exe to move the data around. Tara Kizer Microsoft MVP for Windows Server System - SQL Server http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/ Subscribe to my blog "Let's begin with the premise that everything you've done up until this point is wrong."
Thread:  Show this thread (2 posts)   Thread info: Replication between unconnected databases Size: 757 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Replication between unconnected databases :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
SQL Server Forums
Started 4 weeks ago (2009-11-18 10:48:00)  by RickD
> quote: - i know than in a replication, its recommanded than dailly to perform a snapshot replication also, for that the integrity and consistency of data This is definitely not recommended in the real world. The only time you should be snapshotting is if there are structure changes or you have serious problems with replication. Other than that, what is your ...
Thread:  Show this thread (6 posts)   Thread info: suggestion for replication in SQL 2005 Size: 1,169 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: suggestion for replication in SQL 2005 :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
 

Hot threads for last week on Replication (2005)::

Replication (2005)
Started 6 days, 10 hours ago (2009-12-10 09:35:00)  by russell
> neither. you don't insert into computed columns. the table definition should be the same on the subscriber as on the publisher.
Thread:  Show this thread (4 posts)   Thread info: Replication and Computed columns Size: 326 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Replication and Computed columns :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"
Replication (2005)
Started 2 weeks, 5 days ago (2009-11-27 13:10:00)  by krishnarajeesh
> Make sure the log reader agent is up. Also try to run the snapshot again. Is the error popping in the initial setup itself ? If yes re-snapshot should solve the issue. Pls let us know the SQL Server versions as well. Thanks, Krishna Rajeesh www.SQLServer.in Blogs.SQLServer.in
Thread:  Show this thread (3 posts)   Thread info: Replication throws strange error Size: 574 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Replication throws strange error :: Replication (2005) :: SQL Server Forums"