sci.physics.research | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for sci.physics.research on http://www.physicsforums.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: sci.physics.research, located on the Message Board at http://www.physicsforums.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "sci.physics.research" on the Message Board at http://www.physicsforums.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on sci.physics.research:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
10
|
102
|
352
|
|
Post:
|
20
|
146
|
464
|
|
|
sci.physics.research Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Which theorem proves that every...
Published (2008-11-22 06:20:46)
In article <slrnfo72ts.tmo.bergv@u19.math.uiuc.edu>, Maarten Bergvelt <bergv@math.uiuc.edu> wrote: > > Lou, > > > > I realize that the underlying math of a chaotic system could be > > deterministic but the point of the theorem, if I remember correctly, > > is that it assumed chaotic behavior and concluded the existence of a > >...
user's latest post:
Would Einstein recognize his own...
Published (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
DisplayAds("Right1"); Hi, I commented that "if Einstein came back to Earth he would not recognize his theory and he would be told to study MTW if he wanted to learn General Relativity." As a response I was told that I did not know GR so I should not posit such thing. I thought that was fair. So what do experts here think? The assumption is that Einstein comes in disguise, not as a celebrity, in that case, no one...
user's latest post:
Does Quantum Theory Predict...
Published (2008-11-22 05:44:01)
Shubee wrote: > > Researchers at the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and > Applied Science have succeeded in creating and capturing optical rogue > waves and have measured their statistical properties. They found that > these rogue waves obey "L-shaped" statistics. > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1212201239.htm > > Can this observation be accounted for...
Jonathan Thornburg [remove...
2
user's latest post:
Would Einstein recognize his own...
Published (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
azeynel1@gmail.com wrote: > I commented that "if Einstein came back to Earth he would not > recognize his theory and he would be told to study MTW if he wanted to > learn General Relativity." As a response I was told that I did not > know GR so I should not posit such thing. I thought that was fair. So > what do experts here think? The assumption is that Einstein comes in > disguise,...
user's latest post:
Would Einstein recognize his own...
Published (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
azeyn...@gmail.com wrote: > I commented that "if Einstein came back to Earth he would not > recognize his theory and he would be told to study MTW if he wanted to > learn General Relativity." > The assumption is that Einstein comes in disguise, not as a celebrity, > in that case, no one would care to tell him to study GR. You have to understand something that is almost completely unknown...
user's latest post:
Re: Would Einstein recognize his...
Published (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
DisplayAds("Right1"); On Nov 18, 4:06 am, Gerry Quinn <ger...@indigo.ie> wrote: > In article <ge17e7$l3...@fb07-hees.theo.physik.uni-giessen.de>, > jth...@astro.indiana-zebra.edu says... > > But there are of course many many many new developments which Einstein > > didn't know in 1915, or even in 1955 when he died. For example, the > > concept...
user's latest post:
Would Einstein recognize his own...
Published (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
In article <ge17e7$l36$1@fb07-hees.theo.physik.uni-giessen.de>, jthorn@astro.indiana-zebra.edu says... > The basic concepts of differential geometry & coordinate invariance, > special relativity, the equivalence principle, and the Einstein field > equations, are all essentially as Einstein described them. This > suggests that yes, the "reincarnated Einstein" would indeed...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on sci.physics.research::
Started 1 day, 8 hours ago (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
by Igor Khavkine
DisplayAds("Right1"); On Nov 18, 4:06 am, Gerry Quinn <ger...@indigo.ie> wrote: > In article <ge17e7$l3...@fb07-hees.theo.physik.uni-giessen.de >, > jth...@astro.indiana-zebra.edu says... > > But there are of course many many many new developments which Einstein > > didn't know in 1915, or even in 1955 when he died. For example, the > > concept of a black hole...
Started 1 day, 8 hours ago (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
by Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
azeynel1@gmail.com wrote: > I commented that "if Einstein came back to Earth he would not > recognize his theory and he would be told to study MTW if he wanted to > learn General Relativity." As a response I was told that I did not > know GR so I should not posit such thing. I thought that was fair. So > what do experts here think? The assumption is that Einstein comes in > disguise,...
Started 10 months, 2 weeks ago (2008-01-09 06:00:00)
by Ian Parker
On 8 Jan, 02:03, Igor Khavkine <igor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 7, 8:00 am, Shubee <e.Shu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I recall hearing of a very interesting theorem ages ago. I believe it > > was in Ergodic theory. I believe that the theorem proved that every > > chaotic system exhibits predicable behavior. Does that theorem have a > > name? > > Just guessing here, but you may ...
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2008-10-06 22:22:46)
by Uncle Al
Shubee wrote: > > Researchers at the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and > Applied Science have succeeded in creating and capturing optical rogue > waves and have measured their statistical properties. They found that > these rogue waves obey "L-shaped" statistics. > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1212201239. htm > > Can this observation be accounted for directly from ...
Started 8 months, 2 weeks ago (2008-03-11 21:12:00)
by Stuffymonkey
Hi. I'm preparing a research proposal for class and I've finally decided to do variations on the double slit experiment. What I'm looking at doing is performing the basic experiment using a red laser, just so I can make sure I have a good understanding of how to do it. Then I think I will test the effects of infrared light, radio waves, and ultraviolet light rays. My physics teacher suggested ...
Started 2 weeks, 1 day ago (2008-11-07 14:21:10)
by lichen
DisplayAds("Right1"); Would Faraday rotation of light by magnetic field still occur if the light was being guided in a polarization maintaining fiber such as one with a highly birefringent core? What exactly would happen? I can think of three scenarios: 1. The azimuth of the light is rotated. 2. It is not rotated - nothing happens. 3. It tries to rotate but can...
Started 3 months ago (2008-08-20 05:00:00)
by chalky
On Aug 8, 8:16 am, mathki...@ureach.com wrote: > On Aug 7, 9:41 am, ANS <ar...@umich.edu> wrote: > > > Is there any empirical evidence that electromagnetic radiation > > produces gravitational fields? I don't think so. > > I understand that as a form of energy > > it is expected to induce a spacetime curvature, but has this > > prediction of GR actually been tested? Not ...
Started 5 months, 3 weeks ago (2008-06-01 05:00:00)
by Juan R. González-Álvarez
J. J. Lodder wrote on Fri, 30 May 2008 20:27:24 +0000: > Juan R. González-Ãlvarez <juanREMOVE@canonicalscience.com> wrote: > >> Cold fusion research has suffered from premature news, experimental >> mistakes, and one clear tendency to censorship and biased review. >> >> Did not you know that Julian Schwinger resigned as Member and Fellow of >> the American Physical Society in ...
Started 2 weeks, 1 day ago (2008-11-07 19:33:00)
by mheslep
Great post, except for Originally Posted by John Schutkeker ... ,because of Republican budget cuts at DOE, ... No, dont think that's true. The executive branch/DOE chose to shrink the ...
Started 2 weeks, 2 days ago (2008-11-07 06:00:00)
by Thomas Smid
It is obvious that two particles exerting a force on each other can not be in a strictly static equilibrium in the sense that they remain in the same positions (or maintain the same velocity vectors). That's how forces are defined. In order to have a truly static equilibrium one would need opposing forces of some kind which exactly cancel the interaction force. Thomas
|
|
Hot threads for last week on sci.physics.research::
Started 1 day, 8 hours ago (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
by Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
azeynel1@gmail.com wrote: > I commented that "if Einstein came back to Earth he would not > recognize his theory and he would be told to study MTW if he wanted to > learn General Relativity." As a response I was told that I did not > know GR so I should not posit such thing. I thought that was fair. So > what do experts here think? The assumption is that Einstein comes in > disguise,...
Started 10 months, 2 weeks ago (2008-01-09 06:00:00)
by Ian Parker
On 8 Jan, 02:03, Igor Khavkine <igor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 7, 8:00 am, Shubee <e.Shu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I recall hearing of a very interesting theorem ages ago. I believe it > > was in Ergodic theory. I believe that the theorem proved that every > > chaotic system exhibits predicable behavior. Does that theorem have a > > name? > > Just guessing here, but you may ...
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2008-10-06 22:22:46)
by Uncle Al
Shubee wrote: > > Researchers at the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and > Applied Science have succeeded in creating and capturing optical rogue > waves and have measured their statistical properties. They found that > these rogue waves obey "L-shaped" statistics. > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1212201239. htm > > Can this observation be accounted for directly from ...
Started 1 day, 8 hours ago (2008-11-22 00:00:00)
by Igor Khavkine
DisplayAds("Right1"); On Nov 18, 4:06 am, Gerry Quinn <ger...@indigo.ie> wrote: > In article <ge17e7$l3...@fb07-hees.theo.physik.uni-giessen.de >, > jth...@astro.indiana-zebra.edu says... > > But there are of course many many many new developments which Einstein > > didn't know in 1915, or even in 1955 when he died. For example, the > > concept of a black hole...
|
|
Size: 4,036 bytes
