Site Matters and Complaints (SMAC) | Forum profile

http://perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=217717&forum_id=108 greebid: no comment needed.. Attachment: spam_the_clown.jpg (Downloaded 6 times)

JP wrote: admin wrote: Sorry for the confusion here, there was a change in policy a while back not everyone was aware of.  My fault. Some of these threads will still go to science if deemed mostly scientific! Shame on you.. But huge big-up's to all our mods.. How dare you heap shame on the great one ,,,,,,,,you are biased.......

http://www.perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=217717&forum_id=108  

lightoftruth wrote: You are attacking dc-2's religion. What did you expect?,,,, ,,,,,bad,,,,,bad,,,,,, When posters post lies about Science and the process of empiricism, then they are attacking the only means we have of finding TRUTH, and at that point yes, you are attacking my religion.

JP wrote: lightoftruth wrote: JP wrote: admin wrote: Sorry for the confusion here, there was a change in policy a while back not everyone was aware of.  My fault. Some of these threads will still go to science if deemed mostly scientific! Shame on you.. But huge big-up's to all our mods.. How dare you heap shame on the great one ,,,,,,,,you are biased....... Biased.. ME?.. This is just a shameless rumour.. datsa rit JP is noting...

More spam spam spam spam spam!!!!! http://perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=217566&forum_id=67

S. wrote: well done radical maverick, you are on the case sniffing down clues. thanks.

ringotuna wrote: madmex1966 wrote: ringotuna wrote: JP wrote: TD wrote: Hughmac wrote: PS: Mr TD, there is another little matter, which is being looked into at the moment, and I hope that the results prove my suspicions to have been unfounded. I think you'll find that has been resolved and that your suspicions are completely unfounde. Thats a relief for you both then, I hope.. Dammit the suspense is killing me, but...none of my...

D wrote: Hughmac, if someone does a quick survey of your posts that cover the subject of Israel there is an obvious conclusion that just about anyone would draw. In the most general terms you do seem to come to the defense of the Palestinians in almost all occurrences.  While this may not be 100% true and you may indeed be able to produce a post where you condemned all terror type actions the vast majority of your posts on the issue...

Dr B wrote: I have spend hours posting solid proof of political fraud these last couple of days, from well respected sources like The Guardian. If you don't find the proof solid enough, that's okay. It is still a legitimate discussion, and one that is political and not scientific, because this is about covering up data for political purposes. I just don't see how anyone can be honest with themselves and say the evidence is...