Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Intel CPUs | Forum profile

Forum profile page for Intel CPUs on http://www.ocforums.com. This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Intel CPUs, located on the Message Board at http://www.ocforums.com. This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period. Additional forum profile information for "Intel CPUs" on the Message Board at http://www.ocforums.com is also shown in the following ways:

1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week

Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.

Site: Overclockers Forums - Intel CPUs (site profile, domain info ocforums.com)
Title: Intel CPUs
Url: http://www.ocforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2
Users activity: 5 posts per thread
Forum activity: 136 active threads during last week
 

Posting activity on Intel CPUs:

  Week Month 3 Months
Threads: 136 432 1,354
Post: 723 2,076 6,706
 

Intel CPUs Posting activity graph:

Posts by:  day  week  month 

Top authors during last week:

Name
Posts
redduc900
47
user's latest post:
Q9550 & XFX780i
Published (2009-11-23 18:17:00)
With a 45nm quad running at only 1.152 Vcore, core temp's (Tjunction) of > 70C and Tcase of 76C under load are way too high. You need to get yourself a better HSF.
feraswilson
37
user's latest post:
I'm running E7500 at 3.5GHz...
Published (2009-11-22 21:12:00)
I think this is enough for the E7500 running at 3.5GHz on Stock Cooler, though its not a big change in speed. Take a look here: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=842240 Thank you guys!
graysky
35
user's latest post:
I'm running E7500 at 3.5GHz...
Published (2009-11-22 21:04:00)
50 iterations @ 10k is a good start, but I'd serious up the problem set size to 15k or 20k and do 100 or so running overnight. Again, that E5600 I was working on @ 10.0x333 using a 20k problem set overnight for 11 or 12 h. You'll notice that it takes a good 4-5 min to complete the calculation compared to 30 sec on a 10k problem set. I've read examples of people passing 100s of smaller 8k-10k sets and failing after only 15-20...
EarthDog
32
user's latest post:
Help O/C'ing E8400 on EVGA...
Published (2009-11-23 17:19:00)
The general rule for that chipset is to stay away unless you need SLI. I didnt find it THAT bad, however there are more noteable issues with it than say the 965/X38/P35 chipsets that were around at the same time. Bump the NB up .1 and FSBt .1 and see if that helps.
doz
26
user's latest post:
First attempt @ OC the new rig.....
Published (2009-11-23 16:52:00)
Yes, some boards will allow the 21x multi (I believe the Intel like I have and one other STOCK, and some other Asus boards and possibly others have a mod'ed BIOS) and it will run full time on all 4 cores (8 threads). Technically 920 only has 20x and lower, but it seems to be more of a boards limitation, and not the CPU.
mattspalace
21
user's latest post:
Looking for help on i7 920 d0...
Published (2009-11-24 03:11:00)
I see several folks using LinX to test for stability. I'm old school I suppose and have been using Prime since I started overclocking. Either should work fine. With your i7 920, you should be able to reach 4GHz (20x200) without any issue. I would increase the voltage to about 1.25v and work your way down from there to check for stability; or if it's all good, try for a 21x multi and see what happens. Although I would also recommend...
Joeteck
20
user's latest post:
Overclocking guide... needed.
Published (2009-11-16 18:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by icebob with turbo and EIST enable you can go up to 26 multi [IMG] [/IMG] HOLY SH..CRAP... What are your temps?? BTW, that did it. Disable the HT cores. Now I'm @ 4Ghz Running Prime95 as I write this reply...
Vipersfate
18
user's latest post:
E5200 OC
Published (2009-11-22 21:04:00)
Okay. I got the memory timings set now as they should be with no OC on them. Things are running great, just gotta get the OC going. The only option under the Performance is Normal/Turbo, I figured Normal was standard. EDIT: Update. I can't get anything to go over stock with this board. I'm starting to think my PSU is too weak to do anything. It's 600w, but it's old, and beatup.
RollingThunder
17
user's latest post:
I'm running E7500 at 3.5GHz...
Published (2009-11-22 11:03:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by feraswilson CPU: 1.304 NB: AUTO SB: 1.5V DRAM: DDR2-6400 OC 1000MHz (Voltage Set AUTO) Memory timings: 5-5-5-18 FSB 2:3 Memory Wilson, You need to set your RAM voltage manually to the specs from the factory. "Auto" may not be set it correctly.
tanderson
15
user's latest post:
new to the scene working on Q8200
Published (2009-11-18 15:16:00)
have you upped the Vcore yet? try upping that a a few notches. im running mine at 2.62 ghz with a vcore of 1.3v, you should be around 400FSB with a vcore of that if you have yet to change that at all.
 

Latest active threads on Intel CPUs::

Overclockers Forums
Started 3 days, 4 hours ago (2009-11-24 09:20:00)  by kvn864
I had BIOS 18 and E0 Q9550. Never got them to work together, however I saw others did. Not sure what it depends to. At your own risk my friend.
Thread:  Show this thread (2 posts)   Thread info: Quick question about the IP35 Pro + E0 Q9650... Size: 187 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Quick question about the IP35 Pro + E0 Q9650... :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Overclockers Forums
Started 1 week, 5 days ago (2009-11-15 00:08:00)  by Bobnova
Thermal spec is where the cpu will run at max full load with the OEM heatsink if fed 30*c air. It has nothing to do with the max safe temp, which is Tjunction. Voltage... Yeah, i'd say it looks like 1.4v. However, i doubt you could get it there on air without hitting tjunction.
Thread:  Show this thread (8 posts)   Thread info: What is the max. safe voltage for i7-860? Size: 339 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: What is the max. safe voltage for i7-860? :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Overclockers Forums
Started 1 year, 4 months ago (2008-07-19 13:16:00)  by michaelcooper5
I have done a bit of rethinking and perhaps the gigabyte x48-dq6 would be a better choice of a motherboard. With the x48 is will have two 16 slot pci lanes and better performance.
Thread:  Show this thread (40 posts)   Thread info: Overclocking Q9550 Size: 246 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Update :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Overclockers Forums
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-20 02:28:00)  by eva2000
Next day benching, trying to see how I could go for Super Pi 1M so bumped vcore from 1.45v (1.44v) to 1.4875V (1.472V) and 1.50v (1.488v). With HT still enabled managed to pull of Super Pi 1M @4911Mhz at 1.472v and cpuz validation was @5011Mhz at 1.488v but it was corrupt so next saved validation was @4997Mhz at 1.488v Room ambients = ~31.4C System: Intel Xeon W3570 ...
Thread:  Show this thread (18 posts)   Thread info: Xeon W3570 @4997Mhz HT H20 ! Size: 2,261 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Xeon W3570 @4997Mhz HT H20 ! :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Overclockers Forums
Started 4 days, 10 hours ago (2009-11-23 02:52:00)  by mattspalace
Pretty high voltage there, but you are on water and your temps look fine. As far as being to high, it's debatable. On water, you're probably okay with ~1.5v, but you are likely shortening the life of your CPU.
Thread:  Show this thread (7 posts)   Thread info: First attempt @ OC the new rig..... Size: 292 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: First attempt @ OC the new rig..... :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Overclockers Forums
Started 5 days, 20 hours ago (2009-11-21 16:52:00)  by georanma
Got her up to 4.0. Getting a superpi 1m run around 10 seconds. Need to see how much more this thing can do. Sadly, I probably wont get much more without swapping out my water block.
Thread:  Show this thread (7 posts)   Thread info: i7 920 C0 Size: 405 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: i7 920 C0 :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Overclockers Forums
Started 9 months, 2 weeks ago (2009-02-13 06:57:00)  by Priv
That Vdrop and Vdroop are really high, you should maybe look in to a volt mod for your motherboard. Or if it has loadline callibration try turning that on. You should not have to change PLL voltage, so that should be left at 1.5V. Have you tried other FSB settings for 3.52 GHz? For example try it with a 9x multiplier.
Thread:  Show this thread (9 posts)   Thread info: Need helps stablize 3.52 GHz with Q6600 Size: 365 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Need helps stablize 3.52 GHz with Q6600 :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Overclockers Forums
Started 3 days, 10 hours ago (2009-11-24 03:11:00)  by mattspalace
I see several folks using LinX to test for stability. I'm old school I suppose and have been using Prime since I started overclocking. Either should work fine. With your i7 920, you should be able to reach 4GHz (20x200) without any issue. I would increase the voltage to about 1.25v and work your way down from there to check for stability; or if it's all good, try for a 21x ...
Thread:  Show this thread (2 posts)   Thread info: Looking for help on i7 920 d0 OCing to 4+ ghz. New to OCing. Size: 1,462 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Looking for help on i7 920 d0 OCing to 4+ ghz. New to OCing. :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
 

Hot threads for last week on Intel CPUs::

Intel CPUs
Started 6 days, 2 hours ago (2009-11-21 11:09:00)  by simviatoR
Run Prime95 or OCCT and we'll see if that stock heatsink keeps up
Thread:  Show this thread (72 posts)   Thread info: I'm running E7500 at 3.5GHz Stock Cooler! Size: 210 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: I'm running E7500 at 3.5GHz Stock Cooler! :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
RE: E5200 OC - 31 new post
Started 6 days, 14 hours ago (2009-11-20 23:27:00)  by HDCHOPPER
965 chipset...sounds like you may need a bios update...
Thread:  Show this thread (31 post)   Thread info: E5200 OC Size: 132 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: E5200 OC :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 09:37:00)  by MattNo5ss
If you haven't already, read through this thread: HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - A Guide v1.7 It looks like the highest OC you'll get will be 2.8GHz (7x400MHz). This is b/c of your RAM it's DDR2-800, so your FSB limited to 400MHz (I doubt your value RAM will OC to allow higher FSB). As for overheating, what CPU cooler and case+fans do you have?
Thread:  Show this thread (30 posts)   Thread info: Need info on Overclocking my q8200 in custom rig Size: 668 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Need info on Overclocking my q8200 in custom rig :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
RE: i7 920 oc problems - 29 new posts
Started 4 days, 13 hours ago (2009-11-22 23:34:00)  by baditude_df
You're at 4.0GHz. Those voltages and temperatures are fine. I can boot @4.0GHz with Vcore less than 1.2V, but to expect to run a perfectly stable 24/7 4GHz machine with a vcore of 1.18v is a bit unreasonable. Even with HT disabled you're likely looking at slightly higher that 1.2v for stability assuming everything else is in line. You should be able to get that Vcore down to ...
Thread:  Show this thread (29 posts)   Thread info: i7 920 oc problems Size: 535 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: i7 920 oc problems :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
RE: 4.5 stable?? i7 :D - 25 new posts
Started 6 days, 18 hours ago (2009-11-20 18:36:00)  by WarriorII
But is it fast?
Thread:  Show this thread (25 posts)   Thread info: 4.5 stable?? i7 :D Size: 92 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: 4.5 stable?? i7 :D :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-17 16:18:00)  by Neuromancer
i7 920 has hyper-threading. x58 boards can be had pretty cheap and will support i9 next year (no cold bug? OOOO) Hyper-threading will help in encoding, although at that low a resolution you can probably get by with ATI/nVidia encoding options (GPU based and usually faster) and not be annoyed with the crap quality For watching movies, I would not invest in either ...
Thread:  Show this thread (37 posts)   Thread info: i5 750 ($150) or i7 920 ($200)? Help Please Size: 1,137 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: i5 750 ($150) or i7 920 ($200)? Help Please :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
Started 6 days, 14 hours ago (2009-11-20 22:41:00)  by gottcha
did you lock you pcix @100? and that much vcore should let that chip reach 3.6 also try setting everything you can in manual like your ram volts and anything else you can. sorry i can't be more help but i'm not familiar with your board
Thread:  Show this thread (21 post)   Thread info: Overclocking a Q6600 question Size: 349 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Overclocking a Q6600 question :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-20 02:28:00)  by eva2000
Next day benching, trying to see how I could go for Super Pi 1M so bumped vcore from 1.45v (1.44v) to 1.4875V (1.472V) and 1.50v (1.488v). With HT still enabled managed to pull of Super Pi 1M @4911Mhz at 1.472v and cpuz validation was @5011Mhz at 1.488v but it was corrupt so next saved validation was @4997Mhz at 1.488v Room ambients = ~31.4C System: Intel Xeon W3570 ...
Thread:  Show this thread (18 posts)   Thread info: Xeon W3570 @4997Mhz HT H20 ! Size: 2,261 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Xeon W3570 @4997Mhz HT H20 ! :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
Started 5 days, 22 hours ago (2009-11-21 14:51:00)  by Neuromancer
Interesting. maybe if you could do more research on it, find out what you can pull from the CD that is extraneous and does not effect the stability testing. That would be much better to get widespread testing done also not cause falsely inflated usage numbers for a single distro.
Thread:  Show this thread (18 posts)   Thread info: A nearly instantaneous stability test? Size: 493 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: A nearly instantaneous stability test? :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"
Intel CPUs
RE: Q9550 & XFX780i - 17 new posts
Started 4 days, 23 hours ago (2009-11-22 13:35:00)  by redduc900
Use this template for the XFX 780i to post all of your current BIOS settings at 3.19GHz (just disregard the settings in the template, and replace w/ your own)... Code: Advance Chipset Features System Clocks ** Frequency Setting ** CPU Multiplier - x9 PCIe x16_3, MHz - 120 SSP<->MCP Ref Clock, MHZ - 250.0 ** HT Multiplier ** nforce SPP --> nForce MCP 4 x...
Thread:  Show this thread (17 posts)   Thread info: Q9550 & XFX780i Size: 3,358 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Q9550 & XFX780i :: Intel CPUs :: Overclockers Forums"

This page was found by:   setfsb t3400