Omaha High/Low Poker | Forum profile

loool ya i thought there were 2 low cards on board for some reason. i read the hand, remembered that we hand 2nd nuts and low wasnt a threat, then when i started writing the post the board somehow changed in my mind to T87 or something but yeah with only one low card our equity looks a bit better. backdoor low draws hit around 20%-30% depending on how many cards he's got to the low

HuJwang wrote: Zophar wrote: craigo6x wrote: Zophar wrote: W/o running it through propokertools, I think your equity here is a lot worse than it appears. Granted you have two T blockers, but that only means so much. Vs a higher FD/set and backdoor lowdraw, I think it's really thin. I folded...they both showed down Q 10 without redraws. This is why you can't over estimate the blockers, good fold. i was gonna say he probably could...

Haha. I've seen people in a 9 handed game call with 2nd pair and a gut shot draw. Probably not a misclick.

I'd be curious about sng strategy. Same strategy on a smaller time scale?

Take a look tell me what ya think. Thought I would try and double up here......... Full Tilt Poker Game #16514303633: $5 + $0.50 Tournament (122124753), Table 9 - 120/240 - Pot Limit Omaha H/L - 22:31:25 ET - 2009/12/03 Seat 1: chadzeus (19,468) Seat 2: exactabox14 (11,509) Seat 4: pittftw (9,698) Seat 5: Token320 (1,822) Seat 6: nimos48 (852) Seat 7: gilbertg24 (75), is sitting out Seat 8: vbfranc (170), is sitting out Seat 9: mdavids2...

Against two people, considering your blockers, I'd be more worried that you were against a made straight and a better flush draw... with the BD low draw as an additional problem. So yea, I say good fold. Once they both showed QT no redraws, I'd be pissed that I didn't get it in with my flush draw vs 2 others, but that's results oriented thinking obv.