Domain Name Discussion | Forum profile

Originally Posted by Brujah Does anyone know who the Snapnames user 'lightning' is? Havent seen him for a few years but i remember him in the early days....i still have to go back over ALL my auctions and check bidding history. Ill keep an eye out for him between 2005-2007. __________________ Domain Philanthropy :love:

Originally Posted by Cronus ...I'm not going to just let Snap keep the money, and I'm not going to sign the outrageous release either. This seems like the wise thing to do for smaller amounts. I think people who are owed less than low $xxx will have a better outcome going the CA route. But for those offered something like $xx,xxx (and up), I would think it wise to sign the waiver. Just my two cents. IMO.

That is another problem with Cats.pro, and .PRO in general as it is. From the start the potential field of end users is much smaller than other respected TLD's that don't have the restrictions. Brad Originally Posted by akcampbell You've got to go for a vet who specialises in cats rather than a cat breeder or enthusiast, the latter won't be eligible to register .pro. __________________ DataCube.com - Buy and Sell Premium...

Peter i think microguy means that you have nothing to lose going the class action for a few hundred bucks, but with several $xxxxx or above you risk not getting any money. Personally i think it's the opposite, i would think it better to take a settlement at some stage for $xxx and/or look for damages with $xxxxx or above. Thats my take anyway.

Originally Posted by Cronus Wrong. Both Snapnames and GoDaddy have previously made mistakes and refunded me thousands of dollars in total without making me sign anything. The law already prevents me from suing for (and winning) money I've already been paid. And did those other mistakes get caused by fraud?

Dongsman, I totally agree about not blaming Moniker. Apart from my obvious concern with SnapNames (and I think that goes for the majority of domainers as well) is now with the parent company Oversee.com. I have never had a dispute with Moniker and the 'old' Moniker used to be looked on as a shinning example of a good company within the industry, but lately more complaints it appears are surfacing and one has the feeling that the...

Originally Posted by equity78 I think Monte or Bari should use this thread, to at least explain the corporate structure at Oversee with regard to Moniker and that there is proper business liability insurance to protect Moniker. Conglomerates can bankrupt one business while leaving other businesses in tact. Someone should explain the structure there. Again IMO Agreed. Something needs to restore our confidence in the family. I have this...

Yeah, damage control was the first thing to pop into my head too (cheap renewals = preventing exodus), but I'll probably be taking advantage of this on renewals... Hope it all goes well. I think this will blow over. I'm pretty sure that Snap and Moniker are two different entities under one parent company. Not saying this means that people shouldn't be very aware of what happens at Oversee, but it probably isn't fair to...

* Vaxis is Kevin Ham. This is fairly common knowledge, I believe. *

Rob is here only to fool us. Don't ask questions, they are pointless.. the entire company is involved in this scam. All of them will face the LAW and will realize the mistake they have made! Justice will be served for this matter. Their is no way, your company is going to blame this on one man! __________________ A nation that destroys its soils destroys itself. Forests are the lungs of our land, purifying the air and giving fresh...