AT&T Wireless | Forum profile

tlvp wrote in news

In article , Larry wrote: Show me where this webpage is, please, YouTube using H264. it's automatic. Everything you've said, so far, is each station has its own "app" to make it play. i didn't say each station has its own app. some do, but there are also apps such as shoutcast, which supports over 25,000 different stations. there are also apps for listening to a police scanner, air traffic control and weather...

In message George was claimed to have wrote: You keep on insisting you don't want or need portability so why deride the choices others have made that fit in with their requirements? My guess is that it's a bit of stubbornness and either a bit of bitterness/envy, or just a desire to argue.

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:41:47 -0500, Cosmo wrote: On Dec 8, 7:46 pm, tlvp wrote: SMS recently spoke of the iPod touch, in this NG, as a "portable WiFi enabled browsing tool." I'd welcome a brief but thorough tutorial on how to achieve that goal, complete with iPod models to seek, to avoid, keyboard options, etc. Any hope, as well, for using an unlocked Sierra Wireless USB AirCard as a 3G cellular data modem with it? TIA....

nospam wrote: In article , WindsorFox wrote: Now, imagine the effect if just one manufacturer, say, HP started sipping their machines with a self branded Linux OS like Apple does. os x is not a 'self branded linux os', and if hp did do that, they might sell more than shipping yet another windows box. Correct it's more a self branded version of BSD, but you understoood my point.... -- .. "A smorgasbord of...

At 11 Dec 2009 18:15:09 -0500 tlvp wrote: Japan, on the other hand -- do you know whether the N900's 3G is compatible there (using some local Nipponese carrier's data SIM)? Dennis already answered that, but yes- the 2100MHz freq covers you there. Well, I must say $500, though rich for my tastes, is a whole lot more acceptable than the $800 or so I found it for on Amazon :-) , particularly if the device won't be as...

Peter Pan wrote: "WindsorFox[SS]" wrote in message ... But, isn't *this* the web??? No, it's not. The is usenet, which (currently) runs on the internet. The web also runs on the internet. You have to use Google to get the Internet.... -- umm... you do know that google is *NOT* the internet don't you, and you don't have to ever use google at all to use the internet don't you? Come to think of it,...

DevilsPGD wrote: In message SMS was claimed to have wrote: Can't blame Apple for not bothering with iTunes for Linux. The market is so small that it's not worth the effort. OSX is generally in the same ballpark, but obviously Apple has an incentive to keep OSX supported. In the end-user market, OSX penetration far exceeds that of Linux. Only when you count servers does Linux have a measurable market share in the total market.

On 2009-12-11, tlvp wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:29 -0500, Todd Allcock wrote: "tlvp" wrote in message news

On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:46:59 -0800, Mark Crispin wrote in nda.com: AT&T has turned and run with its tail between its legs, dropping its lawsuit over Verizon's "There's A Map For That". Last month, a judge rejected AT&T's request to force Verizon to pull the ads, ruling that Verizon's ads clearly talked about 3G coverage. Suffering nationwide ridicule, AT&T dropped its lawsuit. In...