SCOX: Message Board for Sco Group Inc | Forum profile

December 30, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. at the request of the Court.    Let me guess: somehow this will have to be postponed again because someone will be surprised by the holidays.     msg 95618

Well, seems to me, and I do not know the ins and outs of BK law, that the creditors could file a motion for conversion to Chapter 7, if there are irregularities or un-due motion towards getting the company re-organized and out of BK or towards Chapter 7 liquidation at some unknown distant point. If the exact finances and status of the company were not timely reported prior to assignment of a Trustee, and by all indications are still not being...

... walterbyrd has the highest successful prediction rate of any poster on this board (and previously Y!SCOX) ...   Could you please provide the statistical breakdown of predictions on this board and on Yahoo so we can verify this statement? My own predictions are usually wrong, so I'm eager to learn from a master.   ... could also be considered a version of Critical Legal Studies (a term from the 1970s/80s)...

SCO was willing to grant a license to all of their precious IP in Linux for no consideration whatsoever . . . .. I'm sure IBM would agree to offer similar compensation.   IBM could be generous and offer them much greater compensation.   Let's say, the sum of $5 US.   (Not five Billion, just five.) That might actually be even funnier for all posterity to remember Darl.     msg 95574

>>> Isn't Cahn * personally * liable for filing accurate and timely reports with the SEC?  <<< Well yeah, but that is enforced by the bankruptcy court.  Does a rule actually exist if it is only enforced by judge Gross? msg 95600

Certificate of No Objection Regarding Motion of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP for Leave to Withdraw as Co-Counsel to the Debtors ------- They are out of this mess. PSZ&J are hoping to receive the rest of their $111K, which seems to be overdue. msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '

>>>Congrat's Blue - very reasonable right now (but then I may be the only one on) <<< It's much worse here - and that's on a Sunday afternoon! msg 95645

Congrat's Blue - very reasonable right now (but then I may be the only one on) msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '

<The tribunal is not under the jurisdiction of the BK court.> Well, the "arbitration" tribunal proceeds IF both parties submit to its findings. Since both parties are currently forbidden to do that by the BK court, I'd say the tribunal is without authority and they know it. msg 95564

Get the transcript on EPIQ Not a super deep-link because of expiring cookies .   Al P. off-the-cuff version is mostly precise (as we have learned to expect).  The official version gives a wink-and-a-nod sense about the "meritorious and agressive" approach to litigation.  The two judges appear to be setting up a mediation.  Cahn says he has another meeting scheduled with IBM.  ...