Posts Topics Forums Images
Search videos from message boards Videos Search messages from microblogs Microblogs Search messages from imdb.com Imdb Search messages from yuku.com Yuku Search messages from lefora.com (free forums) Lefora
My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. | Forum profile

Forum profile page for RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. on http://www.investorvillage.com. This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. , located on the Message Board at http://www.investorvillage.com. This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period. Additional forum profile information for "RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. " on the Message Board at http://www.investorvillage.com is also shown in the following ways:

1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week

Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.

Site: InvestorVillage: Stock Message Boards - RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. (site profile, domain info investorvillage.com)
Title: RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc.
Url: http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=3666...
Users activity: 1 post per thread
Forum activity: 480 active threads during last week
 

Posting activity on RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. :

  Week Month 3 Months
Threads: 480 1,398 2,306
Post: 480 1,398 2,306
 

RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. Posting activity graph:

Posts by:  day  week  month 

Top authors during last week:

Name
Posts
sabatino
18
user's latest post:
Sue Robinson (Federal judges in...
Published (2009-12-01 20:45:00)
Sound Familiar? Bongiovanni in New Jersey withheld a ruling pending Robinson's fact finding and later gave the lawyers an opportunity to argue the pros and cons of the Delaware findings. She didn't even get to the issue of confusion. "New Jersey simply does not permit concurrent representation when the interests of two current clients are adverse," Bongiovanni said, quoting Celgene Corp., v. KV Pharmaceutical Corp. , 2008...
taxitall
17
user's latest post:
HH excerpts on why they could...
Published (2009-12-04 22:56:00)
Taken literally and, more importantly, out of context and with no knowledge of Rambus' previous behavior as regards making comments about settlements or litigation or litigants .... you would probably be right. But there is history and context. And in view of that history, and in that context .... the statements made by Hughes are taken to mean much more than the very [VERY] limited statement which you suggest.  ...
Rambiskit
15
user's latest post:
anyone know why hynix can't...
Published (2009-12-05 21:04:00)
You are confusing the questions of what Rambus might do (might want to do (or not do)) with the question of what they could do, given that we all agree about the need for the CAFC to rule on Robinson's ruling. They are not the same thing. msg 453128
mreich
14
user's latest post:
anyone know why hynix can't...
Published (2009-12-05 20:11:00)
wrong...   Should Rambus and Hynix settle, dropping the CAFC appeal,  then HJW's decision becomes case law and then the only issue is MIcron and the Rob-us-some Ruling....   Should the case have been transferred and should it still be transferred to the remaining Micron Case in NDCA that is currently stayed.???   Michael msg 453122
mutualhelper
12
user's latest post:
perhaps the 26 on the roulette...
Published (2009-12-03 09:49:00)
msporter21
12
user's latest post:
Judge Kramer - December 3rd |...
Published (2009-12-04 00:30:00)
drive and longusa, That was excellent reporting, you guys must be quick with pen and paper. JK seems very precise and sincere, but there's something very wrong with the private practice of common law. Before our members get excited, I would recall how this Rambus spoliation issue came about in the first place. If you may recall from years ago, Rambus spoliation was never a genuine issue of fact, it was a legal defense strategy. Eventhough...
pkram
11
user's latest post:
Markets positive. COMP up 15, MU...
Published (2009-12-03 09:54:00)
usn_wxman
11
user's latest post:
$60 to $150 ? come on you...
Published (2009-12-05 22:28:00)
Depends if they can get to $7.50 E at a 20 P. That would be 787,500,000 or 3/4 billion per year in earnings. Now, if you assign a 30 P, that would only require $5 E or $525,000,000 Incidentally and FYI, $26,250,000,000 x .02 = $525,000,000.00 So, yeah, I think its possible. And ~IF~ Rambus cracks the code and gets everyone using their IP to pay for it, its not only probable, its inevitable. Why do you think they did what they did for so long?...
getupthereboy
10
user's latest post:
OT: check sen BUNNING statement...
Published (2009-12-04 06:52:00)
you can watch it on youtube unbelievable msg 452207
j519bubba
9
user's latest post:
Futures green, thanks for...
Published (2009-12-04 06:21:00)
 

Latest active threads on RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. ::

No activity within last 3 months.

 

Hot threads for last week on RMBS: Message Board for Rambus, Inc. ::

No active threads for last week.

This page was found by:   rmbs message board  rambus forum  investor village RAMBUS