|
More site info...
DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. on http://www.investorvillage.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. , located on the Message Board at http://www.investorvillage.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. " on the Message Board at http://www.investorvillage.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. :
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
36
|
53
|
257
|
|
Post:
|
36
|
54
|
258
|
|
|
DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Shorties covering fast whenever...
Published (2009-07-06 11:22:00)
wonder 050s support base in line with DCSO's "intrinsic value"? who knows! msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
user's latest post:
If sold, what is DSCO worth? |...
Published (2009-07-03 11:32:00)
Thelin was tracking $50 million sales when PFE bought it. Last I saw it was still outselling Letaris. DSCO fetching a X10 over today's price? Only in your dreams. msg 2901
user's latest post:
Just heard the news...very very...
Published (2009-07-02 13:55:00)
Very different stock with issues that one can only speculate on. Of the two former directors re-elected, one was the CEO about whom there wouldn't seem to be any qualms. Polaris Geothermal Power is a Canadian company that has operations only in Nicaragua. And it is that "only in Nicaragua" that may have led to impatience on the part of a couple of big investors. One of the directors who...
user's latest post:
If sold, what is DSCO worth? |...
Published (2009-07-05 21:23:00)
Licenses aren't my area -what would the KL4 technology license say about commercialization? Would a competitor need to buy DSCO or could they just buy the KL4 license from the licensor. How can someone get rid of the DSCO management and board? msg 2903
user's latest post:
New clinical trial 07/06/2009...
Published (2009-07-08 11:18:00)
Effect of Lucinactant on Mucus Clearance in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease This study is currently recruiting participants. Verified by The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, July 2009 First Received: July 6, 2009 Last Updated: July 7, 2009 History of Changes Sponsors and Collaborators: The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Discovery Laboratories Information provided by: The...
user's latest post:
Does not look promising | DSCO...
Published (2009-07-01 17:15:00)
Just out on the news wire http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/090701/168260.html?.v=1 Looks like we are in for quite a delay Best of luck with your investments R msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
user's latest post:
Just heard the news...very very...
Published (2009-07-01 19:22:00)
It does seem that DSCO exist under a black cloud...aka FDA. I suspected that DSCO finally had it in the bag...but it never quite fell enough this last time for me to give it another try. I hope none of you guys got hurt badly. msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
user's latest post:
Just heard the news...very very...
Published (2009-07-01 20:57:00)
"It does seem that DSCO exist under a black cloud...aka FDA." This time I am not sure this was an FDA problem rather than a DSCO problem all along. One would think that they had already agreed in the SPA what the FDA viewed as validation of the batches Vs what was used in the trials!!! It seems to me that what the FDA wanted and what DSCO gave them were two different things and that DSCO management...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. ::
Started 1 day, 21 hours ago (2009-07-08 11:18:00)
by Safyst
Effect of Lucinactant on Mucus Clearance in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease This study is currently recruiting participants. Verified by The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, July 2009 First Received: July 6, 2009 Last Updated: July 7, 2009 History of Changes Sponsors and Collaborators: The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Cystic ...
Started 2 days, 3 hours ago (2009-07-08 05:33:00)
by Safyst
I thoght the June, 30th 10-Q release in regards to this matter was confusing: From page 14, At the June 18, 2008 meeting, the FDA asked us to augment our previously-generated data by conducting additional tests using the Biological Activity Test at a dose of 5.8 mL/kg, rather than the dose of 8.0 mL/kg that we have historically employed for Surfaxin release and stability testing....
Started 2 days, 22 hours ago (2009-07-07 10:55:00)
by LongInTooth
Must be overloaded with Michael Jackson fans. Anyway, I got back into DSCO yesterday @ $.4575. I'd be satisfied with a 50 percent gain. msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
Started 3 days, 21 hours ago (2009-07-06 11:22:00)
by mlkr
wonder 050s support base in line with DCSO's " intrinsic value"? who knows! msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
Started 4 days, 11 hours ago (2009-07-05 21:23:00)
by darkdogzzz
Licenses aren't my area -what would the KL4 technology license say about commercialization? Would a competitor need to buy DSCO or could they just buy the KL4 license from the licensor. How can someone get rid of the DSCO management and board? msg 2903
Started 4 days, 11 hours ago (2009-07-05 21:15:00)
by darkdogzzz
If DSCO had an SPA for this it would be mentioned front and center in the press releases. Crappi's spouting "new standard" not "they didn't honor the SPA". IMO DSCO knew they were on thin ice and never asked straight out what the exact standard was -so they continue to try and probide data and would not have to report, a long time ago, that they couldn't meet the FDA expectations. IMO opinion...
Started 6 days, 20 hours ago (2009-07-03 12:42:00)
by mtdinanm3
You're joking right? I was also in ENCY before the PFE buyout and your analysis is faulty. Thelin actually had significant sales in the EU and PFE actually stole the whole company cheaply by taking advantage of its cash weakness and needing to fund another PH3 trial. ENCY's competitor, MYOG, was bought out for $2+ billion and they didn't even have a selling product yet. DSCO on the other ...
Started 6 days, 21 hours ago (2009-07-03 11:32:00)
by Bully_gates
Thelin was tracking $50 million sales when PFE bought it. Last I saw it was still outselling Letaris. DSCO fetching a X10 over today's price? Only in your dreams. msg 2901
Started 6 days, 21 hours ago (2009-07-03 11:27:00)
by pccure
Thelin had little sales in EU and Canada.If it had sig sales ENCY would have been worth more.Correct about the Surfaxin tech does not have any sales BUT this is a new paradigm shift (synthetic vs animal) in the way respiratory distress would be treated.DSCO has done ALL of the heavy lifting regarding safety and efficacy trials.95% of the effort and costs are now behind the company with all that ...
Started 1 week ago (2009-07-03 07:21:00)
by Bully_gates
You and I have the ENCY data point. PFE bought ENCY at about 2X its share price at the time. But ENCY had real sales of Thelin in the EU and Canada. DSCO has no obvious means for revenue. I doubt that it would fetch more than cash plus some value attached to the IP. msg 2899
|
|
Hot threads for last week on DSCO: Message Board for Discovery Laboratories Inc. ::
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-02 02:49:00)
by terryhallinan
With maybe a quibble or two, this post seems to me to be right on target. It seems to me that what the FDA wanted and what DSCO gave them were two different things and that DSCO management thought that they could pull the wool over the eyes of the FDA and/or over the eyes of investors... I would put that a bit differently. My view is that Capetola was so busy keeping his ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-01 17:46:00)
by mlkr
what are midterm prospects..? 52 weeks low was 072.. msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-01 18:18:00)
by travfourr
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-01 18:27:00)
by darkdogzzz
I can only hope that someone from CORNERSTONE reads this post. Please, buy these sorry B@#$%^ds out and finish this technology, which on its face, looks promising. I haven't seen any great things come from Chiesi's synthetic surfactant work, so why not buy a cheap, validated (ooooh, sorry I used that dirty word here....) technology? I KNOW Chiesi knows how to get an approval in the US. And ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-01 17:15:00)
by nd02fr2
Just out on the news wire http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/090701/168260.html?.v=1 Looks like we are in for quite a delay Best of luck with your investments R msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-02 08:13:00)
by terryhallinan
it appears. They are not that smart: Insider Transaction History Date Name-Position Transaction Shares Price Range ($) Shares Held Mkt Value 11/18/08 Rosenthale Marvin E Director Purchase 75,000 0.90 – 1.00 350,000...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-02 08:20:00)
by terryhallinan
It is possible to dream up some kind of head fake and perhaps even find Capetola and henchmen were saving family and/or friends buty aside from that, I don't see how you can explain the insider buys. I am not quarreling with any claim that the purported new standard is a crock. I simply don't know but doubt the FDA would concede to the claim even if there were. Best, Terry msg 2889...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-02 08:35:00)
by Bully_gates
Shouldn't the SPA have specified which model to use? And if the FDA agreed to it, how can they change now? msg 2888
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-02 06:52:00)
by darkdogzzz
Crappi knew all along what the FDA wanted. He used the public forum to try and negotiate FDA into approval. That's why they hate him. He had a face for FDA and a face for the investors. FDA doesn't have a new standard. Its the same old standard. If you think FDA will let Crappi rub their face in it with this "new standard" press release and then try to get other product approvals from the ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-07-02 05:57:00)
by Bully_gates
It is not at all clear to me how the FDA can impose a "new standard" at this late date in the face of the SPA, but taking Cappy's words at face value, they did. Seems to me he has one of two choices: appeal or find someone to buy what is left. There ain't much. He is back to a early development stage company and limited financing. msg ' + item.replyToNumber + '
|
|
