|
More site info...
Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows on http://www.intel.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows, located on the Message Board at http://www.intel.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows" on the Message Board at http://www.intel.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
21
|
216
|
775
|
|
Post:
|
43
|
511
|
2,000
|
|
|
Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Array Visualizer + IVF 11.1 ?
Published (2009-11-24 10:23:00)
No, you don't have to link anything. Try running the repair tool linked here . -------- Steve Attaching or including files in a post Doctor Fortran blog @DoctorFortran on Twitter
user's latest post:
stack overflow
Published (2009-11-24 06:54:00)
stack overflow is likely to be fixed by the standard /link /stack:nnnnnnnnn described in your CVF help. I've become rusty on the CVF facilities for checking syntax errors, but it looks like you should be turning all of them on (subscript range check, uninitialized variables, consistent CALL arguments). When people say "fortran 77" they often mean lots of non-standard stuff, not f77, but CVF does support the most usual...
user's latest post:
single-theaded and...
Published (2009-11-23 10:29:00)
Quoting - Steve Lionel (Intel) No, it is not the processor (or at least that would be the last thing I would suspect). What is the exact nature of the problem? The compiler options I am using are the following /nologo /O3 /Og /Qipo /free /Qopenmp-report0 /Qpar-report0 /Qvec-report0 /warn:declarations /warn:unused /warn:ignore_loc /warn:truncated_source /warn:interfaces /real_size:64 /module:"Release/" /object:"Release/"...
user's latest post:
Sub program help
Published (2009-11-23 07:38:00)
I considered this option however the program runs iterations in the region of 10^(12) or more in some cases. This seems like a really large data which is why im now considering only storing the previous three.
user's latest post:
how to set entry point
Published (2009-11-24 06:25:00)
Quoting - tim18 Normally, you would not use a Fortran main as well as a C++ main. Your C++ would call a Fortran procedure set up with iso_c_binding (although that came years later than your C++) or equivalent Windows-specific interfacing. Hi tim, actually the code is in 'C' language and i just renamed the file names to .cpp. Is there any settings option that I need to set as iso_c_binding to run as c main? Because when i am...
user's latest post:
A trick to run cvf on vista
Published (2009-11-23 18:18:00)
Quoting - Steve Lionel (Intel) I didn't have trouble with CVF on Vista, once I learned to run DevStudio "as administrator". CVF installs on Windows 7 x64 but won't run. Yeath. Sometimes it worked fine for me without change. But it was not the always case. I also find there are others in my condition, so I paste my method.
user's latest post:
Trouble with runtime...
Published (2009-11-24 09:09:00)
Quoting - Steve Lionel (Intel) Probably the simplest solution is to add /MT (Multithread static library) to your Fortran command (fl32). Make sure that your C compile also specifies this. /MD (multithread DLL) is an alternative. Many thanks Steve, that has fixed those build problems ( /MD was what I needed). I have a couple of other issues which I think are unrelated and then we get to see what happens when I run it ;-)
user's latest post:
Array Visualizer + IVF 11.1 ?
Published (2009-11-24 09:10:00)
Hi, this is a follow up on the previous thread because I still don't see the solution: 1) I use Intel Visual Fortran Compiler v11.1 2) I have installed Array Visualizer v3.3 Currently, on right click of an array I wish to display I cannot select the "View Array" Option. So I guess I have to link the Compiler with the Visualizer. But... How do I link the Compiler with the Visualizer, i.e., how do I add the path? Would this be...
user's latest post:
WriteConsoleInput -> read
Published (2009-11-24 09:00:00)
Dear Fortran friends, I try to get my program to work with "11.1 build 51" as it did in "11.0.072" and a few earlier compilers. In one thread I use -- WriteConsoleInput() -- to write to the console, while another thread wait in a -- READ(i,20,END=10)strtmp 20 FORMAT(A) -- to receive the command as a text string. This used to work well... but then I try with 11.1 and there the fun ends. Prior to 11.1 the READ exits when...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows::
Started 4 months, 3 weeks ago (2009-07-14 10:34:00)
by Steve Lionel (Intel)
// this is an IE specific issue fix for HTML with " /" characters in it which IE looks at like " /" instead and does not line break it.
$(function(){
if ($.browser.msie)
$("[id^='reply_text_']") .css({"overflow-x":"scroll","overflow-y":""});
});
I'll check out the broken link - it worked just a few weeks ago, I know. ...
Started 2 weeks, 2 days ago (2009-11-18 19:55:00)
by David White
Quoting - nuaabill
Need a Fortran 10.1 Windows 64 edition. I have bought a license, but when I enter the download page, there is only v11.1. It seems mismatch with ABAQUS6.9.2. Thus, I need a previous version, like 10.1. Where can I get it? Thanks!!!
Steve Lionael previously posted this info ... There is a Knowledge Base article linked in the ...
Started 3 weeks, 3 days ago (2009-11-10 08:52:00)
by Steve Lionel (Intel)
Moved to separate thread -------- Steve
Attaching or including files in a post
Doctor Fortran blog
@DoctorFortran on Twitter
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-24 05:46:00)
by Steve Lionel (Intel)
Probably the simplest solution is to add /MT (Multithread static library) to your Fortran command (fl32). Make sure that your C compile also specifies this. /MD (multithread DLL) is an alternative. -------- Steve
Attaching or including files in a post
Doctor Fortran blog
@DoctorFortran on Twitter
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-24 06:54:00)
by tim18
stack overflow is likely to be fixed by the standard /link /stack:nnnnnnnnn described in your CVF help. I've become rusty on the CVF facilities for checking syntax errors, but it looks like you should be turning all of them on (subscript range check, uninitialized variables, consistent CALL arguments). When people say "fortran 77" they often mean lots of non-...
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-24 06:17:00)
by tim18
Normally, you would not use a Fortran main as well as a C++ main. Your C++ would call a Fortran procedure set up with iso_c_binding (although that came years later than your C++) or equivalent Windows-specific interfacing.
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-24 06:40:00)
by tim18
DATA initializes static (SAVEd, since 1990) variables. 6HLINEAR is pre-1977 syntax for 'LINEAR' (a string of characters). Although you haven't showed it, there seems a good chance that your code uses non-portable syntax (as there was no good alternative prior to 1977). WRITE(3,146) is still standard syntax, should be explained in any Fortan summary of any era. ...
Started 4 weeks ago (2009-11-06 07:12:00)
by Steve Lionel (Intel)
Your user has configured his system for the French(Belgium) language. We don't provide localization for that language, so when a diagnostic is to be issued, it's telling you that it will provide English. However, I'd ask why you are explicitly linking to the obsolete libguide.lib? I'd suggest libiomp5md.lib instead, which is compatible with OpenMP used by MSVC....
Started 1 year, 1 month ago (2008-10-13 18:41:00)
by Mark Ayres
Quoting - ISN Admin
We're well into the 21st century, so when are we going to get FORTRAN development tools which match the age?
Developing in, say, VB.NET is a real dream. Coming back to FORTRAN and you wonder what it's been up to for the last 10 years. Why aren't the development tools as mature as the language?
Intellisense: I know the usual ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Intel® Visual Fortran Compiler for Windows::
No active threads for last week.
|
|