|
More site info...
Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X on http://www.intel.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X, located on the Message Board at http://www.intel.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X" on the Message Board at http://www.intel.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
27
|
124
|
447
|
|
Post:
|
65
|
268
|
1,022
|
|
|
Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
Ronald W. Green (Intel)
15
user's latest post:
Large Arrays: using...
Published (2009-12-03 08:52:00)
And as for memory versus data files: memory reads are around 3 orders of magnitude faster. So why not put all the data hard-coded in the program using DATA statements or other explicit initialization? Certainly for data that does not change over time this is something to consider. For example, phase tables of water (steam tables) will never change over time (hopefully). Good candidate for putting into a program in a table without...
user's latest post:
Poor performance using openmp
Published (2009-12-03 14:36:00)
Quoting - Tiago De Assis Silva !$omp parallel do do j = 1,ny do i = 1,nx ...... if(j==1) then dudy(i,j) = u(i,j+1)-u(i,j) elseif(j==ny) then dudy(i,j) = u(i,j)-u(i,j-1) else dudy(i,j) = u(i,j+1)-u(i,j-1) endif enddo enddo Explicit race conditions don't help parallel performance.
user's latest post:
code highlighting in intel...
Published (2009-12-03 08:09:00)
The forums use a variant of the popular TinyMCE editor which does not include Fortran highlighting. Just use "Plain". I have asked that Fortran be added as an option, but it's a lot of work for not much benefit, in my opinion. -------- Steve Attaching or including files in a post Doctor Fortran blog @DoctorFortran on Twitter
user's latest post:
code highlighting in intel...
Published (2009-12-03 00:04:00)
Intel Forums have two subforums dedicated to Fortran but when using the code highlight tool when posting there's no option for fortran syntax... discrimination against the language? -------- Ricardo Reis 'Non Serviam' @ Lasef @ Rádio Zero @ volunteer work in aircraft restoration @ flickr
user's latest post:
Large Arrays: using...
Published (2009-12-02 19:35:00)
Wow, very interesting. That explains the fact that my frustrated move of turning everything into static arrays did not help at all. They don't call it the curse of many dimensions for nothing... time to turn this project over to the supercomputer, I think. One other question, if the answer is readily available: I frequently come up with questions regarding optimization for which I am probably not educated enough to design good...
user's latest post:
Poor performance using openmp
Published (2009-12-03 14:33:00)
what are your run time differences (single thread versis 4 threads)? Jim Demspey -------- Blog: The Parallel Void www.quickthreadprogramming.com
user's latest post:
unsupported install (fedora 11...
Published (2009-12-01 07:44:00)
Quoting - tim18 Is this the separately purchased IMSL? It may offer support for 10.0 yet have a good chance of working with 11.1. At the price, I wouldn't blame you for wanting more assurance, yet you could give it a try first. IMSL provides several functions that are not provided by the Math Kernel, such as gamma function, inverse CDF functions. The salesman from VNI (vendor of IMSL) told me that the current IMSL for linux is not...
user's latest post:
Segmentation fault when passing...
Published (2009-12-03 10:45:00)
Quoting - tim18 Unfortunately, if you want to make procedure arguments strictly compatible with f95 and f2003, you must use external procedures. Hi Tim, Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately indeed, but if that's the only way to get the code to run... Best, Grgur
user's latest post:
relocation truncated to fit:...
Published (2009-12-02 08:34:00)
Hi, I recently started a post related with this instruction, about HOW exactly use that instruction because in older versions of the compiler and a linux-based machine it works well. But now, I am working on two Mac OS machines, each one with different versiones of the compilers and I am not able to use -mcmodel. For version 11.1.058 the error message is: "ifort: command line warning #10152: option '-mcmodel medium' not...
user's latest post:
idbc and modules
Published (2009-12-03 10:18:00)
Hi, I decided after a while that using the debugger idbc is not a bad way to debug fortran apps. My trouble is to set breakponts for subprograms from modules. (I could do it in the past and that is very annoying). at the moment I grep for the symbol name in the binary and I set the br on it (works perfect). I would like to go back to my old ways when used to do br mod_name::sub_name Alin
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X::
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-03 14:33:00)
by JimDempseyAtTheCove
what are your run time differences (single thread versis 4 threads)? Jim Demspey -------- Blog: The Parallel Void
www.quickthreadprogramming.com
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-02 16:48:00)
by tim18
This message: grg.f90(36): error #12145: function "DO_SOMETHING" is called as subroutine grg.f90(61): error #12145: function "GET_AM" is called as subroutine seems to be evidence of a compiler bug in current ifort 11.1. Passing an internal procedure as a procedure argument (a fairly popular feature) wasn't permitted in f95 or f2003, and so is rejected by several ...
Started 1 week, 4 days ago (2009-11-30 08:00:00)
by Ronald W. Green (Intel)
Quoting - etmeyer
I am just a scientific programmer, so I hope someone out there with CS knowledge can educate me on a problem I am having. I have a 1000 x 1000 x 1000 array (for this test - in other cases it may need to be different) If I use this code: program test IMPLICIT NONE DOUBLE PRECISION, allocatable :: stupid(:,:,:) DOUBLE PRECISION, ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-03 08:09:00)
by Steve Lionel (Intel)
The forums use a variant of the popular TinyMCE editor which does not include Fortran highlighting. Just use "Plain". I have asked that Fortran be added as an option, but it's a lot of work for not much benefit, in my opinion. -------- Steve
Attaching or including files in a post
Doctor Fortran blog
@DoctorFortran on Twitter...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-02 12:08:00)
by Ronald W. Green (Intel)
Quoting - rreis
Hi I'm playing with RESHAPE to see if it worths the effort to kill some do cicles in one code. I've done a simple test program which compiles and runs with gfortran but segfaults with ifort (11.1). It segfaults doing the reshape. Can someone give me a hand?
integer, parameter :: ni=310, nj=300, nk=128, njd=nj+2 real, dimension(ni,njd...
Started 2 weeks ago (2009-11-27 17:52:00)
by tim18
Is -Infinity a valid result of your analysis? According to search engine queries, Matlab should accept -Inf. So, where you WRITE values which may take this value, you could modify your WRITE along the line of if(x < -huge(x)then write(*,*)'-Inf' else write(*,*)x endif If necessary, you could write(*,*) max(-huge(x),x) so as to replace -Infinity with the closest ...
Started 1 year, 2 months ago (2008-09-15 05:38:00)
by miro_ilias
I have the same problem on amd64, ifort 10.1. Even with recommended flags given above I'm getting this error message....Previously compiled (pgf90 5.2.4) was working well. -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ifort -o csd.x -fpic subseltcc.o csd.o csdsub.o csdvec.o rle.o ...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-02 05:02:00)
by Steve Lionel (Intel)
Marco, You're correct - this does indeed seem to be a bug. I'll let the developers know - thanks. -------- Steve
Attaching or including files in a post
Doctor Fortran blog
@DoctorFortran on Twitter
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-02 04:39:00)
by tim18
Quoting - gera@lenep.uenf.br
Hello, I am triyng to find the compiler ifort 10.0.023, noncomercial version at the intel webpage.
Why not use a current version? You could register your current license key at https://registrationcenter.intel.com to see if it would give you access to the old version if you are so motivated....
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Intel® Fortran Compiler for Linux and Mac OS* X::
Started 1 week, 4 days ago (2009-11-30 08:00:00)
by Ronald W. Green (Intel)
Quoting - etmeyer
I am just a scientific programmer, so I hope someone out there with CS knowledge can educate me on a problem I am having. I have a 1000 x 1000 x 1000 array (for this test - in other cases it may need to be different) If I use this code: program test IMPLICIT NONE DOUBLE PRECISION, allocatable :: stupid(:,:,:) DOUBLE PRECISION, ...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-02 16:48:00)
by tim18
This message: grg.f90(36): error #12145: function "DO_SOMETHING" is called as subroutine grg.f90(61): error #12145: function "GET_AM" is called as subroutine seems to be evidence of a compiler bug in current ifort 11.1. Passing an internal procedure as a procedure argument (a fairly popular feature) wasn't permitted in f95 or f2003, and so is rejected by several ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-03 14:33:00)
by JimDempseyAtTheCove
what are your run time differences (single thread versis 4 threads)? Jim Demspey -------- Blog: The Parallel Void
www.quickthreadprogramming.com
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-03 08:09:00)
by Steve Lionel (Intel)
The forums use a variant of the popular TinyMCE editor which does not include Fortran highlighting. Just use "Plain". I have asked that Fortran be added as an option, but it's a lot of work for not much benefit, in my opinion. -------- Steve
Attaching or including files in a post
Doctor Fortran blog
@DoctorFortran on Twitter...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-02 12:08:00)
by Ronald W. Green (Intel)
Quoting - rreis
Hi I'm playing with RESHAPE to see if it worths the effort to kill some do cicles in one code. I've done a simple test program which compiles and runs with gfortran but segfaults with ifort (11.1). It segfaults doing the reshape. Can someone give me a hand?
integer, parameter :: ni=310, nj=300, nk=128, njd=nj+2 real, dimension(ni,njd...
|
|