ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard on http://www.elsmar.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard, located on the Message Board at http://www.elsmar.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard" on the Message Board at http://www.elsmar.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
35
|
144
|
353
|
|
Post:
|
163
|
630
|
1,571
|
|
|
ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Keeping an External Auditor on...
Published (2008-11-20 13:26:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Icy Mountain I was the real hero when we went from nothing to TS169149 registered in a year. Aaaah, we remember your adventure very well. Stijloor.
user's latest post:
Control of Obsolete Documents -...
Published (2008-11-19 13:52:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by jasonthomas_iso I am in the process of looking for ISO related document management software and need clarification whether or not I must transfer all obsolete document into the newly implemented ISO document software? What do I need to mention in the Management Review Meeting (specifically about document control procedure) in conjunction to the implementation of the document management software? 1. Possibly, it is...
user's latest post:
Summary of Changes - ISO...
Published (2008-11-19 21:34:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by JaneB There's no such thing as a 'forward'. I knew this girl back in 9th grade who... Oh, sorry. Wrong topic...
user's latest post:
Keeping an External Auditor on...
Published (2008-11-20 10:27:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Bifften Any thoughts?! For someone so young, you have tremendous insight. You obviously work for a very dysfunctional organization. Get out of there as soon as you can. While all entities in the World have a degree of dysfunction in their operations, there are some that are able to keep dysfunction in check. Colin said it all. If you "rock the boat", you might go overboard. However, it is clear...
user's latest post:
Keeping an External Auditor on...
Published (2008-11-20 11:26:00)
Phil. In general I agree with the advice from the 'great and the good' here on the cove. I do however recommend a little well-judged boat rocking. Quote: Originally Posted by Bifften My job (process mapping) is intended to be a step in the right direction towards improving the quality system in the company. I spend a few weeks up to a few months in each department documenting processes. Its a mamouth task, progress is good but...
user's latest post:
Non-conformance regarding Lean...
Published (2008-11-18 12:00:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by AndyN It's difficult to get there, from what the CB auditor reported! This is one of the reasons why management see little benefit from CB audits! Happily Sandy, you know what the issue is, but without your interpretation, I rather doubt that anyone else would have drawn the same conclusions! Score? 10 to you, 0 for the Auditor's report! Thanks Andy, but I really have no problem with our auditor. There is...
user's latest post:
Do you need a separate procedure...
Published (2008-11-19 22:37:00)
A single document may address the requirements for one or more procedures. I think that says it all, am I the only one? There is no requirement that they be 6 separate procedures. Only that the process for these 6 things be documented. There is nothing to keep you from combining etc.
user's latest post:
Keeping an External Auditor on...
Published (2008-11-20 06:16:00)
Well Phil, its down to the woods with your trusty revolver I guess Seriously, I am afraid that yours is not an uncommon situation. The auditor gets an easy ride for a couple of days, no real effort involved and the company get to keep their certificate. I don't know the UKAS rules/guidance as well as some but I thought there was something in there about changing the auditor every 3 years or so because the 'go native' after a...
user's latest post:
Measuring Equipment and...
Published (2008-11-20 11:36:00)
BradM: And what is your opinion on the example I gave above? /S.
user's latest post:
IRCA requirements for 9001:2008 CPD
Published (2008-11-19 20:47:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Marc If that's all there is, I don't have a problem with it. I will say that if a specific QMS auditor transition course was required it would be a bit much. Tell me about it
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard::
Started 2 days, 9 hours ago (2008-11-20 12:38:00)
by Bob the QE
If this is a repeat question I appologize in advance, however, my search did not turn up what I was looking for. This could be the way I typed the search request. Anyway, I am working in the AS world now and am quite familar with the clause for CNC Programining and meeting the requirements. However, when I developed ISO systems those companys did not have such equipment so I am not sure how they ...
Started 2 days, 15 hours ago (2008-11-20 06:03:00)
by Bifften
Hello, I have an issue I would like some advice on please... To set the context... I am reasonably new to both the industry and the company (I started a role as a HSQE officer in March - my primary work involves a large business process mapping project encompassing the whole organisation). The company is market leading manufacturer and supplier - German Owner, and I'm at UK head office....
Started 2 days, 9 hours ago (2008-11-20 12:38:00)
by pakis
Hello! I'm Spanish, so to start with sorry for my writing. Now, I'm to introduce my "thread". I'm working in a company who makes buildings. We are implementing a Quality Management System, ISO 9001, in our building sites but I need some advice: we need to inspection each phase of the building sites to know if they are ok or not following the Standards of ISO 9001, do you know any kind of ...
Started 3 days, 13 hours ago (2008-11-19 08:12:00)
by Sandra Feliciano
Does anyone know what is the rationale behind ISO 9001 option for only making mandatory that the measuring equipment be subject to verification and or calibration when valid results are needed? What about the situations where the monitoring equipment also need to present valid results? Why shouldn't it be also subjected to verification? It's nothing new about it on the 2008 version, it ...
Started 5 days, 7 hours ago (2008-11-17 14:31:00)
by Marc
Summary of Changes - ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9001:2008 It is said that the changes in ISO 9001:2008 are primarily clarifications that are intended to provide clarity and thus improve understanding of the existing (ISO 9001:2000) requirements. I also understand most of the changes are for ease of use and improved compatibility with ISO 14001:2004. Details, please. Who wants to start?
Started 3 days, 11 hours ago (2008-11-19 10:18:00)
by Colpart
I have just received the updated requirements for IRCA registered auditors regarding CPD for ISO 9001:2008 http://www.irca.org/news/news_pressrelease43.html It does make the point that auditors must undergo the update process (training etc) before conducting audits to the new standard.
Started 5 days, 14 hours ago (2008-11-17 07:01:00)
by JJ777
This is my first post on a very informative site. I'm also fairly new to the world of ISO. I'm from South Africa and working in the ICT dept of the University of South Africa. We received our certification last year (only within the ICT dept)and we have just completed our second surveillance audit. A question from the auditor to one of the staff member: "What has ISO done for you during the ...
Started 3 days, 3 hours ago (2008-11-19 18:20:00)
by Andrea08
Wondering if anyone can assist me. I am unsure as to whether you need 6 separate mandatory procedures for the following as it states under documented procedures: There are six clauses where the standard requires a documented procedure and they are: 4.2.3 Control of documents (have this) 4.2.4 Control of records (have this) 8.2.2 Internal Audit (have this) 8.3 Control of non ...
Started 3 days, 8 hours ago (2008-11-19 13:38:00)
by jasonthomas_iso
I am in the process of looking for ISO related document management software and need clarification whether or not I must transfer all obsolete document into the newly implemented ISO document software? What do I need to mention in the Management Review Meeting (specifically about document control procedure) in conjunction to the implementation of the document management software?
Started 5 days, 15 hours ago (2008-11-17 06:11:00)
by Jerome
Hello dear Covers , I'm certain there are people out there who've had the same question: Can we (as a supplier) charge people how want to come and audit us? As a manufacturer (35 employees) of devices and software systems for the nuclear medicine, we get more and more requests to come over and audit our quality system or product specific. This becausesome of our clients (mainly ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management Systems Standard::
Started 5 days, 7 hours ago (2008-11-17 14:31:00)
by Marc
Summary of Changes - ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9001:2008 It is said that the changes in ISO 9001:2008 are primarily clarifications that are intended to provide clarity and thus improve understanding of the existing (ISO 9001:2000) requirements. I also understand most of the changes are for ease of use and improved compatibility with ISO 14001:2004. Details, please. Who wants to start?
Started 5 days, 3 hours ago (2008-11-17 17:58:00)
by Sandyd
We recently went through a surveillance audit ( ISO 9001:2000) and received a minor non-conformance: "The Lean Process is not defined within the QMS; application and interaction with other processes is not identified." I agree with the non-conformance as we have no documented process, but am not sure where/how to connect the Lean activities within our QMS. Is continual improvement (8.5.1) ...
Started 5 days, 14 hours ago (2008-11-17 07:01:00)
by JJ777
This is my first post on a very informative site. I'm also fairly new to the world of ISO. I'm from South Africa and working in the ICT dept of the University of South Africa. We received our certification last year (only within the ICT dept)and we have just completed our second surveillance audit. A question from the auditor to one of the staff member: "What has ISO done for you during the ...
Started 2 days, 15 hours ago (2008-11-20 06:03:00)
by Bifften
Hello, I have an issue I would like some advice on please... To set the context... I am reasonably new to both the industry and the company (I started a role as a HSQE officer in March - my primary work involves a large business process mapping project encompassing the whole organisation). The company is market leading manufacturer and supplier - German Owner, and I'm at UK head office....
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2008-11-14 15:36:00)
by fwilsonNY
Title of the thread may be a little vague, but I am not quite sure how to summarize my dilemma in one line. I have been lurking now for a few weeks and learned a lot that has helped me out, but now I am have hit kind of a mental brick wall and have no higher expert on the subject here at work so I figured it couldn't hurt to ask the knowledgeable people here. Just a quick summary of where I am at...
Started 3 days, 3 hours ago (2008-11-19 18:20:00)
by Andrea08
Wondering if anyone can assist me. I am unsure as to whether you need 6 separate mandatory procedures for the following as it states under documented procedures: There are six clauses where the standard requires a documented procedure and they are: 4.2.3 Control of documents (have this) 4.2.4 Control of records (have this) 8.2.2 Internal Audit (have this) 8.3 Control of non ...
Started 5 days, 12 hours ago (2008-11-17 09:12:00)
by viren
Hello Recently we finished our external audit and certified for one more year and today i came to know that 9001:2008 standard was released. I wanted to know that how we have to do the transition to the new standard, are we suppose to go for gap analysis again or the consulting firm will inform us what to do? Is it mandatory to go for the transition or voluntary? thanks and ...
Started 3 days, 13 hours ago (2008-11-19 08:12:00)
by Sandra Feliciano
Does anyone know what is the rationale behind ISO 9001 option for only making mandatory that the measuring equipment be subject to verification and or calibration when valid results are needed? What about the situations where the monitoring equipment also need to present valid results? Why shouldn't it be also subjected to verification? It's nothing new about it on the 2008 version, it ... | |
Size: 541 bytes
