|
More site info...
AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements on http://www.elsmar.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements, located on the Message Board at http://www.elsmar.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements" on the Message Board at http://www.elsmar.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
4
|
41
|
150
|
|
Post:
|
10
|
118
|
447
|
|
|
AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
New OASIS database feature -...
Published (2009-12-02 14:05:00)
Some enhancements to the IAQG OASIS database have been announced: OASIS Modification to Send Feedback Requests to Accreditation Bodies OASIS Change to Add AABs OASIS Modification to Show Certification Exclusions
user's latest post:
New AS9101-The Coordination...
Published (2009-11-27 13:11:00)
I guess that's why the "anti-check list" movement never turned me on. I would start with a check list and by the time I was done I knew their processes, how they interact, and in depth. For example, if a check list says something like: "Verify Document Control System and that it satisfies the requirements of the standard." From that point it was "Show me your procedure", I'd read...
user's latest post:
New AS9101-The Coordination...
Published (2009-11-27 07:26:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Sidney Vianna If the voting passes, we could have the new 9101 document released in all 3 sectors by November 2009. Sidney, Could you please let us know the status on it ? I don't think it is released yet. I just checked IHS website. Regards, Hardik Someshvar
user's latest post:
Customer Audit - C.A.S.E....
Published (2009-12-03 09:25:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by bornapilot As a former CASE Auditor for a Major Carrier for 15 years I am a little confused by some of your terminology. Were you audited by an air carrier or a 145 Repair Station? If it was an air carrier was the auditor a CASE Authorized Auditor. If you are not an FAA approved "Certificated" 145 Repair Station what type of work are you performing? As a side note and in agreement with the other...
user's latest post:
New OASIS database feature -...
Published (2009-12-02 14:16:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Sidney Vianna Tell me about it ! I read your link, Sidney. I posted a reply as well.
user's latest post:
Customer Audit - C.A.S.E....
Published (2009-12-02 17:58:00)
As a former CASE Auditor for a Major Carrier for 15 years I am a little confused by some of your terminology. Were you audited by an air carrier or a 145 Repair Station? If it was an air carrier was the auditor a CASE Authorized Auditor. If you are not an FAA approved "Certificated" 145 Repair Station what type of work are you performing? As a side note and in agreement with the other postings the Standards are different....
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements::
Started 2 weeks, 2 days ago (2009-11-19 10:35:00)
by Sidney Vianna
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCW
How can CARs be written up against a spec that is not flowed down to me?
They can't, unless you accept it.
Since you are in the Aerospace Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul supply chain and you are not certificated by the FAA, typically your quality system should be ...
Started 1 year, 6 months ago (2008-05-30 19:06:00)
by Coury Ferguson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Vianna
News concerning the OASIS database:
Sidney,
The link doesn't seem to be working for me.
Is this the link: http://www.sae.org/iaqgdb/oasishelp/...0080502_V6. pdf
Started 1 year, 5 months ago (2008-06-11 07:05:00)
by DannyK
Thanks for the draft AS9101. I briefly scanned the document and belive that the changes will be embraced by most auditors and customers.
The current checklist is very labor intensive. I usually spend about 2 hours off site preparing the checklist with some of the information is not so important.
The proposed AS9101 hoefully will provide more value-added feedback to the customer....
Started 1 week, 5 days ago (2009-11-23 08:52:00)
by BadgerMan
You need to maintain your rev B certification until you are able to upgrade to rev C.
Started 1 week, 5 days ago (2009-11-23 10:00:00)
by BadgerMan
Awareness of what?
The obvious answer is 6.2.2 but I sense that there is more to your question than meets the eye.
Started 1 year, 7 months ago (2008-04-11 11:38:00)
by Sidney Vianna
Quote:
Originally Posted by intrestedparty
I heard about that, In AS 9100 Rev C, The checklist based audit is not there.
Karthi.T
The AS support checklists, AS9101, 9111 and 9121, are also undergoing a revision process. The revised checklists will likely eliminate the current scoring feature ...
Started 1 week, 5 days ago (2009-11-23 12:25:00)
by cbearden cbearden is offline Involved in Discussions Registration Date: Aug2003 Location: Decatur,
Currently we are ISO9001:2000 and we are going for our AS9100 in spring 2010. I see other companies that are registered to ISO and AS9100....why is this?...We all know that AS9100 is ISO9001 with additional requirements so if you're AS9100 certified, you are automatically compliant to the ISO standard, correct??....I'm just not seeing the reasoning for this but maybe I'm missing something.
...
Started 2 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-11-20 01:31:00)
by anil123
Quote:
Originally Posted by goodnede
Hello everyone, I did a search for this AS clause and didn't have any results. Exactly how is (c) supposed to be interpreted? Is stamping pass or fail on a work order a sufficient record or is it saying, for example, a machined part has 10 dimensions, you should have documentation (an ...
Started 3 weeks, 4 days ago (2009-11-10 12:53:00)
by alspread
Excellent question!!!
It's a chicken and the egg situation. If you're not heat treating, the auditor has nothing to audit. If your not approved, you can heat treat.
In the past, I have received a temporary exclusion from my customer to permit processing pending Nadcap approval. My customer performed their own process audit and wanted to see all of my procedures and a purchase order to ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on AS9100 and other Aerospace Standards and Requirements::
Started 1 year, 5 months ago (2008-06-11 07:05:00)
by DannyK
Thanks for the draft AS9101. I briefly scanned the document and belive that the changes will be embraced by most auditors and customers.
The current checklist is very labor intensive. I usually spend about 2 hours off site preparing the checklist with some of the information is not so important.
The proposed AS9101 hoefully will provide more value-added feedback to the customer....
Started 1 year, 6 months ago (2008-05-30 19:06:00)
by Coury Ferguson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Vianna
News concerning the OASIS database:
Sidney,
The link doesn't seem to be working for me.
Is this the link: http://www.sae.org/iaqgdb/oasishelp/...0080502_V6. pdf
Started 2 weeks, 2 days ago (2009-11-19 10:35:00)
by Sidney Vianna
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCW
How can CARs be written up against a spec that is not flowed down to me?
They can't, unless you accept it.
Since you are in the Aerospace Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul supply chain and you are not certificated by the FAA, typically your quality system should be ...
|
|
Size: 1,382 bytes
