|
More site info...
General Discussions | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for General Discussions on http://typophile.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: General Discussions, located on the Message Board at http://typophile.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "General Discussions" on the Message Board at http://typophile.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on General Discussions:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
175
|
518
|
1,436
|
|
Post:
|
648
|
1,859
|
5,041
|
|
|
General Discussions Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Please! Question about vintage...
Published (2009-11-25 16:08:00)
Are you joking, or serious? Serious. It makes total sense to me. At what point is it no longer copying? It depends. If you’re doing it for commercial purposes you’re probably falling outside of fair use and should err on the side of caution.
user's latest post:
Futurist typography
Published (2009-11-24 17:44:00)
Joe, There were no Futurist typefaces that I know of. Most of the movements of the time did not generate an actual typeface. Making typefaces in those years involved time, money, technical knowledge and therefore a connection to an established foundry. Young avante garde arty folks rarely could put that combination together then. Even the Constructivists did mostly hand lettering or linocuts. Bayer’s work waited years before someone...
user's latest post:
Cloned vs Inspired
Published (2009-11-25 21:44:00)
Pragmatica is not a clone of Helvetica. What would you say then Maxim, more of a miracle—immaculate conception?
user's latest post:
Design Standards
Published (2009-11-24 11:36:00)
One of the great things I love seeing on Typophile is mediocre work (but a good idea) posted in crit (be it a logo or typeface) and then being able to watch it evolve through critique into something (quite often) remarkable.
user's latest post:
Why Rent or Buy, When You Can...
Published (2009-11-23 14:47:00)
@epsilicon I’ve been looking at the source code for Facelift. Thanks for posting this. I’ve become re-interested. Just as the increase in bandwidth has made @font-face a viable proposition so too, might some of these image replacement techniques be worth a second look. Some sites might not want to settle for the fallback font-family. On a well-optimized site the performance hit for this kind of stuff might be acceptable if...
user's latest post:
Futurist typography
Published (2009-11-26 01:01:00)
designed by Bruno Munari, one of the greatest XX century designer One of my favourite quotes from Munari goes something like this: “I’m one of the few persons that can say to have a futurist past”
user's latest post:
Venetian blind font
Published (2009-11-26 10:24:00)
I like the rounded bottoms, but the tops look like he cut the blinds apart.
user's latest post:
Wich "serif" to be...
Published (2009-11-26 14:05:00)
Except in signs, I don’t see Helvetica that often, and I have to admit that in my opinion Helvetica is more attractive than Univers - or Gill Sans; which doubtless exposes my lack of taste. (And my opinion of Times Roman is that it will stick around as long as Caslon did.) But I don’t think that Helvetica and Times Roman go well together (unless they’re very different in size, so the issue of the stylistic clash...
user's latest post:
Wich "serif" to be...
Published (2009-11-26 20:51:00)
Hrant, whom do you imagine that I am ’appeasing’? I have spent time working with the Helvetica design, and I am making comments about the quality of that design based on intimate knowledge of it. And one of the points I have made about Helvetica a number of time, contra your ’homogenized Helveeta’, is that this is actually a quite idiosyncratic design with many oddities of construction, ultimately only...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on General Discussions::
Started 2 days ago (2009-11-26 06:34:00)
by William Berkson
I agree with you that humanist proportions—oval rather than circular—space better and work better for text. However, when there is a smaller x-height, as in Futura, it does seem to help the spacing of geometrics in text. I’m not sure why—maybe it allows looser spacing while still keeping the words together visually as a unit. I’ve been particularly impressed by how Vesta—oval and pretty narrow—...
Started 3 days, 20 hours ago (2009-11-24 10:38:00)
by Maxim Zhukov
Pragmatica is not a clone of Helvetica. Its development was, precisely, inspired by Helvetica.
Started 2 days, 5 hours ago (2009-11-26 02:16:00)
by karinskij
Lovely! Now all I need is an Iphone...
Started 4 days ago (2009-11-24 07:13:00)
by James Puckett
Times New Roman is the perfect face when you need to say “I don’t give a shit and this client will pay late anyway.”
Started 1 day, 20 hours ago (2009-11-26 11:01:00)
by quadibloc
When I heard what the author had to say about the book “The Rule of Four”, I was astonished when he claimed that Hypnerotomachia Poliphilii was this incredibly obscure old book.
In fact, of course, pages from it illustrate many books discussing the history of printing, because, along with De Aetna by Bembo, it illustrates the early roman of Aldus Manutilus.
Another thing about ...
Started 1 day, 3 hours ago (2009-11-27 03:47:00)
by Fontgrube
It might have started with Bembo bold, but there is a lot of tweaking that went into it.
Andreas
Started 3 days, 23 hours ago (2009-11-24 07:51:00)
by James Puckett
I love everything they stood for and everything they produced.
You really need to do some serious reading and rethink that statement. Start with Benito Mussolini’s Wikipedia entry.
Started 2 days, 17 hours ago (2009-11-25 13:31:00)
by James Puckett
Anything pre-1927 has passed into the public domain. After 1927 things get messy depending on what country you’re in, what country the item was created/copyrighted in, and whether or not the copyrights have been renewed over the years. But there’s a nasty catch—reproductions of the images are copyrighted. For example, you can’t just scan a photo out of a book to reproduce without permission; ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on General Discussions::
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 09:09:00)
by James Puckett
We license fonts for print use the way we do because there isn’t a better option. Trying to license fonts on some sort of per-use basis makes business much more complicated, and then means less time drawing letters, which is not something that interests a lot of type designers. But with the web it suddenly becomes much easier to work with a service that charges per-use in some way and cuts ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-20 07:25:00)
by James Puckett
Does anyone read design magazines anymore?
Not since Baseline got so dull that stores dropped it from their magazine racks.
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-19 07:43:00)
by Nick Shinn
Using the graphics card to render type, rather than the CPU: is that how Apple’s Quartz rendering works?
Started 4 days ago (2009-11-24 07:13:00)
by James Puckett
Times New Roman is the perfect face when you need to say “I don’t give a shit and this client will pay late anyway.”
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-20 14:40:00)
by dirtcastle
One issue is that it creates an unintended “penalty” when the designer messes up or needs to revise whatever has been rasterized.
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-17 17:04:00)
by James Puckett
In design school I spent about six months integrating my hand with the handwriting of sixteenth century writing master Jodocus Hondius. Of course that only made it less legible, but whatever.
Started 3 days, 23 hours ago (2009-11-24 07:51:00)
by James Puckett
I love everything they stood for and everything they produced.
You really need to do some serious reading and rethink that statement. Start with Benito Mussolini’s Wikipedia entry.
Started 2 days, 17 hours ago (2009-11-25 13:31:00)
by James Puckett
Anything pre-1927 has passed into the public domain. After 1927 things get messy depending on what country you’re in, what country the item was created/copyrighted in, and whether or not the copyrights have been renewed over the years. But there’s a nasty catch—reproductions of the images are copyrighted. For example, you can’t just scan a photo out of a book to reproduce without permission; ...
Started 4 days, 17 hours ago (2009-11-23 14:21:00)
by EColeman
My local independent bookstore got one of those, and has used it to bring back a bunch of out-of-print books on local history. Pretty cool.
Started 5 days, 22 hours ago (2009-11-22 08:34:00)
by James Puckett
Write a paper about how design academia is infested with dullards incapable of understanding how anything less subtle than Keedy Sans or Dead History can be experimental. The truth is that, aside from the most servile revivals, there’s some degree of experimentation in all type design.
|
|