|
More site info...
|
|
Forum profile page for Routing on http://www.juniper.net.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Routing, located on the Message Board at http://www.juniper.net.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Routing" on the Message Board at http://www.juniper.net is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Routing:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
25
|
105
|
270
|
|
Post:
|
43
|
153
|
439
|
|
|
Routing Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
routing instance with # ospf...
Published (2009-12-27 17:10:00)
Hello Alex the router is on rel. 10: root@RTR # run show version brief Hostname: RTR Model: j4350 JUNOS Software Release [10.0R1.8] when adding instance-type virtual-router en routing-instance ospf10, I can ping local ip (10.10.119.1) but not remote ip (10.10.119.2) I've created a security zone untrust on default vr. Do do i have to create also a security zone for this instance ? root@RTR # show security zones { ...
user's latest post:
BGP fail to establish...
Published (2009-12-23 23:28:00)
Another issue with this router is its CFEB reloaded many times automatically. So far we will not able to upgrade its JUNOS because we have two other E1 uplinks with ISP using static routes and running critical services on IPs routed on these E1. Upgrade to 8.3r2.8 required restart of router more than two times and we can't affoard downtime but we are planning to do this by replacing router with higher JUNOS version. Any way to check...
user's latest post:
BGP fail to establish...
Published (2009-12-23 23:20:00)
Can you give a try to version 8.3R2.8 as it works on your other peering !
user's latest post:
routing instance with # ospf...
Published (2009-12-27 10:29:00)
Are you using JUNOS-ES by any chance? Please run "show version" on your J-series box and post output here. The config I gave you is for regular JUNOS, not JUNOS-ES, see my post dd 23/12/2009 point #3 http://forums.juniper.net/t5/Routing/routing-insta nce-with-ospf-area/m-p/32146#M1859 Rgds Alex
user's latest post:
Question on JSRP - J-Net Community
Published (2009-12-27 03:51:00)
Hi I have two J-4350 routers. I want to configure them in HA using JSRP protocol. I want to ask a question. The simple topology is that LAN SW->Two J-4350 (in HA)-> single WAN link One link from each J-4350 is in redundant group. Say first J-4350 is primary for this redundant group. I have single WAN link which is terminated on first J-4350. Suppose link connected to LAN Switch from first J-4350 down then offcourse link...
user's latest post:
BGP Multihoming - J-Net Community
Published (2009-12-23 18:20:00)
Hai benb thank you for the brief comment. i have delete the default and apply the config to router and my customer still can access internet. -- settle the default route problem. 1. when i do trace route i see all traffic still in/out to Upstream A. Upstream B confirm link up and BGP establish and i can see advertised/receive route from them. 2. Upstream A is a international peering partner and Upstream B is a domestic peering...
user's latest post:
Interconnecting 2 virtual...
Published (2009-12-26 00:03:00)
Hi, You are right but in the M series u can do in fxp... so wat is the command in the E series
user's latest post:
Foating static route? - J-Net...
Published (2009-12-27 00:07:00)
Hi, You can give indivisual preference for the same destination (in this case, 0/0 ) by using the keyword "qualified-next-hop" So, basically ur config shld be something like set routing-options static route 0/0 next-hop 1.1.1.1 <next hop IP for ISP-A> set routing-options static route 0/0 qualified-next-hop 2.2.2.1 preference 25 <next hop IP for ISP-B> Hope this helps DP
user's latest post:
BGP Multihoming - J-Net Community
Published (2009-12-23 08:56:00)
Correct. You should remove the default route. You should have no problem connecting to your peer without it. Assuming your bgp neighbors are directly connected. A few guidelines regarding your policies. 1. If you do choose to block unallocated space, as you are doing in the 'bogon-update' term, then you must have a method to dynamically update those route-filters. If you don't the ability to script that change, or...
user's latest post:
L2TP on ERX1440 configuration...
Published (2009-12-24 10:21:00)
Hi, Have you already solved the issue? If not, I think you have to make LNS as DHCPv6 server and use prefix delegation to allocate IPv6 prefix. LNS becomes DHCPv6 server and cpe becomes DHCPv6 client. If LNS has delegated IPv6 prefix to the cpe, you can observe by executing show ipv6 dhcpv6-local binding on LNS. Monitoring DHCPv6 Local Server Binding Information - JUNOSe 9.3.x Broadband Access Configuration Guide...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Routing::
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-12-19 13:01:00)
by aarseniev
Hello there, Filtering between OSPF areas is supported since very early JUNOS days http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/in formation-products/topic-collections/config-guide- routing/routing-summarizing-ranges-of-routes-in-os pf- link-state-advertisements.html What you probably need is "set protocols ospf area XYZ area-range <net>/<mask> restrict" to stop route propagation between ...
Started 3 days, 4 hours ago (2009-12-27 00:07:00)
by DP
Hi, You can give indivisual preference for the same destination (in this case, 0/0 ) by using the keyword "qualified-next-hop" So, basically ur config shld be something like set routing-options static route 0/0 next-hop 1.1.1.1 <next hop IP for ISP-A> set routing-options static route 0/0 qualified-next-hop 2.2.2.1 preference 25 <next hop IP for ISP-B> Hope this helps ...
Started 4 days, 14 hours ago (2009-12-25 14:15:00)
by meigloo
from what i heard these day(same probl here, i study for jncia-m,jncis-m).. you can do that via FXP interfaces , assing lets say FXP1.2 to R1 and FXP2.3 to R2..same subnet..same vlan-id.. you also need a vlan capable sw .. i hope it helped... waiting for others oppinions
Started 4 days, 18 hours ago (2009-12-25 10:20:00)
by diskace
Finally we had a reply from a Juniper engineer. That SRP cannot be upgraded. We need to get a newer SRP. Thank you.
Started 4 months, 2 weeks ago (2009-08-12 10:58:00)
by shinyviolet
Furthermore, can ERX1440 be LNS for more than one LACs? What about this kind of configuration? Anything need to notice? Thank you!
Started 5 days, 18 hours ago (2009-12-24 10:06:00)
by tnakajim
Hi, I think its time for troubleshooting! You should think why subscribers can't access to the internet. -Is all the subscribers can't access to the internet? -Why did you think E320 has having trouble? Did the device generate error message or indicate having trouble? Is nothing wrong with other devices which are connected to E320? -What is the log which you attached? Regards, ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-21 23:48:00)
by Loup2
Hi, Are you using different software versions on the two M7i. Your multihop option with ttl 1 shoudn't be usefull. I think you can add a trace to see why bgp is going down. just add this and have a look at the tracesafter the peering goes down: User @M7i # show protocols bgp traceoptions file BGP_Trace; flag open detail; Also compare the bgp status after the ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Routing::
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-12-21 23:48:00)
by Loup2
Hi, Are you using different software versions on the two M7i. Your multihop option with ttl 1 shoudn't be usefull. I think you can add a trace to see why bgp is going down. just add this and have a look at the tracesafter the peering goes down: User @M7i # show protocols bgp traceoptions file BGP_Trace; flag open detail; Also compare the bgp status after the ...
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-12-19 13:01:00)
by aarseniev
Hello there, Filtering between OSPF areas is supported since very early JUNOS days http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/in formation-products/topic-collections/config-guide- routing/routing-summarizing-ranges-of-routes-in-os pf- link-state-advertisements.html What you probably need is "set protocols ospf area XYZ area-range <net>/<mask> restrict" to stop route propagation between ...
Started 1 week ago (2009-12-22 10:58:00)
by benb
1. Yes. 2. Only if you need to do something different, with respect to importing and exporting routes. For example, you might wish to set local preference higher on routes received from one provider vs. the other. 3. I would recommend *not* using default routes. One of the benefits of BGP is that routing is dynamic. If you wish to have a default route to your provider, you should ask your ...
Started 3 days, 4 hours ago (2009-12-27 00:07:00)
by DP
Hi, You can give indivisual preference for the same destination (in this case, 0/0 ) by using the keyword "qualified-next-hop" So, basically ur config shld be something like set routing-options static route 0/0 next-hop 1.1.1.1 <next hop IP for ISP-A> set routing-options static route 0/0 qualified-next-hop 2.2.2.1 preference 25 <next hop IP for ISP-B> Hope this helps ...
Started 4 days, 14 hours ago (2009-12-25 14:15:00)
by meigloo
from what i heard these day(same probl here, i study for jncia-m,jncis-m).. you can do that via FXP interfaces , assing lets say FXP1.2 to R1 and FXP2.3 to R2..same subnet..same vlan-id.. you also need a vlan capable sw .. i hope it helped... waiting for others oppinions
Started 5 days, 18 hours ago (2009-12-24 10:06:00)
by tnakajim
Hi, I think its time for troubleshooting! You should think why subscribers can't access to the internet. -Is all the subscribers can't access to the internet? -Why did you think E320 has having trouble? Did the device generate error message or indicate having trouble? Is nothing wrong with other devices which are connected to E320? -What is the log which you attached? Regards, ...
Started 4 months, 2 weeks ago (2009-08-12 10:58:00)
by shinyviolet
Furthermore, can ERX1440 be LNS for more than one LACs? What about this kind of configuration? Anything need to notice? Thank you!
Started 1 month ago (2009-11-30 01:55:00)
by Screenie
Can you show the interface config, routing options from the config and a show int detail on the two interface? Hide/change IP addresses if you don't want to share public addresses.
Started 4 days, 18 hours ago (2009-12-25 10:20:00)
by diskace
Finally we had a reply from a Juniper engineer. That SRP cannot be upgraded. We need to get a newer SRP. Thank you.
|
|