Sigma SLR Talk | Forum profile

Yeah, right:) Nice pictures but those people didn't move. They were posing for you :)

I started commenting on the images, but they're all so good, I thought I should be quiet and post something for better or worse. Honestly, this whole group of images are better than in a lot of challenges

Cheers,

Sigma's built-in flash is well known for being unreliable without first sending it back to Sigma repair for calibration--and that's with Sigma's own lenses. So you shouldn't be surprised if it's even worse with an M42 lens. In other words, what you're experiencing is "normal" for the SD14.

As far as city lights, you are correct. I do not mean high ISO. I mean base ISO on a tripod. And of course, with long exposure Nikon becomes better again. But somewhere in between Foveon is good. I think this has to do with extreme contrast which are easier to render without extrapolation. By the way, I did this direct head to head with DP2 and EP1. So I am not really saying that you "should" use SD14, but perhaps it would be...

could be my eyes not reading it correctly but It looks like OS on the back...

There is a mark on MF dial between 2m and 5m marks on DP2 - what is the focusing distance for that mark ?

The same to you Adam. Nice shot, but your pine needles look a little flatten. Must be lens distortion. Is that Ma in the chair in the background? Give her a Christmas hug for me. JohnW

I've figured something out. I really like the style of the photographers who buy DP cameras. Keep up the great work.

Thanks, Tony, for this information. tonekurv wrote: > Hi all. Richard F. alerted me to this discussion re: Lumix conversion lenses on the DP1. I don't have a copy of the 52mm version of the Lumix lens, but I do have the 46mm. I will try and post some samples on our website in the next couple weeks comparing the Lumix, Nikon, and Ricoh converters. > > Meanwhile, maybe I can help by at least supplying some dimensions...