Olympus SLR Talk | Forum profile

Sergey_Green wrote: > Rriley wrote: > > well heres one right here > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=33843131 > > > > as to what you claim to remember > > quite a memory for someone joining here 4 Oct 09 > > > > thats another mistake > > Now I remember this post! Incidentally I clicked on...

holy_oly wrote: > like the PP effect. can you share what it is? 99% Lightroom Extreme. > > glad you are liking the combo. how does the E-620 with small grip feel after E-1's 'fit the hand like a glove' fit? Its a great camera with fantastic IQ and features in a diminutive size but I had to give it up for E-30. The latter just felt right in my hands. I rather like it with the grip. without the grip it would...

Rusty Rusty Yett wrote: > G'day again, John > John King wrote: > > > IF you actually followed the input that Riley and others have into this and other fora, you would realise that his posts are almost always making a positive contribution to the knowledge base and information here, or helping someone and the like. > > > > Unlike you and me, he is not always perfectly correct...

billyy wrote: > really? > I want to shoot myself in the head. > f-number is the focal length divided by the "effective" aperture diameter. > Is this really that hard to understand? it says f stop is focal length divided by DIAMETER. > Not field of view divided by diameter, which is what brightcolours did. > > a 100mm *focal length* lens on 4/3rds body has a *FIELD OF VIEW* of 200mm on...

The emphasis here is not on the stained glass, but on the elaborate wall paintings, mostly ceramic tiles in complex patterns : http://roelh.zenfolio.com/img/v7/p866054776-5.jpg (Istanbul, one of the Sultanic mausoleums leaning against Hagia Sophia).

Yes, I meant the E-3. Just mistyped. Thank you for catching that. Unfortunately, the time alloted for editing the post has expired so I can't correct it directly.

Take a look of the dxomark comparisons. Nikon rules, canon is nowhere near. A bit different in real world performance.

Hollander wrote: > Thank you Am, this was processed in Silver Efex Pro. > -- BTW were is the bl@@dy heron? :) Am.

It's almost like iso 200 has a mild grad filter on all the time. I don't notice noise much at all in shots like this. The smooth grays of the sky or water is different. As with an actual grad filters, increasing foreground brightness doesn't always make the photo look better. In this one I also boosted the foreground a bit with Lightroom's grad filter, and used a dng profile based on jpeg output (I used that profile with...

jerry1983ww wrote: > I am not against spending money on something that will better my photos. I think you have tried coming off a little harsh. I have never once gotten smart with you and really enjoy looking at your work. I just really have to spend wisely now a days. I'm not sure what about my question came across as harsh to you, I'm a little surprised and confused. I've always appreciated your comments and I'm...