Nikon D300/D200/D100 | Forum profile

RomanJohnston wrote: > Dez's work seems as good or better..... > > What made them focus (ahem) on Wandy instead of one of the other > qualified shooters? > > Roman LOL, thanks for the compliment Roman. I guess because I shoot with a D300?! :P Picking a qualified photographer from our Nikon forums is an excellent idea for their marketing campaign. Hear that Nikon? Actually Wandy's shots...

> tolerate the image contributions made by others Where did I say I have any problem with pictures posted? You seem to have a lot of problems with reading too far into comments written. > Seriously we are done this time. So be it. Interestingly, you spent so much time claiming to be interested in worthwhile discussion, yet you didn't spend any time in any of your responses actually debating the topic you started. I gave you...

http://www.johnshawphoto.com/tips/presentation_frame.html - sorry -- http://www.amacherphotography.com

egrivel wrote: > > > Right. All else equal, the d300 will have more pixels on that front > > door. > > But, all else is not equal in the OP's question.   Yes, I think I finally figured that out and edited my post accordingly. It's pretty much the same difference as there is between 35mm, MF and LF film. :-) -- my gallery of so-so photos...

Actually, the whole thing start with 'light painting' with a new colored flashlight he got from school. But honestly,those pictures show just how messy my house is, so I'm not posting them ;) -- Everything I write is a personal opinion. Even when I quote facts, they are the facts I personally choose to accept. http://www.pbase.com/mariog

Hello, Anyone using a Sigma EF 500 DG with their D300 ? Do you like the results? Are they as the SB-600 ? Any glitches with a D300 when set as slave where it wouldn't start in manual mode or anything like that? Thank you in advance! -- Word and Ideas CAN change the world.

It might make sense to run it through a few tests. If you secure the camera and lens to a tripod and carefully focus on something (such as some books, newspaper print, a brick wall, etc.), you can then test the sharpness at various apretures. It it isn't sharp under these conditions, you probably have a problem. Glenn BWhite wrote: > I'm begining to think the lens isn't OK. > I wasn't sure if it was my...

I still have strobes from the 1970's that work. Doubt you'd take enough frames with the flash to EVER wear it out. -- There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. - Ansel Adams

Thanks a lot! Controlling this physical flow instability is very difficult and the onset of droplets never took place where I wanted it to be. So I reduced the water supply as much as possible but such that there was still a constant stream coming out of the faucet. Then I simply knocked on the faucet. This disturbance nicely triggered the onset of turbulence. Cheers, Torsten -- http://nephilim.smugmug.com

Ghislain Leduc wrote: > I can use my D70 at 2.8 and shoot with my flash at 1/1000 but with my > D300, I cannot go higher (faster speed ) than 1/250 or I will see the > curtain.... are you using a radio link to trigger your flash? and aperture fo the most part controls light for flashes not shutter speed unless you have a slow flash which is what happens when you decrease the output power honestly, decreasing the output for...