Google Web Search | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for Google Web Search on http://www.searchenginewatch.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: Google Web Search , located on the Message Board at http://www.searchenginewatch.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "Google Web Search " on the Message Board at http://www.searchenginewatch.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on Google Web Search :
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
6
|
42
|
214
|
|
Post:
|
12
|
105
|
461
|
|
|
Google Web Search Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Google Algorithm Update Oct 2008
Published (2008-11-13 02:51:00)
means Inbound Link or Backlink Quote: Originally Posted by bradbox What is IBL?
user's latest post:
is My website in GOogle Sand Box
Published (2008-11-13 11:51:00)
Let's first try to determine what we mean when we talk about Google's "sandbox." A couple of years ago or so some folks started to notice that it took much longer for new sites to rank -- and stick in the rankings -- then it previously did. After what appeared to be almost a predetermined time, the sites would mysteriously pop up in the search results and stay there as expected. People started to refer to this as...
user's latest post:
Google Algorithm Update Oct 2008
Published (2008-11-13 03:51:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by jag means Inbound Link or Backlink I see, so back links are IBL... Maybe there was another google dance?
user's latest post:
To create a sitemap.xml or not?
Published (2008-11-16 09:43:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by Feydakin Let's say you build the sitemap.. Then 6 months or a year later you change some filenames for whatever reason.. But, as most people will do, you don't get around to updating the sitemap right away, or ever.. Now Google will be looking for that old page and returning a 404 error for it.. I always recommend that if you do build a sitemap, you produce it dynamically. Try to hard code as little as...
user's latest post:
To create a sitemap.xml or not?
Published (2008-11-16 09:43:00)
I'm going to disagree with John.. As this site shows, a properly built internal navigation system is all that you need.. The sitemap.xml does not promise that those pages will be indexed and can introduce the potential for errors in your crawl rate.. Let's say you build the sitemap.. Then 6 months or a year later you change some filenames for whatever reason.. But, as most people will do, you don't get around to updating the...
user's latest post:
Google reports incorrect title...
Published (2008-11-18 02:22:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by jimbeetle The first thing I would do is a thorough check of the site for the misspelling. Next, and maybe the more likely culprit, check the anchor text of your backlinks. Just a suspicion, but one or more of your more powerful backlinks might be malformed, e.g., " xxxx Financia l". Note the unlinked "l". Hi, thanks for getting back to me. I can't see a typo on the site. How...
user's latest post:
To create a sitemap.xml or not?
Published (2008-11-19 17:08:00)
I agree with Fey, build your site properly, and the XML file will be useless. Try to remember why the search engines created the XML site map format. They had webmasters that were complaining that there was no way for them to provide the engines a way to find all the pages on their massive dynamic web sites. So the engines came out with this tool for those webmasters. It's for the sites that are not search engine friendly. If your site...
user's latest post:
To create a sitemap.xml or not?
Published (2008-11-19 21:08:00)
What do you guys suggest if a lot of content is hidden behind a search box. I usually create a sitemap as well as in case feasible, try to create crawlable pages for search engines
user's latest post:
To create a sitemap.xml or not?
Published (2008-11-19 17:08:00)
A site map will not surpass a well-built site in the case of getting it indexed. I still consider it part of good SEO practice. I don't know how much things have changed since when I first started using them, but things seemed to get crawled faster past the first few tiers of the site with the XML sitemap as without... and as far as updating it: http://www.xml-sitemaps.com/ Just run it occasionally to be sure it's up to date if you...
user's latest post:
To create a sitemap.xml or not?
Published (2008-11-19 17:08:00)
I think make a sitemap is good,always a sitemap could help search engine crawl your web faster than have not .
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on Google Web Search ::
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-11 21:58:00)
by JohnW
It's good idea, even if only for diagnostic purposes. Plus, it only takes a few minutes to take care of so I wouldn't worry about the cost, it should be considered part of normal best-practices.
Started 3 days, 15 hours ago (2008-11-18 02:22:00)
by bigjohnjohn
Quote: Originally Posted by jimbeetle The first thing I would do is a thorough check of the site for the misspelling. Next, and maybe the more likely culprit, check the anchor text of your backlinks. Just a suspicion, but one or more of your more powerful backlinks might be malformed, e.g., " xxxx Financia l". Note the unlinked "l"....
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2008-11-12 20:51:00)
by stephen86
arh.. i found one of my website indexed page in google drop dramasticly.But it is no problem in yahoo. Is my website in google sand box?May i know what is the possible reason cause a site in google sand box?Need you all advice . THanks! Below, I attached some statistics for your infomation. First column is date of record , second is number of links in yahoo site explorer and third is indexed ...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-11 21:56:00)
by jimbeetle
There was a lot of stuff that started to get noticed around Friday or so. Over at WmW Matt Cutts chimed in: Quote: I don't consider those rankings indicative of anything coming in the future. Some data went into the index without all of our quality signals incorporated, and it should be mostly back to normal and continuing to get back to normal over the course of...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-11 21:56:00)
by beu
You might try using that text in an image with no ALT text. Why do you see this text as a problem?
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-11 21:57:00)
by jimbeetle
Well, I couldn't find the Google reference to 1,000 URLs, but as it follows the protocol it should accept the 50,000 maximum. Sitemaps.org FAQ : Quote: Sitemaps should be no larger than 10MB (10,485,760 bytes) and can contain a maximum of 50,000 URLs.
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2008-10-02 08:39:53)
by thedevnull
I put up a whole bunch of my website/product pictures and they don't seem to be showing up in google. I had a few questions that maybe some of you SEO masters could help with. Here is what I have done: I added the images to directory with index.html page in it so its in sitemap. Added Alt text Image names are descriptive and SEO'd Added descriptive achor text. Turned on ...
Started 2 months ago (2008-09-16 04:36:59)
by delhiseo
Hi All, Need your help for following problem - My website home page index is missing from google index.When i try to check website with site:topmexicorealestate .com it show me some internal pages with listing of home page. But if i type the URL topmexicorealestate .com in Google it show the home page with google "similar page" option. website is topmexicorealestate .com I did ...
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2008-10-08 14:04:41)
by goodmorningsky
Hello all. My web site is written by php. Most of pages are accessed by query string variables just like this forum site. for example http://www.mysite.com/view.php?id=100 id variable changes from 1 to 1000, or no limit. And site contents varies based on query string. When I generate sitemap from auto generating tools on the web, it writes like http://www....
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2008-10-09 18:15:06)
by jimbeetle
Google was a predictable little search engine when it was a toddler. It loved content and it loved links. It really, really loved links. As it grew it introduced other factors over the years. Whether you call them the "yo-yos" or the "wobblies," search positions are impossible to predict. G has introduced (or might have introduced, or we surmise they might have introduced, or it's all just plain...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on Google Web Search ::
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-11 21:58:00)
by JohnW
It's good idea, even if only for diagnostic purposes. Plus, it only takes a few minutes to take care of so I wouldn't worry about the cost, it should be considered part of normal best-practices.
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2008-11-12 20:51:00)
by stephen86
arh.. i found one of my website indexed page in google drop dramasticly.But it is no problem in yahoo. Is my website in google sand box?May i know what is the possible reason cause a site in google sand box?Need you all advice . THanks! Below, I attached some statistics for your infomation. First column is date of record , second is number of links in yahoo site explorer and third is indexed ...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-11-11 21:56:00)
by jimbeetle
There was a lot of stuff that started to get noticed around Friday or so. Over at WmW Matt Cutts chimed in: Quote: I don't consider those rankings indicative of anything coming in the future. Some data went into the index without all of our quality signals incorporated, and it should be mostly back to normal and continuing to get back to normal over the course of...
Started 3 days, 15 hours ago (2008-11-18 02:22:00)
by bigjohnjohn
Quote: Originally Posted by jimbeetle The first thing I would do is a thorough check of the site for the misspelling. Next, and maybe the more likely culprit, check the anchor text of your backlinks. Just a suspicion, but one or more of your more powerful backlinks might be malformed, e.g., " xxxx Financia l". Note the unlinked "l"....
|
|
Size: 194 bytes
