Environment | Forum profile

i) The IPCC has nothing to do with the CRU "scandal" ii) SO you want a review of the climate science by someone who is not a climate scientist? this makes sense to you ... how?

Why can't Greenfyre understand that this pathetic constant spamming of man-made global warming activist website links doesn't count as evidence of anything but the existence of man-made global warming activist websites?

just a blunt lie. he is the 'mysterious clown' troll-type. - we learned all these blur techniques at our highschool even peer-reviewed by observing new kids in kindergarten. on young kids a sign of social competence, later a sign of ☝

Never let a good ad hominem attack go to waste! /s Whatever anyone wants to say about his background, he has at least as much authority as Al Gore (who has a degree in Political Science)

No, the raw data has not been "cooked." Let me guess, you're going to claim that NASA is in on the conspiracy, too? I think your tinfoil hat is adjusted too tight. Leave science to those who understand it.

@drunkgeologist: From Ask.com: "Oil was formed from the remains of animals and plants that lived millions of years ago in a marine environment." Though not necessarily 'dinosaurs' but not explicitly excluding them either. Problem is that with the AGW fiasco most scientific findings (like Abiogenic oil) will have to be vetted over and over. The extent of the fraud in AGW is just staggering. Now we have to consider...

Johnnick, the notion that we should destroy the world's economy based on opinions of the "experts" is ludicrous. A scientist should not get any louder voice in determining policy than a plumber or garbage man. If the scientists think they have spotted a problem, then it is up to them to persuade us with the TRUTH. Hiding, destroying & tampering with data is NOT the way to do things. You warmers have been caught...

I generally agree with most of the posters that opine that solar panels are ugly--the "standard" ones are not as attractive as they could be. And while the translucent ones are (IMO) very attractive they're also VERY VERY expensive--and solar panels frankly aren't all that cheap to begin with. On the other hand, at least in Colorado homeowners don't have to fight their HOAs over this kind of nonsense. We passed...

@BullBearMS I spent a sizeable amount of time arguing the science with you and shot down all of your evidence and yet you still argue. Would you like to have another scientific discussion?

You have ignored the question repeatedly, you prefer to spew spam. I'm sorry but your spam "evidence" does more to convince me of the lack of credibility that the scientific community has on this issue than it does to convince me. There's simply no contradicting the fact that cloud cover reflects sunlight.