|
More site info...
|
|
Forum profile page for 9/11 on http://www.davidicke.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: 9/11, located on the Message Board at http://www.davidicke.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "9/11" on the Message Board at http://www.davidicke.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on 9/11:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
37
|
163
|
489
|
|
Post:
|
168
|
961
|
2,402
|
|
|
9/11 Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
Planehugger logic.
Published (2009-11-10 07:58:00)
Quote: But on 911 the plane could easily carry the EXTRA load of cutting a hole in a steel tube wall. There's your belief. And i don't buy it. No, that isn't my belief. My belief is that it's a question of how much mass is impacting per unit time, the momentum of that mass at impact, with material strength as a possible aggravating factor but in this case not a necessary factor.
user's latest post:
9/11 Conspiracy Dubunking - Page...
Published (2009-11-10 19:30:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by triforcharity Your time is wrong. http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%...se%20Final.pdf Slide 26 http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTA...ic_comment.pdf http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/f...qa_082108.html So, you were saying?? It says 40% longer than total freefall. Why do you handwave it away??? Because it debunks your BS theories?? I don't handwave it at all. Neither does anyone else with half a brain. Look...
user's latest post:
Planehugger logic.
Published (2009-11-09 08:42:00)
One of the pilots in that thread tries to use the Sherlock Holmes method but he can't quite grasp the difference between "impossible" and "improbable" or the logical implication of a story being a lie from start to finish. Quote: We know that all the official offices were lying from beginning to end. The only appreciable truth that I've discovered, so far, is that the two airplanes hit the tower...
user's latest post:
9/11 Conspiracy Dubunking - Page...
Published (2009-11-04 03:53:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by deem Warning! warning! SCHILL! know one when i see one G man. Yep, you are absolutely right. Triforcharity is an utter shill, a willing participant in disinformation spreading and gatekeeping. Triforcharity has yet to disprove anything I've presented as evidence, or rebuke it, yet continues to try and attack me personally because that's the only way to attempt to discredit my replies.
user's latest post:
Technologies that 9/11 research...
Published (2009-11-10 18:48:00)
So, you are saying that I didn't see those people dying?? That I didn't see the parts of dead bodies in the streets?? Or that my friends Andrew Brunn, Vincent Halloran, or Sean Tallon, or Gregg Atlas DIDN'T EXIST, and are STILL alive?? Holy shit your disgusting.
user's latest post:
Technologies that 9/11 research...
Published (2009-11-10 19:08:00)
triforcharity, whilst I'm in no way condoning such nonsense as suggestions that victim lists were invented it has become quite evident that arguing with people on this forum is getting you stressed out and infuriated. I doubt it would shock you if I said your efforts here day-in day-out fall on deaf ears so why not stick to places like Jref and take a break from these forums.
user's latest post:
Flight 93 & WTC 7 - Page 2 -...
Published (2009-11-03 21:12:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by bryan Whatever it was, it wasn't a plane. Oh Bryan! You have been duped by the dis-informationists. Anyway I see many other topics where you can talk about your no plane theories.
user's latest post:
9/11 Conspiracy Dubunking - Page...
Published (2009-11-10 21:31:00)
If there really is nothing to hide then why doesn't the U.S secret service release the footage of the missile/sorry aeroplane crashing into the pentagon. Why no rebuttal of the conspiracy "nuts?". Imagine the enormous public relations value in its release. At one fell swoop silencing the critics or at least going a long way towards that. No release of footage= something to hide, and we know what.
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on 9/11::
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-09-22 22:33:00)
by leviathanstaar
136 eyewitness's.
Many of which have now stated on video opinions showing what the government claims cannot be possible.
Often times these so called debunkers are simply parroting little niblets that sounded great 6 years ago and are baseless.
Started 2 days, 2 hours ago (2009-11-10 16:58:00)
by bobbydiva
I believe that will be 9pm UK time folks.
Started 4 weeks ago (2009-10-15 10:37:00)
by liltroofer
Well, I am sorry this thread has turned into another argument.
I agree that name-calling and immature discussion doesn't really do much, fan of truth. I've also noticed that asking questions that other people don't ask gets one of two responses:
1. party-line fringe answers under partially exaggerated prosecution (i.e.; Alex Jones crowd)
2. any other topic except answering the ...
Started 4 months, 1 week ago (2009-07-08 09:57:00)
by titan
7/7 Was for Queen Elizabeth's Jubilee
http://www.oneballradio.com/node/808
http://theherald.co.uk/news/news/dis...led_to_hono ur_ 77 _bombing_victims.php
Families of the 52 people killed in the July 7 bombings marked the fourth anniversary of the atrocities by unveiling a commemorative plaque in ...
Started 3 days, 10 hours ago (2009-11-09 08:42:00)
by bryan
One of the pilots in that thread tries to use the Sherlock Holmes method but he can't quite grasp the difference between "impossible" and "improbable" or the logical implication of a story being a lie from start to finish.
Quote:
We know that all the official offices were lying from beginning to end. The only appreciable truth that I've discovered, ...
Started 2 days, 13 hours ago (2009-11-10 05:54:00)
by heartysoup
great interview. thanks for posting.
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-03 12:43:00)
by mr_pixie
On March 16, 2007 NIST logged the receipt of a Request for Correction (RFC) to their WTC reports by Dr. Judy Wood. This RFC sets out the evidence of 1 or more Directed Energy Weapons being used to destroy most or all of the WTC Complex.
On April 12 2007, NIST logged the receipt of a Request for Correction (RFC) to their WTC reports by Dr. Dr Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and ...
|
|
Hot threads for last week on 9/11::
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-09-22 22:33:00)
by leviathanstaar
136 eyewitness's.
Many of which have now stated on video opinions showing what the government claims cannot be possible.
Often times these so called debunkers are simply parroting little niblets that sounded great 6 years ago and are baseless.
Started 4 weeks ago (2009-10-15 10:37:00)
by liltroofer
Well, I am sorry this thread has turned into another argument.
I agree that name-calling and immature discussion doesn't really do much, fan of truth. I've also noticed that asking questions that other people don't ask gets one of two responses:
1. party-line fringe answers under partially exaggerated prosecution (i.e.; Alex Jones crowd)
2. any other topic except answering the ...
Started 3 weeks, 5 days ago (2009-10-17 03:10:00)
by supertzar
If that really happened to you I am sorry. I have heard other people talk about things like that happening to them. When I first started hearing about it I thought it sounded like science fiction, too. Now I tend to think it is probably all too real.
I am not sure about the Led Zep/9-11 connection. I'd have to see the video you are talking about. Their label was called Swan Song, by the...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-11-03 12:43:00)
by mr_pixie
On March 16, 2007 NIST logged the receipt of a Request for Correction (RFC) to their WTC reports by Dr. Judy Wood. This RFC sets out the evidence of 1 or more Directed Energy Weapons being used to destroy most or all of the WTC Complex.
On April 12 2007, NIST logged the receipt of a Request for Correction (RFC) to their WTC reports by Dr. Dr Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and ...
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2009-11-01 20:12:00)
by fanoftruth
"I wonder whether the 'conspiracy theory' of an inside job would have been so prevalent today if Flight 93 had indeed hit its target assuming this theory is correct." - Flip Side
That is a very interesting thought!
I don't live in the US so my geographical knowledge of the country is poor at best but does this theory have any basis in a geographical sense? I suppose what I'm essentially...
Started 3 weeks, 6 days ago (2009-10-16 18:47:00)
by christophera
Quote:
Originally Posted by karma_amputee
I've made my point abundantly clear in my posts, little need to rehash but oh what the hell, that's kinda the point isn't? That people like me will forever need to challenge the buffoons who would dare to suggest with a straight face that no planes struck the WTC on 9/11; that ...
Started 3 days, 10 hours ago (2009-11-09 08:42:00)
by bryan
One of the pilots in that thread tries to use the Sherlock Holmes method but he can't quite grasp the difference between "impossible" and "improbable" or the logical implication of a story being a lie from start to finish.
Quote:
We know that all the official offices were lying from beginning to end. The only appreciable truth that I've discovered, ...
Started 2 days, 2 hours ago (2009-11-10 16:58:00)
by bobbydiva
I believe that will be 9pm UK time folks.
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-04 01:02:00)
by dusthead
Witness the horror of Kurt Russell's spandex trousers.
Started 3 days, 23 hours ago (2009-11-08 19:53:00)
by chris87
|
|