The Soapbox - off-topic rants | Forum profile

The idea is that the vaccine will kill it in it's current form, so it doesn't infect enough people for it to get a chance to mutate. I agree, I think it's probably a storm in a teacup, but I don't think that vaccinations are being pushed on us when they are regarded as unsafe, not to make us autistic and not to kill us.

Christian Graus wrote: brain structure. Which is adversely effected by mercury and other toxins. I suggest you do your research and stop spouting ignorant tobacco science. The government is trying to push an agenda with their relentless fear-mongering and dangerous vaccines backed by tobacco science. Anyone who questions their criminally illegitimate science and dangerous behavior deserves some respect.

HAH, you know nothing of New York. Note I didn't say the city. But again, your narrow and shallow knowledge bites you. Of course, back in the revolution my family wasn't from anywhere around here, so even if that was actually true(which it isn't), I wouldn't particularly care. But back before the US engaged in genocide to settle the random chunk of land you live on, NY was a colony, one of the first, a battlefield for much...

We did this topic last week, what else ya got?

Christian Graus wrote: I'm betting he used it because he saw it on a webpage and actually didn't know what it meant. Perhaps not, I got it from one of those science journals that would have Henize standing on his head trying to comprehend. It really is a proper academic article, not that you-know-who would recognize. Henize might offer you a made up bit of rubbish, but not what I submit - it is verified by peers etc - see my post...

If I was a Microsoft MVP, I would have just reported Vista itself as a bug. Then they could reply "Fixed: Windows 7" Anyway, you guys are funny... Keep it up. Chris, +5 for keeping the high ground. CSS, -3 for multiple unsuccessful redirects, and -2 more for not understanding (Or looking up) the concept of a straw man [ ^ ] in the context of debates.

CaptainSeeSharp wrote: Again, why would they want to be partisan? What purpose would that serve? I'm surprised you still can see it. Think about it some more.

CaptainSeeSharp wrote: Here, you can follow the links from there. References to scientific literature are scattered throughout her documents.[^] This lady, while perhaps well educated, is not a medical practitioner; so what you are claiming as scientific literature, is merely the opinion of an unqualified person. Reading some of the entries on her web page it is obvious that she is pushing her own agenda rather than reporting the results of a...

Hardly,...

Have you seen Achmed the dead terrorist? Edit: Just watched your video... very funny... I thought you had linked to Achmed the dead terrorist...