|
More site info...
High Performance | Forum profile
|
|
Forum profile page for High Performance on http://www.mercurycougar.net.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: High Performance, located on the Message Board at http://www.mercurycougar.net.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "High Performance" on the Message Board at http://www.mercurycougar.net is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on High Performance:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
33
|
98
|
221
|
|
Post:
|
142
|
377
|
864
|
|
|
High Performance Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
I got a technical challenge for...
Published (2009-12-02 00:29:00)
Coffee and bourbon for breakfeast at 3 am... Fastcat1970, Twin turbos have their uses. I'm trying really hard to resist getting into a discussion of TT versus Single but you're pushing it... It is -not- a bling thing, it's an application specific, where and when you want your power most. Do what I'm doing, research a bit more and you'll learn what I know. As for what you guys win? Respect and street cred nothing more...
user's latest post:
I got a technical challenge for...
Published (2009-12-02 00:29:00)
Remote turbos can be a good idea. Pressure loss is minimal over the course of intake length, and the intake charge does stay cooler. The material expense increases as does the engineering needed the farther they get from the intake valve.
user's latest post:
Has anyone tried an SVO...
Published (2009-11-27 07:15:00)
My 85 Turbo coupe T'bird weighed 3390 Lbs. W/ Full tank of gas & no Cargo
user's latest post:
Has anyone tried an SVO...
Published (2009-11-28 14:00:00)
Roush was building turbo motors that were based on the 2.3 OHC that were producing 250hp........Per cylinder!!
user's latest post:
Has anyone tried an SVO...
Published (2009-12-01 00:00:00)
i agree but at least it was a slug straight 6 car, not a factory v8 car
user's latest post:
Edelbrock power package top end kit
Published (2009-12-01 00:00:00)
If this Package supercharges my 302/2bbl with original 220HP to somehow 360+ it is definitely the ultimate thing to do. The price looks more than fair to me - pls correct me if I´m wrong. Mike
user's latest post:
I got a technical challenge for...
Published (2009-12-02 00:29:00)
Quote: Originally Posted by toms66GTstang Sorry I don't have more info at hand, but you could do the dual turbos in the rear after the tailpipes. Stacey David built a cool Vette as a giveway, on Gearz, with this setup. Also I saw a really slick aftermarket EFI setup that looks like a carb and bolts right in place of a 4BBL with a small controller - saw that one on one of the saturday morning powerblock shows I think. Can proably find it...
user's latest post:
Has anyone tried an SVO...
Published (2009-11-27 07:15:00)
Well how much do those T-Bird Turbo Coupes weigh? My 69 Weighed 3520 when it was all together, and that was with a 351 and all. I imagine a 67/8 would be a touch less. I imagine with the 4 banger in there it would also be a touch less. swapping to the 4 banger alone should bring it to around 3400 lbs. Its heavier than a Fox Mustang but a Thunderbird TC should be pretty close to that.
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on High Performance::
Started 2 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-02 23:43:00)
by cougarlover29
what brand shocks did you get? Make sure you tightened them down enough so that there is no leak. I bought Monroe, but it shouldn't make that much difference. I haven't put air in mine in about a year.
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-14 16:50:00)
by Bad69cat
I gotta '69 so it may not help much but it could give you ideas. Thought I had it loaded up on my album....guess not. I'll post 'em latter and shoot you a note. I did have to weld in a wide plate , but I did it along with the subframe connectors anyway. Worked out pretty good. I had a guy with a hydro bender and notch cutter help me. That was a long time ago - maybe now there is one that can be ...
Started 4 days, 5 hours ago (2009-12-01 00:29:00)
by Mr. Squirrel
he wants everyone to do his homework, haha.
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-27 07:15:00)
by RoadRacer68
Thanks to all for the compliments, I really appreciate it.....
To answer the other questions....331, Vic Jr heads, Parker intake, Cam Research roller cam, made 402 to the ground with straight 110 running through it and the timing up a little more than I usually run. But more realistically, makes 390+ to the ground running 36 degrees of timing and 95 octane.
I have the TCP subframes in it and...
Started 2 weeks, 6 days ago (2009-11-14 19:34:00)
by maxgig
I'm having sequential light problems when the headlights are on. I went to Auto Zone and found out that my battery is bad; I'm going to replace it today. They also showed me that my alternator was putting out 12.9 to 13.2 volts; I didn't think to have them check it under load though.
I remember someone here saying that there was a high output alternator that we could use. Anyone know what ...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-26 07:15:00)
by CougarCJ
Not to my knowledge.
Someone found a Mercedes diesel conversion on Craig's list once.
Started 5 days, 13 hours ago (2009-11-29 16:00:00)
by CougarMike68
Hi Jan, thanks for that fast reply. Would you confirm the 360+HPs of that Power Package or is this just marketing ?
Regards from munich/germany
Mike
Started 3 weeks, 3 days ago (2009-11-10 15:52:00)
by ray-g151
went a 9.88@134 over the weekend, then backed it up with a 9.93 lifting
just past the 1000', ( no license)
just a 427w ,highports,13;1,super vic intake,.760-.735, 269-279 @ .050
solid roller, c-4 trans,5500 8"conv., 3350 lbs on the foot brake
now I can change the camshaft and port the intake
(vids coming soon)
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-26 07:15:00)
by Bad69cat
You can get by with additives on a normal driver. It is hard on the valves, so just plan that sometime in the future you should have hardened valve seats installed and upgrade the valves while you are at it. OR just opt for a good set of modern heads at that point.
Started 3 weeks ago (2009-11-13 09:28:00)
by cougarshaman
I think that you should pay to have a custom cam ground for your engine.
Your engine is very much the inverse of what manufacturers ballpark their Cleveland street cams for in terms of marketing. You'll be leaving a lot of driveability and power on the table.
|
|
Hot threads for last week on High Performance::
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-26 07:15:00)
by CougarCJ
Not to my knowledge.
Someone found a Mercedes diesel conversion on Craig's list once.
Started 4 days, 5 hours ago (2009-12-01 00:29:00)
by Mr. Squirrel
he wants everyone to do his homework, haha.
Started 5 days, 13 hours ago (2009-11-29 16:00:00)
by CougarMike68
Hi Jan, thanks for that fast reply. Would you confirm the 360+HPs of that Power Package or is this just marketing ?
Regards from munich/germany
Mike
Started 1 week ago (2009-11-27 07:15:00)
by RoadRacer68
Thanks to all for the compliments, I really appreciate it.....
To answer the other questions....331, Vic Jr heads, Parker intake, Cam Research roller cam, made 402 to the ground with straight 110 running through it and the timing up a little more than I usually run. But more realistically, makes 390+ to the ground running 36 degrees of timing and 95 octane.
I have the TCP subframes in it and...
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2009-11-26 07:15:00)
by Bad69cat
You can get by with additives on a normal driver. It is hard on the valves, so just plan that sometime in the future you should have hardened valve seats installed and upgrade the valves while you are at it. OR just opt for a good set of modern heads at that point.
Started 2 weeks, 6 days ago (2009-11-14 19:34:00)
by maxgig
I'm having sequential light problems when the headlights are on. I went to Auto Zone and found out that my battery is bad; I'm going to replace it today. They also showed me that my alternator was putting out 12.9 to 13.2 volts; I didn't think to have them check it under load though.
I remember someone here saying that there was a high output alternator that we could use. Anyone know what ...
Started 3 weeks ago (2009-11-13 09:28:00)
by cougarshaman
I think that you should pay to have a custom cam ground for your engine.
Your engine is very much the inverse of what manufacturers ballpark their Cleveland street cams for in terms of marketing. You'll be leaving a lot of driveability and power on the table.
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-14 16:50:00)
by Bad69cat
I gotta '69 so it may not help much but it could give you ideas. Thought I had it loaded up on my album....guess not. I'll post 'em latter and shoot you a note. I did have to weld in a wide plate , but I did it along with the subframe connectors anyway. Worked out pretty good. I had a guy with a hydro bender and notch cutter help me. That was a long time ago - maybe now there is one that can be ...
Started 2 days, 6 hours ago (2009-12-02 23:43:00)
by cougarlover29
what brand shocks did you get? Make sure you tightened them down enough so that there is no leak. I bought Monroe, but it shouldn't make that much difference. I haven't put air in mine in about a year.
Started 3 weeks, 1 day ago (2009-11-12 06:28:00)
by leonbray
this is an ongoing debate
New cars have electric fans because they are better at controlling engine temperature within a narrow range
Most people that oppose electrics do so because they didn't fit the right fan combination in the first place
With electrics you need to:
run a fan with capacity to cool your engine - ie from a Lincoln V8 or equivalent
use the correct thermostat ...
|
|