City vs. City | Forum profile

Quote: Originally Posted by Spade Because Keisha Cole is from Oakland and Sammy is from Miami. Jagged Edge hasn't had a hit since 2000 and Monica hasn't had a hit since 2004. Monica's best days was in the 90s. Honestly, the mainstream right now is trash . I wouldn't brag if my city is on top when it comes to mainstream. That's why I don't listen to it. The best talent that hip hop has to offer does not come on...

I'd have to say San Francisco...just beautiful if you include the suspension bridges. But I like them all for instance..Los Angeles looks nice from the Griffith Observatory. http://www.pdphoto.org/PictureDetail.php?mat=&pg=8368 http://www.flickr.com/photos/yi_peng/355078862/sizes/l/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFOtCJKsLw4

I think you could make the argument that if you combined Boston and Philadelphia it would be much like a mini-NYC. Philly is more Blue-Collar, while Boston is more Blue-Blood. I've always thought of Boston and Philly to kind of be like the "kids" of New York. Philly is like a dock worker, and Boston is a doctor. However, there are plenty of similar traits between the two cities. Philly may be blue-collar, but it's...

Quote: Originally Posted by missionhome I would like to know HOW there is more variety in the Chicago suburbs. I know somebody mentioned it, but it seems like outside of Chicago proper, Chicagoland doesn't have as much going on as the Bay Area. The Bay Area has more diverse geography, better weather, less segregation, walkable suburbs with downtowns, etc.... What does Chicagoland have that makes it better??? Just curious. Nothing! These...

Miami is very cool. I always have a great time there. But Im love with Seattle. The skyline is the best in the west imo, Downtown Area is lovely, the waterfront areas, the lakes and sound, the hills, the trees(so green!) and it feels so darn clean. Everytime I go to Seattle (or Portland), I can always picture myself living up there.

Quote: Originally Posted by rah San Francisco: AWESOME photos.

Quote: Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 I know you love your town, but Houston really doesn't deserve to be on that list with those other cities in terms of skyline density. Take out Houston and put in San Francisco, and you've got an accurate list. I'm just curious: I wonder if the same people who think Dallas has a better skyline than San Francisco also think that Atlanta's skyline is superior to San Francisco's....

Quote: Originally Posted by MrMcCoySays And why don't Houston and Dallas have any prominent spire/antenna buildings? Dallas has 2 buildings with spires! Renaissance Tower Republic Tower 1 now known as Gables Republic Tower

Quote: Originally Posted by grapico so i guess dallas kills paris and london also then? :/ i agree dallas has bigger monster buildings but that isn't all of the skyline to me. Maybe Paris but not London. Dallas + uptown kills many skylines, but London isn't one of them.

Quote: Originally Posted by Traveling RS In that case, about an hour and a half north east of Warsaw is another camp called Treblinka. It's near the town of brok. I would suggest you visit while your in Warsaw. Treblinka extermination camp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia I believe this was the second largest camp after Auschwitz. Yeah, I knew it was there and I know about the camp. I'll have to see if we have the time. Thanks for...