Optimatch Playlist Forum | Forum profile

More different types of people. That way cheaters and only competitive players don't run the playlist.

Posted by: H3F legend Posted by: Host Yea, they should just merge the gametypes together and make it social. Balance the weighting of BR starts as to not piss off the "casual" kids. Ya theyve tried catering objective to casuals and then to the more hardcore. Both failed Why not try to please everyone at once? I think that bungie once thought the "hardore" was a bit more serious about actually playing the...

Posted by: Stickmen13 Posted by: The EAKLE Posted by: BadBall3r47 Because people complained about there being no Objective playlist, it's put back in and nobody plays it but nobody complains anymore. It's a win-win situation. People do still complain though. There are threads about "why throwback fails" every other day. People are just getting to picky. We lose objective and everyone freaks out. We get it...

Posted by: Uncle Kulikov Posted by: YESYEH I know for a fact that you can't see flaws like that just looking at the raw data. I know that you are lying. Data doesn't lie. It doesn't skew. It doesn't cheat, steal, or pretend. It is simply what is. This. A single person can't decide what is good or not as a fact. Everyone will have their own opinions and such about games, but the data shows tha...

Posted by: presidentalkrew it all starts at the 40s area. Not at level 5 buddy. If you dont know what your talking about, please dont post. lol well thats the whole point "buddy". If the problem is only in the 40s( an area that holds probably less that 5% of the playlists population)then how would fixing their problems increase squad's population? The reason I dont play has nothing to do with cheaters and thats...

Posted by: Tuck3r42 Posted by: superduper66 No no no Longshore is horrible with 8v8. The spawn killing and spawn trapping that happens makes playing on it just plain terrible. In other words, you suck. Haha, pretty much. Longshore needs to have alot of the cover remooved from the back side of the high base, and from the area above invisibility. Then they need to add a warthog, just one. Thus making the map better. Duh.

More BR starts for ranked. Social? It's fine as is I guess. For ranked, give us moar BRs.

Posted by: iRec7ifY Most Anti-AR threads (all of the intelligent ones) are about the AR being to weak (or really being effective at long enough range) to be and effective starting weapon. When one team gets map control + power weapons and BRs, the team left spawing with ARs has little to no chance of coming back/regaining map control. This is true. Where it becomes inane is where some of the aforementioned threads suggest removing the AR...

Posted by: jacob crawford I don't think people who get cheated are just 50s. Ever played 40 + Squad or Throwback? Yes. While I can't recall a specific instance atm all the sqaud pros talk about it a lot. The player base was to small so once you get in the 40s you just match cheaters a lot.

Posted by: RELLIK PIR Posted by: HaVOk1228 You seem to be arguing with me about how AR starts suck, as if I disagree. Showing further your failure to actually comprehend anything I've said. I HATE AR starts, and want them completely eliminated from high level mamtchmaking. The problem is I understand not everyone hates them, so i don't think all of matchmaking should be changed to cater to the needs of people who think like...