Canada | Forum profile

Quote: Originally Posted by Almost Canadian I can't see that it will make any real difference. I am sure that the relevent regulators will argue that, currently, their assessment criteria are timely, fair, predictable. It will not increase the amount of residency places available for doctors, it will not increase the numbers of places available for lawyers to article, it will not increase the number of junior positions for teachers,...

Quote: Originally Posted by BristolUK Claiming a tax refund for circumstances that don't actually permit? I would expect that to stand out a bit. With a moving expenses claim your tax return does not show where or why you moved, merely you had the expense and claimed a deduction. The tax system relies on the filer knowing what they are doing, this is why returns get checked through the year.

to the o/p, firstly you need to go onto the police section of this forum. you will find two very lengthy threads there, of which probably your best source of info will be ann. she has been over here with her husband, CPS for around 3yrs, i have been here a little less than that with EPS. on the threads everything is covered, all the bills, take home pay, tax, pension, overtime, allowances and medical coverage. you have a lot of reading to do....

Quote: Originally Posted by fledermaus I'm curious about the time it took for them to get back to you. We claimed for moving house in Canada but we were only just over the 40km distance so are half expecting a letter saying they want to audit us, or that they want the money back. Do we wait until the end of this year to think we are safe or a year from when we submitted? I think it's a year from then, but probably you are never safe...

Quote: Originally Posted by The Aviator If you are moving closer to work. This is what you need.. http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pbg/tf/t1-m/t1-m-08e.pdf <slaps forehead> Thanks for that but it's a tax break on personal income. I don't pay any personal income tax anyway.

Quote: Originally Posted by fiona705 if we wasn't entitled to it why the hell did the tax office pay us in the first blasted place???!!!! Quote: Originally Posted by fiona705 I think the tax office is to blame - some one screwed up!!! if we were not entitled to it - fine - they should have said that in the first place instead of just dishing out the money & then at a later date wanting it back. Quote: Originally Posted by...

Quote: Originally Posted by Butch Cassidy Motel Village (as suggested already), HoJo on Macleod , OR (is want a guide) Best western downtown on 8th Street SW (I can see you from my window then) Just added links for named locations.

Quote: Originally Posted by Alan2005 http://news.gc.ca/web/article-eng.do...dex&nid=499119 It's going to get easier apparently. Not sure what this actually means for those who need to do this though. I can't see that it will make any real difference. I am sure that the relevent regulators will argue that, currently, their assessment criteria are timely, fair, predictable. It will not increase the amount of residency places...

Quote: Originally Posted by The Aviator It's usually 3 years for most circumstances, but they can go back up to 7 years with cause to do so. The only exception is in the cases of suspected you've been naughty, when they can go as far back as they like. So 3 years to keep that money to one side. OK. Thanks

Quote: Originally Posted by Almost Canadian What about parking though? they have free parking for residents