Legal Discussion | Forum profile

^I don't deny anything the two above posters said. Ideally, that would be and probably is the case with most professors. But is it worth the risk when a topic without the same controversy (and lack of sources, apparently) could just as easily be chosen? the impact your professors' impression of you has on your marks would surprise you. heck, it would probably surprise your profs. Whether or not your prof likes THIS paper, it will...

Hmm, I wrote a paper about Charles Manson once, and another time I wrote one about American Skinheads. It wasn't the content that got me the A either time, it was the manner in which it was written. However, you've got to start somewhere, and he specified that he needed resources. I'm hoping that the links I've included in my above post lead to a paper which can be written well.

Quote: Originally Posted by garuda Untrue, in several states and cities syringes may be sold by pharmacies freely but possession is still illegal used or not. Sorry, but I have a hard time believing that. Quote: People are also being charged with paraphenalia for the ziploc baggie their drugs are in, or even the pharmacy bottle pills are in. For the baggie the drugs are in? I have never heard of this. Is this something you...

^ Oh - thanks for pointing that out, toa$t! I had missed that. I see your point now.

wow... one state over in Indiana, I got popped with less than 1 gram and a bowl, first offence, managed luckily to get on diversion, 20 hours community service, a living life clean class, a 1 year, keep your nose clean contract, taken to jail and given $5000 bail, and altogether counting the lawyer, the bail, the diversion fees, the class fees and the urine tests associated with the living life clean class, and the court costs, it has cost me...

I don't believe they tell the public the truth about their policy. Just like AT&T doesn't tell the public the truth about their NSA dealings. Maybe even law enforcement can't get the SMS logs for criminal trials with a subpeona, but I'm pretty sure intelligence agents and the Pentagon have forced every cellular company who publicly claims not to be logging everything to at least be forwarding it to government...

Ah, ok. That is what I assumed you were hinting at, but wanted to make sure. I don't necessarily take a stance on that issue specifically. I will say though, that AT&T/Cingular did use to store and provide the text of SMS messages, they stated this publicly, and would provide them under the circumstances I stated above. Their new policy (I believe it went into effect September or October of this year) is that they don't even...

Dude that website is awesome. I am really thankful you put that up there. The cheaper lawyer I ended up getting has actually twice the amount of professional experience as the expensive ass one, and I'm really pleased to find out that he worked as asst. state's attorney.

Please only reply if you know for sure what you are talking about. If someone was wanting to carry 1000 prescription pills, for which they do not have a prescription, with them on a domestic U.S. flight, and The prescription they are wanting to carry is a Schedule IV Controlled Substance, would they be able to? I have visited the TSA website and this is its policy on prescription medications: "There are no restrictions to non-liquid...

Quote: Originally Posted by Foul Play The first site that came up on a google say's yes. I didn't go too in depth with it, but it's a d.o.j. site. http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/faq/rx_monitor.htm#1 The date published on it is NOV 08. While I'm not 100% positive, I'd venture to guess all US states have some form of tracking by this point. nope not all of them, but most, was just wondering if mine got it yet.