Abortion | Forum profile

More to do with (perceived) economic necessity and carrying on Family name in the midst of a communazi government shooting themselves in the sack with a policy of disturbing nature and forced one-child-per-family. As an example of population-control-abortion hysteriacs clouding common sense China has room and rice for twice the population if they moved away from the massive coastal cities and they are trying to dictate how many people have...

Quote: Originally Posted by Maw-Maw How do we identify which unborn children will lead these terrible lives so we don’t butcher some who might have lived good lives? I get it,just the ones who come from poor women,or broken homes or maybe just single women.. Sounds like they are still pushing the eugenics agenda that the pro choice movement was founded on doesn't it? Margaret Sanger would be proud.

Quote: Originally Posted by Maw-Maw I never said all insurance companies won't cover it. Medicaid has done surgery for it in the past. Their website states that because of a "lack of well controlled, long term studies of the safety and effectiveness...there is a high rate of serious complications for these surgical procedures. There is a diagnosis for it. I don't find it offensive. Its a disorder,a very expensive one. it...

Quote: Originally Posted by bluedog The only dissertation you find being presented by ME....is not a work of my own creation, and its certainly NOTHING NEW. believe me i am aware that your rants are not entirely of your creation. you lifted them from your bible study group. yeah i been to those too. nothing new, you said it brother. Quote: Originally Posted by bluedog The "PROOF" that I always present and you continually...

Quote: Originally Posted by PaleRider Read roe. The court made its decision based on an assumption. The court admitted that its decision was based on an assumption. The assumption was that unborns were something other than human beings until they reached the arbitrary time the court set for having an abortion. Further, the court stated that should their assumption be proven wrong and that unborns were actually human beings, or if some legal...

Quote: Originally Posted by wolf_22 yes thats the point. medical choices are up to the individual. would you like others to mandate your health? I don't want you to have any choice in what I do to my body. and I don't care what you do to yours. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condom http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/004001.htm http://www.hpvforum.com/hpv-and-condoms.asp haha...Obamacare will mandate medical choices. you have...

Quote: Originally Posted by PaleRider I see that you are as ignorant of the abortaficient effects of the morning after pill as you are everyting else regarding this issue. The morning after pill is meant to be taken the very next day following unprotected sex. If a woman waits and she is already pregnant it should not be taken. There are some, but very few side effects with the MAP. That is a fact, but clearly you're not intersted in...

Quote: Originally Posted by satv365 Not really. If such laws on the books still exist, there is no legal way for them to be upheld. They where ruled unconstitutional, just like small towns who still have laws banning blacks from being on the street at night... Lastly, sexual activity has never destroyed any civilization. No empirical evidence shows such a ludicrous theory as valid. Tell that to the lady who was arrested and charged in Mass. a...

Quote: Originally Posted by wolf_22 yeah China. you don't think intentionally trying to avoid having women because you find them to be undesirible or getting rid of female children (adoption, murder) isn't a symptom of misogyny? its definatly part of patriarchy. well i think you've totaly mis-understood what has been happening in china. because of the one child law (now amended so if the first child is a girl the family is...

OK, we'll see about that...