Started 1 month ago (2009-11-23 18:26:00)
by Darkness Falls
Too close to Christmas IMO.
Either Dec 18th or Dec 21st
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-11-05 16:53:00)
by MountainHawk
This thread cannot exist (according to Cummins), so posting here doesn't
really count.
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-31 20:39:00)
by ReserveRage
I think it will really depend whether you
normalized the adjusted loss
ratios. This is very unclear because Feldblum never actually does a
complete example. Also, both sample solutions from the 2008 exam did not
normalize.
Started 1 year, 6 months ago (2008-06-02 08:07:00)
by Jon Fox
Here is an updated chart of the readings for Fall 2008.
Papers are listed by: Learning Objective & Knowledge statements
Point Value
It maps each paper to the objectives and vice versa.
There is also a checklist /
recommended reading order.
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-10-30 11:05:00)
by MountainHawk
I'll compile the answers here as people confirm what they think the answers were. Changes from my original solutions are in red.
Next post will have my IRR solution ... not sure if it is right.
4. a) 74,617 b) .1473
5. x1= .988 x2 =1.213 y1=1.044 y2=1.032
6. b) Science, Engineering, Insurance
7. 20,072
8. a) 112%
c) ???
9. Society RoA, Regulators RoS, Stockholders ...
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-10-29 18:02:00)
by Darkness Falls
What did you guys get for the question where we had to calculate # of
policies for the 10% return
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-11-06 18:11:00)
by Zumpano
Quote:
Originally Posted by five_cents
In terms of the "power" of testing whether a candidate is sufficiently prepared for important topics, I feel the 2008 exam is better. For example, I would argue that the 2009 "
GLM" question has a testing power close to zero.
To five_cents:
What was wrong with the 2009 GLM...
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-11-04 12:10:00)
by Zumpano
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Darkness Falls
I just sent 2 e-mails to Bob Craver ( bcraver@casact.org ) for the Nash Pooling Equilibrium question and #7 about the unknown expense amount.
Anyone else send e-mails for these 2 questions or others that might be ambiguous/defective?
To Darkness Falls:
I might...
Started 1 month, 3 weeks ago (2009-10-31 13:06:00)
by gausszhou
64 is what I hope and what I guess due to the difficulity that I feel and
last year's low passing ratio.
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-10-30 10:26:00)
by MathForMarines
I voted very hard, not because of the material, but because of the use of
prior exam material to unnecessarily complicate things.