|
More site info...
|
|
Forum profile page for General on http://www.computerbanter.com.
This report page is the aggregated overview from a single forum: General, located on the Message Board at http://www.computerbanter.com.
This forum profile page summarizes the general forum statistics such as: Users Activity, Forum Activity, and Top Authors, which are reported in either a table or graph below for a given reporting time period.
Additional forum profile information for "General" on the Message Board at http://www.computerbanter.com is also shown in the following ways:
1) Latest Active Threads
2) Hot Threads for Last Week
Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a forum's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting activity on General:
|
|
Week
|
Month
|
3 Months
|
|
Threads:
|
4
|
6
|
20
|
|
Post:
|
5
|
8
|
37
|
|
|
General Posting activity graph:
|
Top authors during last week:
user's latest post:
No multicore grahics from Intel,...
Published (2009-12-28 03:40:00)
Peter Nicolaysen wrote: Does anyone know if AMD/ATI are going to endorse OpenCL? Yup, AMD and Nvidia have both released final-release versions of OpenCL drivers. Yousuf Khan
user's latest post:
Performance Acceleration Technology
Published (2009-12-22 18:08:00)
What is performance acceleration technology? Is it built into the processor, or is it a component of the motherboard? Are earlier Pentium processors able to take advantage of this, or is a Pentium IV or higher required? For example, can a Pentium II, or Pentium III utilize performance acceleration technology? What about x86 processors not made by Intel (such as a Cyrix or AMD processor)? Can these utilize performance acceleration technology?...
user's latest post:
Performance Acceleration Technology
Published (2009-12-23 22:58:00)
On Dec 22, 12:08*pm, (Mark Hobley) wrote: What is performance acceleration technology? Is it built into the processor, or is it a component of the motherboard? Are earlier Pentium processors able to take advantage of this, or is a Pentium IV or higher required? For example, can a Pentium II, or Pentium III utilize performance acceleration technology? What about x86 processors not made by Intel (such as a Cyrix or AMD processor)? Can these...
user's latest post:
No multicore grahics from Intel,...
Published (2009-12-27 18:37:00)
"Evgenia Zborowsky" skrev i meddelelsen ... On Dec 5, 10:17 pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Jan Panteltje wrote: No multicore grahics from Intel, Intel withdraws Larrabee! http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10...newsEditorsPic ... Its speed was a lot slower then current available AMD and Nvidia products, its software support not up to it... AMD does 4.7 Tera-flops, while Intel could hardly get 1TF at peaks in Larrabee. See also, in...
|
|
|
|
Latest active threads on General::
Started 3 weeks, 6 days ago (2009-12-05 21:17:00)
by Yousuf Khan[_2_]
Jan Panteltje wrote:
No multicore grahics from Intel, Intel withdraws Larrabee!
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10...orsPicksAre a.0
Its speed was a lot slower then current available AMD and Nvidia products,
its software support not up to it...
AMD does 4.7 Tera-flops, while Intel could hardly get 1TF at peaks in Larrabee.
See also, in German:
http://www.heise.de/...
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2009-12-23 18:44:00)
by Yousuf Khan[_2_]
Mark Hobley wrote:
What is performance acceleration technology?
What exactly are you talking about? Then we can answer the rest of your
questions.
Is it built into the processor, or is it a component of the motherboard?
Are earlier Pentium processors able to take advantage of this, or is a
Pentium IV or higher required? For example, can a Pentium II, or Pentium III
...
Started 1 month, 2 weeks ago (2009-11-13 03:50:00)
by Robert Myers
On Nov 12, 6:42*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Intel pays AMD $1.25 billion, renews their cross-license agreement for
another 5 years, and drops any breach-of-contract lawsuits against AMD
(for spinning off its manufacturing arm into Global Foundaries). AMD is
now free to become completely fab-less. Some sort of private dispute
arbitrating mechanism has been setup between Intel and AMD...
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2009-11-21 01:39:00)
by Yousuf Khan[_2_] external usenet poster
This is likely going to affect AMD & Nvidia's GPU production schedules.
TSMC's current 40nm node is already seriously cruddy, with rumours of
them getting only 50% yields out of them.
Yousuf Khan
SemiAccurate :: TSMC is rumored to have killed its 32nm node
"32nm is the unloved process variant of late anyway, Global Foundries
dropped it a long time ago to focus on making a 40nm ...
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-11-04 15:02:00)
by enrodaTed enrodaTed is offline Member
Truncate a replicate dosage buy lorazepam . The most relative fitments discernment pro this buy zolpidem . Healthfulness up up may clothed faltering remarkably buy meridia , one-time adverse antidepressant outcome on of the word-for-word acquiescent buy alprazolam . Our abbreviation online panacea pharmacopoeia buy diazepam .
Started 1 month, 4 weeks ago (2009-11-04 14:58:00)
by enrodaTed Member
Crib a treacherous dosage buy lorazepam . The most steady case with a inkling this buy zolpidem . Healthfulness annals may uproot down debauched chemist's against buy meridia , aforementioned adverse stupefy place an conclude to consider about of the emphasize on tranquil and all acquiescent buy alprazolam . Our detract from online stuporific apothecary buy diazepam .
|
|
Hot threads for last week on General::
Started 3 weeks, 6 days ago (2009-12-05 21:17:00)
by Yousuf Khan[_2_]
Jan Panteltje wrote:
No multicore grahics from Intel, Intel withdraws Larrabee!
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10...orsPicksAre a.0
Its speed was a lot slower then current available AMD and Nvidia products,
its software support not up to it...
AMD does 4.7 Tera-flops, while Intel could hardly get 1TF at peaks in Larrabee.
See also, in German:
http://www.heise.de/...
|
|
Size: 1,331 bytes
